Cargando…

Cochlea sparing optimized radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is standard of care for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Due to the tumor localization and concomitant platinum-based chemotherapy, hearing impairment is a frequent complication, without defined dose-threshold. In this study, we aimed to achieve the maximum po...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lamaj, Enkelejda, Vu, Erwin, van Timmeren, Janita E., Leonardi, Chiara, Marc, Louise, Pytko, Izabela, Guckenberger, Matthias, Balermpas, Panagiotis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8017833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33794949
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01796-4
_version_ 1783674125481410560
author Lamaj, Enkelejda
Vu, Erwin
van Timmeren, Janita E.
Leonardi, Chiara
Marc, Louise
Pytko, Izabela
Guckenberger, Matthias
Balermpas, Panagiotis
author_facet Lamaj, Enkelejda
Vu, Erwin
van Timmeren, Janita E.
Leonardi, Chiara
Marc, Louise
Pytko, Izabela
Guckenberger, Matthias
Balermpas, Panagiotis
author_sort Lamaj, Enkelejda
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is standard of care for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Due to the tumor localization and concomitant platinum-based chemotherapy, hearing impairment is a frequent complication, without defined dose-threshold. In this study, we aimed to achieve the maximum possible cochleae sparing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Treatment plans of 20 patients, treated with CRT (6 IMRT and 14 VMAT) based on the QUANTEC organs-at-risk constraints were investigated. The cochleae were re-delineated independently by two radiation oncologists, whereas target volumes and other organs at risk (OARs) were not changed. The initial plans, aiming to a mean cochlea dose < 45 Gy, were re-optimized with VMAT, using 2–2.5 arcs without compromising the dose coverage of the target volume. Mean cochlea dose, PTV coverage, Homogeneity Index, Conformity Index and dose to other OAR were compared to the reference plans. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to evaluate differences, a p value < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: The re-optimized plans achieved a statistically significant lower dose for both cochleae (median dose for left and right 14.97 Gy and 18.47 Gy vs. 24.09 Gy and 26.05 Gy respectively, p < 0.001) compared to the reference plans, without compromising other plan quality parameters. The median NTCP for tinnitus of the most exposed sites was 11.3% (range 3.52–91.1%) for the original plans, compared to 4.60% (range 1.46–90.1%) for the re-optimized plans (p < 0.001). For hearing loss, the median NTCP of the most exposed sites could be improved from 0.03% (range 0–99.0%) to 0.00% (range 0–98.5%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A significantly improved cochlea sparing beyond current QUANTEC constraints is feasible without compromising the PTV dose coverage in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated with VMAT. As there appears to be no threshold for hearing toxicity after CRT, this should be considered for future treatment planning. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-021-01796-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8017833
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80178332021-04-05 Cochlea sparing optimized radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma Lamaj, Enkelejda Vu, Erwin van Timmeren, Janita E. Leonardi, Chiara Marc, Louise Pytko, Izabela Guckenberger, Matthias Balermpas, Panagiotis Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is standard of care for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Due to the tumor localization and concomitant platinum-based chemotherapy, hearing impairment is a frequent complication, without defined dose-threshold. In this study, we aimed to achieve the maximum possible cochleae sparing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Treatment plans of 20 patients, treated with CRT (6 IMRT and 14 VMAT) based on the QUANTEC organs-at-risk constraints were investigated. The cochleae were re-delineated independently by two radiation oncologists, whereas target volumes and other organs at risk (OARs) were not changed. The initial plans, aiming to a mean cochlea dose < 45 Gy, were re-optimized with VMAT, using 2–2.5 arcs without compromising the dose coverage of the target volume. Mean cochlea dose, PTV coverage, Homogeneity Index, Conformity Index and dose to other OAR were compared to the reference plans. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to evaluate differences, a p value < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: The re-optimized plans achieved a statistically significant lower dose for both cochleae (median dose for left and right 14.97 Gy and 18.47 Gy vs. 24.09 Gy and 26.05 Gy respectively, p < 0.001) compared to the reference plans, without compromising other plan quality parameters. The median NTCP for tinnitus of the most exposed sites was 11.3% (range 3.52–91.1%) for the original plans, compared to 4.60% (range 1.46–90.1%) for the re-optimized plans (p < 0.001). For hearing loss, the median NTCP of the most exposed sites could be improved from 0.03% (range 0–99.0%) to 0.00% (range 0–98.5%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A significantly improved cochlea sparing beyond current QUANTEC constraints is feasible without compromising the PTV dose coverage in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated with VMAT. As there appears to be no threshold for hearing toxicity after CRT, this should be considered for future treatment planning. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-021-01796-4. BioMed Central 2021-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8017833/ /pubmed/33794949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01796-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Lamaj, Enkelejda
Vu, Erwin
van Timmeren, Janita E.
Leonardi, Chiara
Marc, Louise
Pytko, Izabela
Guckenberger, Matthias
Balermpas, Panagiotis
Cochlea sparing optimized radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma
title Cochlea sparing optimized radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma
title_full Cochlea sparing optimized radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma
title_fullStr Cochlea sparing optimized radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Cochlea sparing optimized radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma
title_short Cochlea sparing optimized radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma
title_sort cochlea sparing optimized radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8017833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33794949
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01796-4
work_keys_str_mv AT lamajenkelejda cochleasparingoptimizedradiotherapyfornasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT vuerwin cochleasparingoptimizedradiotherapyfornasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT vantimmerenjanitae cochleasparingoptimizedradiotherapyfornasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT leonardichiara cochleasparingoptimizedradiotherapyfornasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT marclouise cochleasparingoptimizedradiotherapyfornasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT pytkoizabela cochleasparingoptimizedradiotherapyfornasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT guckenbergermatthias cochleasparingoptimizedradiotherapyfornasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT balermpaspanagiotis cochleasparingoptimizedradiotherapyfornasopharyngealcarcinoma