Cargando…

Clinical efficacy of ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency combined with ganglion impar block for treatment of perineal pain

BACKGROUND: Ganglion impar block alone or pulsed radiofrequency alone are effective options for treating perineal pain. However, ganglion impar block combined with pulsed radiofrequency (GIB-PRF) for treating perineal pain is rare and the puncture is usually performed with X-ray or computed tomograp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Shui-Qing, Jiang, Ling, Cui, Li-Gang, Jia, Dong-Lin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8017504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33850934
http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i9.2153
_version_ 1783674068387495936
author Li, Shui-Qing
Jiang, Ling
Cui, Li-Gang
Jia, Dong-Lin
author_facet Li, Shui-Qing
Jiang, Ling
Cui, Li-Gang
Jia, Dong-Lin
author_sort Li, Shui-Qing
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ganglion impar block alone or pulsed radiofrequency alone are effective options for treating perineal pain. However, ganglion impar block combined with pulsed radiofrequency (GIB-PRF) for treating perineal pain is rare and the puncture is usually performed with X-ray or computed tomography guidance. AIM: To evaluate the safety and clinical efficacy of real-time ultrasound-guided GIB-PRF in treating perineal pain. METHODS: Thirty patients with perineal pain were included and were treated by GIB-PRF guided by real-time ultrasound imaging between January 2015 and December 2016. Complications were recorded to observe the safety of the ultrasound-guided GIB-PRF procedure, and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at 24 h before and after treatment and 1, 3, and 6 mo later were analyzed to evaluate clinical efficacy. RESULTS: Ultrasound-guided GIB-PRF was performed successfully in all patients, and no complications occurred. Compared with pretreatment scores, the VAS scores were significantly lower (P < 0.05) at the four time points after treatment. The VAS scores at 1 and 3 mo were slightly lower than those at 24 h (P > 0.05) and were significantly lower at 6 mo after treatment (P < 0.05). There was a tendency toward lower VAS scores at 6 mo after treatment compared with those at 1 and 3 mo (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided GIB-PRF was a safe and effective way to treat perineal pain. The 6-mo short-term clinical efficacy was favorable, but the long-term outcomes need future study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8017504
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80175042021-04-12 Clinical efficacy of ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency combined with ganglion impar block for treatment of perineal pain Li, Shui-Qing Jiang, Ling Cui, Li-Gang Jia, Dong-Lin World J Clin Cases Observational Study BACKGROUND: Ganglion impar block alone or pulsed radiofrequency alone are effective options for treating perineal pain. However, ganglion impar block combined with pulsed radiofrequency (GIB-PRF) for treating perineal pain is rare and the puncture is usually performed with X-ray or computed tomography guidance. AIM: To evaluate the safety and clinical efficacy of real-time ultrasound-guided GIB-PRF in treating perineal pain. METHODS: Thirty patients with perineal pain were included and were treated by GIB-PRF guided by real-time ultrasound imaging between January 2015 and December 2016. Complications were recorded to observe the safety of the ultrasound-guided GIB-PRF procedure, and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at 24 h before and after treatment and 1, 3, and 6 mo later were analyzed to evaluate clinical efficacy. RESULTS: Ultrasound-guided GIB-PRF was performed successfully in all patients, and no complications occurred. Compared with pretreatment scores, the VAS scores were significantly lower (P < 0.05) at the four time points after treatment. The VAS scores at 1 and 3 mo were slightly lower than those at 24 h (P > 0.05) and were significantly lower at 6 mo after treatment (P < 0.05). There was a tendency toward lower VAS scores at 6 mo after treatment compared with those at 1 and 3 mo (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided GIB-PRF was a safe and effective way to treat perineal pain. The 6-mo short-term clinical efficacy was favorable, but the long-term outcomes need future study. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2021-03-26 2021-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8017504/ /pubmed/33850934 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i9.2153 Text en ©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Observational Study
Li, Shui-Qing
Jiang, Ling
Cui, Li-Gang
Jia, Dong-Lin
Clinical efficacy of ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency combined with ganglion impar block for treatment of perineal pain
title Clinical efficacy of ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency combined with ganglion impar block for treatment of perineal pain
title_full Clinical efficacy of ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency combined with ganglion impar block for treatment of perineal pain
title_fullStr Clinical efficacy of ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency combined with ganglion impar block for treatment of perineal pain
title_full_unstemmed Clinical efficacy of ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency combined with ganglion impar block for treatment of perineal pain
title_short Clinical efficacy of ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency combined with ganglion impar block for treatment of perineal pain
title_sort clinical efficacy of ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency combined with ganglion impar block for treatment of perineal pain
topic Observational Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8017504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33850934
http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i9.2153
work_keys_str_mv AT lishuiqing clinicalefficacyofultrasoundguidedpulsedradiofrequencycombinedwithganglionimparblockfortreatmentofperinealpain
AT jiangling clinicalefficacyofultrasoundguidedpulsedradiofrequencycombinedwithganglionimparblockfortreatmentofperinealpain
AT cuiligang clinicalefficacyofultrasoundguidedpulsedradiofrequencycombinedwithganglionimparblockfortreatmentofperinealpain
AT jiadonglin clinicalefficacyofultrasoundguidedpulsedradiofrequencycombinedwithganglionimparblockfortreatmentofperinealpain