Cargando…

A multicenter study of romiplostim for chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia in solid tumor s and hematologic malignancies

Chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) frequently complicates cancer treatment causing chemotherapy treatment delays, dose reductions, and discontinuation. There is no US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved agent available to manage CIT. This study retrospectively evaluated patients wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Al-Samkari, Hanny, Parnes, Aric D., Goodarzi, Katayoon, Weitzman, James I., Connors, Jean M., Kuter, David J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Fondazione Ferrata Storti 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8018116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32499239
http://dx.doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2020.251900
Descripción
Sumario:Chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) frequently complicates cancer treatment causing chemotherapy treatment delays, dose reductions, and discontinuation. There is no US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved agent available to manage CIT. This study retrospectively evaluated patients with CIT treated on institutional romiplostim treatment pathways at four US centers. The primary outcome was achievement of a romiplostim response (median on-romiplostim platelet count ≥75x10(9)/L and ≥30x10(9)/L above baseline). Secondary outcomes included time to platelet count ≥100x10(9)/L and rates of the following: platelet count <100×10(9)/L, platelet count <75x10(9)/L, platelet count <50x10(9)/L, thrombocytosis, chemotherapy dose reduction/treatment delay, platelet transfusion, bleeding, and thromboembolism. Multivariable regression was used to identify predictors of romiplostim non-response and compare weekly dosing with intracycle/intermittent dosing. A total of 173 patients (153 solid tumor, 20 lymphoma or myeloma) were treated, with 170 (98%) receiving a median of four (range: 1-36) additional chemotherapy cycles on romiplostim. Romiplostim was effective in solid tumor patients: 71% of patients achieved a romiplostim response, 79% avoided chemotherapy dose reductions/treatment delays, and 89% avoided platelet transfusions. Median per-patient platelet count on romiplostim was significantly higher than baseline (116x10(9)/L vs. 60x10(9)/L; P<0.001). Bone marrow (BM) tumor invasion, prior pelvic irradiation, and prior temozolomide exposure predicted romiplostim non-response. Bleeding rates were lower than historical CIT cohorts and thrombosis rates were not elevated. Weekly dosing was superior to intracycle dosing with higher response rates and less chemotherapy dose reductions/treatment delays/bleeding; intracycle dosing had an incidence rate ratio (IRR) for dose reduction/treatment delay of 3.00 (95%CI: 1.30-6.91; P=0.010) and an IRR for bleeding of 4.84 (95%CI: 1.18-19.89, P=0.029) compared with weekly dosing. Blunted response (10% response rate) was seen in non-myeloid hematologic malignancy patients with BM involvement. In conclusion, romiplostim was safe and effective for CIT in most solid tumor patients.