Cargando…

Impact of the Epithelial Lining Fluid Milieu on Amikacin Pharmacodynamics Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa

BACKGROUND: Even though nebulised administration of amikacin can achieve high epithelial lining fluid concentrations, this has not translated into improved patient outcomes in clinical trials. One possible reason is that the cellular and chemical composition of the epithelial lining fluid may inhibi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heffernan, Aaron J., Sime, Fekade B., Lim, Sazlyna Mohd Sazlly, Naicker, Saiyuri, Andrews, Katherine T., Ellwood, David, Lipman, Jeffrey, Grimwood, Keith, Roberts, Jason A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8017437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33797739
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40268-021-00344-5
_version_ 1783674055911538688
author Heffernan, Aaron J.
Sime, Fekade B.
Lim, Sazlyna Mohd Sazlly
Naicker, Saiyuri
Andrews, Katherine T.
Ellwood, David
Lipman, Jeffrey
Grimwood, Keith
Roberts, Jason A.
author_facet Heffernan, Aaron J.
Sime, Fekade B.
Lim, Sazlyna Mohd Sazlly
Naicker, Saiyuri
Andrews, Katherine T.
Ellwood, David
Lipman, Jeffrey
Grimwood, Keith
Roberts, Jason A.
author_sort Heffernan, Aaron J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Even though nebulised administration of amikacin can achieve high epithelial lining fluid concentrations, this has not translated into improved patient outcomes in clinical trials. One possible reason is that the cellular and chemical composition of the epithelial lining fluid may inhibit amikacin-mediated bacterial killing. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to identify whether the epithelial lining fluid components inhibit amikacin-mediated bacterial killing. METHODS: Two amikacin-susceptible (minimum inhibitory concentrations of 2 and 8 mg/L) Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were exposed in vitro to amikacin concentrations up to 976 mg/L in the presence of an acidic pH, mucin and/or surfactant as a means of simulating the epithelial lining fluid, the site of bacterial infection in pneumonia. Pharmacodynamic modelling was used to describe associations between amikacin concentrations, bacterial killing and emergence of resistance. RESULTS: In the presence of broth alone, there was rapid and extensive (> 6 − log(10)) bacterial killing, with emergence of resistance identified in amikacin concentrations < 976 mg/L. In contrast, the rate and extent of bacterial killing was reduced (≤ 5 − log(10)) when exposed to an acidic pH and mucin. Surfactant did not appreciably impact the bacterial killing or resistance emergence when compared with broth alone for either isolate. The combination of mucin and an acidic pH further reduced the rate of bacterial killing, with the maximal bacterial killing occurring 24 h following initial exposure compared with approximately 4–8 h for either mucin or an acidic pH alone. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that simulating the epithelial lining fluid antagonises amikacin-mediated killing of P. aeruginosa, even at the high concentrations achieved following nebulised administration. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40268-021-00344-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8017437
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80174372021-04-02 Impact of the Epithelial Lining Fluid Milieu on Amikacin Pharmacodynamics Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Heffernan, Aaron J. Sime, Fekade B. Lim, Sazlyna Mohd Sazlly Naicker, Saiyuri Andrews, Katherine T. Ellwood, David Lipman, Jeffrey Grimwood, Keith Roberts, Jason A. Drugs R D Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Even though nebulised administration of amikacin can achieve high epithelial lining fluid concentrations, this has not translated into improved patient outcomes in clinical trials. One possible reason is that the cellular and chemical composition of the epithelial lining fluid may inhibit amikacin-mediated bacterial killing. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to identify whether the epithelial lining fluid components inhibit amikacin-mediated bacterial killing. METHODS: Two amikacin-susceptible (minimum inhibitory concentrations of 2 and 8 mg/L) Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were exposed in vitro to amikacin concentrations up to 976 mg/L in the presence of an acidic pH, mucin and/or surfactant as a means of simulating the epithelial lining fluid, the site of bacterial infection in pneumonia. Pharmacodynamic modelling was used to describe associations between amikacin concentrations, bacterial killing and emergence of resistance. RESULTS: In the presence of broth alone, there was rapid and extensive (> 6 − log(10)) bacterial killing, with emergence of resistance identified in amikacin concentrations < 976 mg/L. In contrast, the rate and extent of bacterial killing was reduced (≤ 5 − log(10)) when exposed to an acidic pH and mucin. Surfactant did not appreciably impact the bacterial killing or resistance emergence when compared with broth alone for either isolate. The combination of mucin and an acidic pH further reduced the rate of bacterial killing, with the maximal bacterial killing occurring 24 h following initial exposure compared with approximately 4–8 h for either mucin or an acidic pH alone. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that simulating the epithelial lining fluid antagonises amikacin-mediated killing of P. aeruginosa, even at the high concentrations achieved following nebulised administration. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40268-021-00344-5. Springer International Publishing 2021-04-02 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8017437/ /pubmed/33797739 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40268-021-00344-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Heffernan, Aaron J.
Sime, Fekade B.
Lim, Sazlyna Mohd Sazlly
Naicker, Saiyuri
Andrews, Katherine T.
Ellwood, David
Lipman, Jeffrey
Grimwood, Keith
Roberts, Jason A.
Impact of the Epithelial Lining Fluid Milieu on Amikacin Pharmacodynamics Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa
title Impact of the Epithelial Lining Fluid Milieu on Amikacin Pharmacodynamics Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa
title_full Impact of the Epithelial Lining Fluid Milieu on Amikacin Pharmacodynamics Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa
title_fullStr Impact of the Epithelial Lining Fluid Milieu on Amikacin Pharmacodynamics Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa
title_full_unstemmed Impact of the Epithelial Lining Fluid Milieu on Amikacin Pharmacodynamics Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa
title_short Impact of the Epithelial Lining Fluid Milieu on Amikacin Pharmacodynamics Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa
title_sort impact of the epithelial lining fluid milieu on amikacin pharmacodynamics against pseudomonas aeruginosa
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8017437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33797739
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40268-021-00344-5
work_keys_str_mv AT heffernanaaronj impactoftheepithelialliningfluidmilieuonamikacinpharmacodynamicsagainstpseudomonasaeruginosa
AT simefekadeb impactoftheepithelialliningfluidmilieuonamikacinpharmacodynamicsagainstpseudomonasaeruginosa
AT limsazlynamohdsazlly impactoftheepithelialliningfluidmilieuonamikacinpharmacodynamicsagainstpseudomonasaeruginosa
AT naickersaiyuri impactoftheepithelialliningfluidmilieuonamikacinpharmacodynamicsagainstpseudomonasaeruginosa
AT andrewskatherinet impactoftheepithelialliningfluidmilieuonamikacinpharmacodynamicsagainstpseudomonasaeruginosa
AT ellwooddavid impactoftheepithelialliningfluidmilieuonamikacinpharmacodynamicsagainstpseudomonasaeruginosa
AT lipmanjeffrey impactoftheepithelialliningfluidmilieuonamikacinpharmacodynamicsagainstpseudomonasaeruginosa
AT grimwoodkeith impactoftheepithelialliningfluidmilieuonamikacinpharmacodynamicsagainstpseudomonasaeruginosa
AT robertsjasona impactoftheepithelialliningfluidmilieuonamikacinpharmacodynamicsagainstpseudomonasaeruginosa