Cargando…
Clinical efficacy of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) versus sham therapy (part I) and TTNS versus percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) (part II) on the short term in children with the idiopathic overactive bladder syndrome: protocol for part I of the twofold double-blinded randomized controlled TaPaS trial
BACKGROUND: Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) are effective and safe therapies for overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome in adults. However, few randomized sham-controlled trials have been conducted in a pediatric population. To our knowledge...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8017511/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33810804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05117-8 |
_version_ | 1783674070034808832 |
---|---|
author | Ghijselings, Lynn Renson, Catherine Van de Walle, Johan Everaert, Karel Spinoit, Anne-Françoise |
author_facet | Ghijselings, Lynn Renson, Catherine Van de Walle, Johan Everaert, Karel Spinoit, Anne-Françoise |
author_sort | Ghijselings, Lynn |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) are effective and safe therapies for overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome in adults. However, few randomized sham-controlled trials have been conducted in a pediatric population. To our knowledge, both therapies never have been compared in children. AIM: The aim of the complete study is twofold: (1) to assess the efficacy of TTNS therapy on bladder symptoms after 12 weeks of treatment in a pediatric population with idiopathic overactive bladder syndrome (iOAB) and/or nocturnal enuresis (part I) and (2) to assess the effect of TTNS compared to PTNS (part II). In this article, we aim to present the protocol of the first part of the TaPaS trial (TTNS, PTNS, sham therapy). METHODS: Part I of the TaPaS trial is set up as a single-center randomized-controlled trial. Children, aged from 5 to 12 years with iOAB and/or nocturnal enuresis, are assigned to two groups by computer-generated randomization: TTNS therapy (intervention) and sham therapy (control). The primary outcome is the percentage difference in average voided volume (AVV) between baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. Secondary endpoints are the percentage difference in supervoid volumes, number of urinary incontinence episodes/24 h and in voiding frequency, the difference in parent reported outcomes between baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment, and the duration of clinical response. DISCUSSION: We hypothesize that TTNS is a non-inferior treatment for iOAB in children compared to PTNS therapy. Since literature is inconclusive about the efficacy of TTNS in a pediatric population, a sham-controlled RCT on TTNS will be conducted (part I). A protocol for a prospective randomized sham-controlled trial has been developed. Enrolment has started in November 2018. Study completion of part I is expected by August 2021. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT 04256876. Retrospectively registered on February 5, 2020. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-021-05117-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8017511 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80175112021-04-02 Clinical efficacy of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) versus sham therapy (part I) and TTNS versus percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) (part II) on the short term in children with the idiopathic overactive bladder syndrome: protocol for part I of the twofold double-blinded randomized controlled TaPaS trial Ghijselings, Lynn Renson, Catherine Van de Walle, Johan Everaert, Karel Spinoit, Anne-Françoise Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) are effective and safe therapies for overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome in adults. However, few randomized sham-controlled trials have been conducted in a pediatric population. To our knowledge, both therapies never have been compared in children. AIM: The aim of the complete study is twofold: (1) to assess the efficacy of TTNS therapy on bladder symptoms after 12 weeks of treatment in a pediatric population with idiopathic overactive bladder syndrome (iOAB) and/or nocturnal enuresis (part I) and (2) to assess the effect of TTNS compared to PTNS (part II). In this article, we aim to present the protocol of the first part of the TaPaS trial (TTNS, PTNS, sham therapy). METHODS: Part I of the TaPaS trial is set up as a single-center randomized-controlled trial. Children, aged from 5 to 12 years with iOAB and/or nocturnal enuresis, are assigned to two groups by computer-generated randomization: TTNS therapy (intervention) and sham therapy (control). The primary outcome is the percentage difference in average voided volume (AVV) between baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. Secondary endpoints are the percentage difference in supervoid volumes, number of urinary incontinence episodes/24 h and in voiding frequency, the difference in parent reported outcomes between baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment, and the duration of clinical response. DISCUSSION: We hypothesize that TTNS is a non-inferior treatment for iOAB in children compared to PTNS therapy. Since literature is inconclusive about the efficacy of TTNS in a pediatric population, a sham-controlled RCT on TTNS will be conducted (part I). A protocol for a prospective randomized sham-controlled trial has been developed. Enrolment has started in November 2018. Study completion of part I is expected by August 2021. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT 04256876. Retrospectively registered on February 5, 2020. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-021-05117-8. BioMed Central 2021-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8017511/ /pubmed/33810804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05117-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Ghijselings, Lynn Renson, Catherine Van de Walle, Johan Everaert, Karel Spinoit, Anne-Françoise Clinical efficacy of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) versus sham therapy (part I) and TTNS versus percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) (part II) on the short term in children with the idiopathic overactive bladder syndrome: protocol for part I of the twofold double-blinded randomized controlled TaPaS trial |
title | Clinical efficacy of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) versus sham therapy (part I) and TTNS versus percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) (part II) on the short term in children with the idiopathic overactive bladder syndrome: protocol for part I of the twofold double-blinded randomized controlled TaPaS trial |
title_full | Clinical efficacy of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) versus sham therapy (part I) and TTNS versus percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) (part II) on the short term in children with the idiopathic overactive bladder syndrome: protocol for part I of the twofold double-blinded randomized controlled TaPaS trial |
title_fullStr | Clinical efficacy of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) versus sham therapy (part I) and TTNS versus percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) (part II) on the short term in children with the idiopathic overactive bladder syndrome: protocol for part I of the twofold double-blinded randomized controlled TaPaS trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical efficacy of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) versus sham therapy (part I) and TTNS versus percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) (part II) on the short term in children with the idiopathic overactive bladder syndrome: protocol for part I of the twofold double-blinded randomized controlled TaPaS trial |
title_short | Clinical efficacy of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) versus sham therapy (part I) and TTNS versus percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) (part II) on the short term in children with the idiopathic overactive bladder syndrome: protocol for part I of the twofold double-blinded randomized controlled TaPaS trial |
title_sort | clinical efficacy of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (ttns) versus sham therapy (part i) and ttns versus percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (ptns) (part ii) on the short term in children with the idiopathic overactive bladder syndrome: protocol for part i of the twofold double-blinded randomized controlled tapas trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8017511/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33810804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05117-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ghijselingslynn clinicalefficacyoftranscutaneoustibialnervestimulationttnsversusshamtherapypartiandttnsversuspercutaneoustibialnervestimulationptnspartiiontheshortterminchildrenwiththeidiopathicoveractivebladdersyndromeprotocolforpartiofthetwofolddoubleblindedrandomizedc AT rensoncatherine clinicalefficacyoftranscutaneoustibialnervestimulationttnsversusshamtherapypartiandttnsversuspercutaneoustibialnervestimulationptnspartiiontheshortterminchildrenwiththeidiopathicoveractivebladdersyndromeprotocolforpartiofthetwofolddoubleblindedrandomizedc AT vandewallejohan clinicalefficacyoftranscutaneoustibialnervestimulationttnsversusshamtherapypartiandttnsversuspercutaneoustibialnervestimulationptnspartiiontheshortterminchildrenwiththeidiopathicoveractivebladdersyndromeprotocolforpartiofthetwofolddoubleblindedrandomizedc AT everaertkarel clinicalefficacyoftranscutaneoustibialnervestimulationttnsversusshamtherapypartiandttnsversuspercutaneoustibialnervestimulationptnspartiiontheshortterminchildrenwiththeidiopathicoveractivebladdersyndromeprotocolforpartiofthetwofolddoubleblindedrandomizedc AT spinoitannefrancoise clinicalefficacyoftranscutaneoustibialnervestimulationttnsversusshamtherapypartiandttnsversuspercutaneoustibialnervestimulationptnspartiiontheshortterminchildrenwiththeidiopathicoveractivebladdersyndromeprotocolforpartiofthetwofolddoubleblindedrandomizedc |