Cargando…

Clinical efficacy of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) versus sham therapy (part I) and TTNS versus percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) (part II) on the short term in children with the idiopathic overactive bladder syndrome: protocol for part I of the twofold double-blinded randomized controlled TaPaS trial

BACKGROUND: Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) are effective and safe therapies for overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome in adults. However, few randomized sham-controlled trials have been conducted in a pediatric population. To our knowledge...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghijselings, Lynn, Renson, Catherine, Van de Walle, Johan, Everaert, Karel, Spinoit, Anne-Françoise
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8017511/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33810804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05117-8
_version_ 1783674070034808832
author Ghijselings, Lynn
Renson, Catherine
Van de Walle, Johan
Everaert, Karel
Spinoit, Anne-Françoise
author_facet Ghijselings, Lynn
Renson, Catherine
Van de Walle, Johan
Everaert, Karel
Spinoit, Anne-Françoise
author_sort Ghijselings, Lynn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) are effective and safe therapies for overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome in adults. However, few randomized sham-controlled trials have been conducted in a pediatric population. To our knowledge, both therapies never have been compared in children. AIM: The aim of the complete study is twofold: (1) to assess the efficacy of TTNS therapy on bladder symptoms after 12 weeks of treatment in a pediatric population with idiopathic overactive bladder syndrome (iOAB) and/or nocturnal enuresis (part I) and (2) to assess the effect of TTNS compared to PTNS (part II). In this article, we aim to present the protocol of the first part of the TaPaS trial (TTNS, PTNS, sham therapy). METHODS: Part I of the TaPaS trial is set up as a single-center randomized-controlled trial. Children, aged from 5 to 12 years with iOAB and/or nocturnal enuresis, are assigned to two groups by computer-generated randomization: TTNS therapy (intervention) and sham therapy (control). The primary outcome is the percentage difference in average voided volume (AVV) between baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. Secondary endpoints are the percentage difference in supervoid volumes, number of urinary incontinence episodes/24 h and in voiding frequency, the difference in parent reported outcomes between baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment, and the duration of clinical response. DISCUSSION: We hypothesize that TTNS is a non-inferior treatment for iOAB in children compared to PTNS therapy. Since literature is inconclusive about the efficacy of TTNS in a pediatric population, a sham-controlled RCT on TTNS will be conducted (part I). A protocol for a prospective randomized sham-controlled trial has been developed. Enrolment has started in November 2018. Study completion of part I is expected by August 2021. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT 04256876. Retrospectively registered on February 5, 2020. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-021-05117-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8017511
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80175112021-04-02 Clinical efficacy of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) versus sham therapy (part I) and TTNS versus percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) (part II) on the short term in children with the idiopathic overactive bladder syndrome: protocol for part I of the twofold double-blinded randomized controlled TaPaS trial Ghijselings, Lynn Renson, Catherine Van de Walle, Johan Everaert, Karel Spinoit, Anne-Françoise Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) are effective and safe therapies for overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome in adults. However, few randomized sham-controlled trials have been conducted in a pediatric population. To our knowledge, both therapies never have been compared in children. AIM: The aim of the complete study is twofold: (1) to assess the efficacy of TTNS therapy on bladder symptoms after 12 weeks of treatment in a pediatric population with idiopathic overactive bladder syndrome (iOAB) and/or nocturnal enuresis (part I) and (2) to assess the effect of TTNS compared to PTNS (part II). In this article, we aim to present the protocol of the first part of the TaPaS trial (TTNS, PTNS, sham therapy). METHODS: Part I of the TaPaS trial is set up as a single-center randomized-controlled trial. Children, aged from 5 to 12 years with iOAB and/or nocturnal enuresis, are assigned to two groups by computer-generated randomization: TTNS therapy (intervention) and sham therapy (control). The primary outcome is the percentage difference in average voided volume (AVV) between baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. Secondary endpoints are the percentage difference in supervoid volumes, number of urinary incontinence episodes/24 h and in voiding frequency, the difference in parent reported outcomes between baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment, and the duration of clinical response. DISCUSSION: We hypothesize that TTNS is a non-inferior treatment for iOAB in children compared to PTNS therapy. Since literature is inconclusive about the efficacy of TTNS in a pediatric population, a sham-controlled RCT on TTNS will be conducted (part I). A protocol for a prospective randomized sham-controlled trial has been developed. Enrolment has started in November 2018. Study completion of part I is expected by August 2021. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT 04256876. Retrospectively registered on February 5, 2020. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-021-05117-8. BioMed Central 2021-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8017511/ /pubmed/33810804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05117-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Ghijselings, Lynn
Renson, Catherine
Van de Walle, Johan
Everaert, Karel
Spinoit, Anne-Françoise
Clinical efficacy of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) versus sham therapy (part I) and TTNS versus percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) (part II) on the short term in children with the idiopathic overactive bladder syndrome: protocol for part I of the twofold double-blinded randomized controlled TaPaS trial
title Clinical efficacy of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) versus sham therapy (part I) and TTNS versus percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) (part II) on the short term in children with the idiopathic overactive bladder syndrome: protocol for part I of the twofold double-blinded randomized controlled TaPaS trial
title_full Clinical efficacy of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) versus sham therapy (part I) and TTNS versus percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) (part II) on the short term in children with the idiopathic overactive bladder syndrome: protocol for part I of the twofold double-blinded randomized controlled TaPaS trial
title_fullStr Clinical efficacy of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) versus sham therapy (part I) and TTNS versus percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) (part II) on the short term in children with the idiopathic overactive bladder syndrome: protocol for part I of the twofold double-blinded randomized controlled TaPaS trial
title_full_unstemmed Clinical efficacy of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) versus sham therapy (part I) and TTNS versus percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) (part II) on the short term in children with the idiopathic overactive bladder syndrome: protocol for part I of the twofold double-blinded randomized controlled TaPaS trial
title_short Clinical efficacy of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) versus sham therapy (part I) and TTNS versus percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) (part II) on the short term in children with the idiopathic overactive bladder syndrome: protocol for part I of the twofold double-blinded randomized controlled TaPaS trial
title_sort clinical efficacy of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (ttns) versus sham therapy (part i) and ttns versus percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (ptns) (part ii) on the short term in children with the idiopathic overactive bladder syndrome: protocol for part i of the twofold double-blinded randomized controlled tapas trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8017511/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33810804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05117-8
work_keys_str_mv AT ghijselingslynn clinicalefficacyoftranscutaneoustibialnervestimulationttnsversusshamtherapypartiandttnsversuspercutaneoustibialnervestimulationptnspartiiontheshortterminchildrenwiththeidiopathicoveractivebladdersyndromeprotocolforpartiofthetwofolddoubleblindedrandomizedc
AT rensoncatherine clinicalefficacyoftranscutaneoustibialnervestimulationttnsversusshamtherapypartiandttnsversuspercutaneoustibialnervestimulationptnspartiiontheshortterminchildrenwiththeidiopathicoveractivebladdersyndromeprotocolforpartiofthetwofolddoubleblindedrandomizedc
AT vandewallejohan clinicalefficacyoftranscutaneoustibialnervestimulationttnsversusshamtherapypartiandttnsversuspercutaneoustibialnervestimulationptnspartiiontheshortterminchildrenwiththeidiopathicoveractivebladdersyndromeprotocolforpartiofthetwofolddoubleblindedrandomizedc
AT everaertkarel clinicalefficacyoftranscutaneoustibialnervestimulationttnsversusshamtherapypartiandttnsversuspercutaneoustibialnervestimulationptnspartiiontheshortterminchildrenwiththeidiopathicoveractivebladdersyndromeprotocolforpartiofthetwofolddoubleblindedrandomizedc
AT spinoitannefrancoise clinicalefficacyoftranscutaneoustibialnervestimulationttnsversusshamtherapypartiandttnsversuspercutaneoustibialnervestimulationptnspartiiontheshortterminchildrenwiththeidiopathicoveractivebladdersyndromeprotocolforpartiofthetwofolddoubleblindedrandomizedc