Cargando…
Cochlea sparing optimized radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma
BACKGROUND: Definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is standard of care for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Due to the tumor localization and concomitant platinum-based chemotherapy, hearing impairment is a frequent complication, without defined dose-threshold. In this study, we aimed to achieve the maximum po...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8017833/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33794949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01796-4 |
_version_ | 1783674125481410560 |
---|---|
author | Lamaj, Enkelejda Vu, Erwin van Timmeren, Janita E. Leonardi, Chiara Marc, Louise Pytko, Izabela Guckenberger, Matthias Balermpas, Panagiotis |
author_facet | Lamaj, Enkelejda Vu, Erwin van Timmeren, Janita E. Leonardi, Chiara Marc, Louise Pytko, Izabela Guckenberger, Matthias Balermpas, Panagiotis |
author_sort | Lamaj, Enkelejda |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is standard of care for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Due to the tumor localization and concomitant platinum-based chemotherapy, hearing impairment is a frequent complication, without defined dose-threshold. In this study, we aimed to achieve the maximum possible cochleae sparing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Treatment plans of 20 patients, treated with CRT (6 IMRT and 14 VMAT) based on the QUANTEC organs-at-risk constraints were investigated. The cochleae were re-delineated independently by two radiation oncologists, whereas target volumes and other organs at risk (OARs) were not changed. The initial plans, aiming to a mean cochlea dose < 45 Gy, were re-optimized with VMAT, using 2–2.5 arcs without compromising the dose coverage of the target volume. Mean cochlea dose, PTV coverage, Homogeneity Index, Conformity Index and dose to other OAR were compared to the reference plans. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to evaluate differences, a p value < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: The re-optimized plans achieved a statistically significant lower dose for both cochleae (median dose for left and right 14.97 Gy and 18.47 Gy vs. 24.09 Gy and 26.05 Gy respectively, p < 0.001) compared to the reference plans, without compromising other plan quality parameters. The median NTCP for tinnitus of the most exposed sites was 11.3% (range 3.52–91.1%) for the original plans, compared to 4.60% (range 1.46–90.1%) for the re-optimized plans (p < 0.001). For hearing loss, the median NTCP of the most exposed sites could be improved from 0.03% (range 0–99.0%) to 0.00% (range 0–98.5%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A significantly improved cochlea sparing beyond current QUANTEC constraints is feasible without compromising the PTV dose coverage in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated with VMAT. As there appears to be no threshold for hearing toxicity after CRT, this should be considered for future treatment planning. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-021-01796-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8017833 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80178332021-04-05 Cochlea sparing optimized radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma Lamaj, Enkelejda Vu, Erwin van Timmeren, Janita E. Leonardi, Chiara Marc, Louise Pytko, Izabela Guckenberger, Matthias Balermpas, Panagiotis Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is standard of care for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Due to the tumor localization and concomitant platinum-based chemotherapy, hearing impairment is a frequent complication, without defined dose-threshold. In this study, we aimed to achieve the maximum possible cochleae sparing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Treatment plans of 20 patients, treated with CRT (6 IMRT and 14 VMAT) based on the QUANTEC organs-at-risk constraints were investigated. The cochleae were re-delineated independently by two radiation oncologists, whereas target volumes and other organs at risk (OARs) were not changed. The initial plans, aiming to a mean cochlea dose < 45 Gy, were re-optimized with VMAT, using 2–2.5 arcs without compromising the dose coverage of the target volume. Mean cochlea dose, PTV coverage, Homogeneity Index, Conformity Index and dose to other OAR were compared to the reference plans. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to evaluate differences, a p value < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: The re-optimized plans achieved a statistically significant lower dose for both cochleae (median dose for left and right 14.97 Gy and 18.47 Gy vs. 24.09 Gy and 26.05 Gy respectively, p < 0.001) compared to the reference plans, without compromising other plan quality parameters. The median NTCP for tinnitus of the most exposed sites was 11.3% (range 3.52–91.1%) for the original plans, compared to 4.60% (range 1.46–90.1%) for the re-optimized plans (p < 0.001). For hearing loss, the median NTCP of the most exposed sites could be improved from 0.03% (range 0–99.0%) to 0.00% (range 0–98.5%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A significantly improved cochlea sparing beyond current QUANTEC constraints is feasible without compromising the PTV dose coverage in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated with VMAT. As there appears to be no threshold for hearing toxicity after CRT, this should be considered for future treatment planning. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-021-01796-4. BioMed Central 2021-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8017833/ /pubmed/33794949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01796-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Lamaj, Enkelejda Vu, Erwin van Timmeren, Janita E. Leonardi, Chiara Marc, Louise Pytko, Izabela Guckenberger, Matthias Balermpas, Panagiotis Cochlea sparing optimized radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma |
title | Cochlea sparing optimized radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma |
title_full | Cochlea sparing optimized radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma |
title_fullStr | Cochlea sparing optimized radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Cochlea sparing optimized radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma |
title_short | Cochlea sparing optimized radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma |
title_sort | cochlea sparing optimized radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8017833/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33794949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01796-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lamajenkelejda cochleasparingoptimizedradiotherapyfornasopharyngealcarcinoma AT vuerwin cochleasparingoptimizedradiotherapyfornasopharyngealcarcinoma AT vantimmerenjanitae cochleasparingoptimizedradiotherapyfornasopharyngealcarcinoma AT leonardichiara cochleasparingoptimizedradiotherapyfornasopharyngealcarcinoma AT marclouise cochleasparingoptimizedradiotherapyfornasopharyngealcarcinoma AT pytkoizabela cochleasparingoptimizedradiotherapyfornasopharyngealcarcinoma AT guckenbergermatthias cochleasparingoptimizedradiotherapyfornasopharyngealcarcinoma AT balermpaspanagiotis cochleasparingoptimizedradiotherapyfornasopharyngealcarcinoma |