Cargando…
Practical strategies for handling breakdown of multiple imputation procedures
Multiple imputation is a recommended method for handling incomplete data problems. One of the barriers to its successful use is the breakdown of the multiple imputation procedure, often due to numerical problems with the algorithms used within the imputation process. These problems frequently occur...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8017730/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33794933 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12982-021-00095-3 |
_version_ | 1783674104068440064 |
---|---|
author | Nguyen, Cattram D. Carlin, John B. Lee, Katherine J. |
author_facet | Nguyen, Cattram D. Carlin, John B. Lee, Katherine J. |
author_sort | Nguyen, Cattram D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Multiple imputation is a recommended method for handling incomplete data problems. One of the barriers to its successful use is the breakdown of the multiple imputation procedure, often due to numerical problems with the algorithms used within the imputation process. These problems frequently occur when imputation models contain large numbers of variables, especially with the popular approach of multivariate imputation by chained equations. This paper describes common causes of failure of the imputation procedure including perfect prediction and collinearity, focusing on issues when using Stata software. We outline a number of strategies for addressing these issues, including imputation of composite variables instead of individual components, introducing prior information and changing the form of the imputation model. These strategies are illustrated using a case study based on data from the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12982-021-00095-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8017730 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80177302021-04-02 Practical strategies for handling breakdown of multiple imputation procedures Nguyen, Cattram D. Carlin, John B. Lee, Katherine J. Emerg Themes Epidemiol Analytic Perspective Multiple imputation is a recommended method for handling incomplete data problems. One of the barriers to its successful use is the breakdown of the multiple imputation procedure, often due to numerical problems with the algorithms used within the imputation process. These problems frequently occur when imputation models contain large numbers of variables, especially with the popular approach of multivariate imputation by chained equations. This paper describes common causes of failure of the imputation procedure including perfect prediction and collinearity, focusing on issues when using Stata software. We outline a number of strategies for addressing these issues, including imputation of composite variables instead of individual components, introducing prior information and changing the form of the imputation model. These strategies are illustrated using a case study based on data from the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12982-021-00095-3. BioMed Central 2021-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8017730/ /pubmed/33794933 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12982-021-00095-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Analytic Perspective Nguyen, Cattram D. Carlin, John B. Lee, Katherine J. Practical strategies for handling breakdown of multiple imputation procedures |
title | Practical strategies for handling breakdown of multiple imputation procedures |
title_full | Practical strategies for handling breakdown of multiple imputation procedures |
title_fullStr | Practical strategies for handling breakdown of multiple imputation procedures |
title_full_unstemmed | Practical strategies for handling breakdown of multiple imputation procedures |
title_short | Practical strategies for handling breakdown of multiple imputation procedures |
title_sort | practical strategies for handling breakdown of multiple imputation procedures |
topic | Analytic Perspective |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8017730/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33794933 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12982-021-00095-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nguyencattramd practicalstrategiesforhandlingbreakdownofmultipleimputationprocedures AT carlinjohnb practicalstrategiesforhandlingbreakdownofmultipleimputationprocedures AT leekatherinej practicalstrategiesforhandlingbreakdownofmultipleimputationprocedures |