Cargando…

Teledermatology in Times of COVID-19 Confinement: Comparing Patients' and Physicians' Satisfaction by the Standardized Brest Teledermatology Questionnaire

The French government imposed the first COVID-19 pandemic lockdown from March 17 until May 11, 2020. Only emergency cases and teledermatology (TD) were allowed in outpatient settings. A standardized questionnaire was developed to compare the satisfaction level of patients and their treating physicia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fluhr, Joachim W., Gueguen, Annie, Legoupil, Delphine, Brenaut, Emilie, Abasq, Claire, Araújo, Helena, Misery, Laurent
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: S. Karger AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8018192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33567427
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000514029
_version_ 1783674169094832128
author Fluhr, Joachim W.
Gueguen, Annie
Legoupil, Delphine
Brenaut, Emilie
Abasq, Claire
Araújo, Helena
Misery, Laurent
author_facet Fluhr, Joachim W.
Gueguen, Annie
Legoupil, Delphine
Brenaut, Emilie
Abasq, Claire
Araújo, Helena
Misery, Laurent
author_sort Fluhr, Joachim W.
collection PubMed
description The French government imposed the first COVID-19 pandemic lockdown from March 17 until May 11, 2020. Only emergency cases and teledermatology (TD) were allowed in outpatient settings. A standardized questionnaire was developed to compare the satisfaction level of patients and their treating physicians. Our main question was whether the patients would perceive TD as a valid alternative for direct physical face-to-face consultation. Eighty-two patients and their 4 treating dermatologists from one dermatology department participated in the study (43 females, 39 males) with a mean age of 46.6 years (SD ±23.9). The reason for TD was a chronic disease in the majority (87.8%), and mainly as a follow-up (96.3%). Regarding satisfaction, almost all categories rated around 9 on a 0–10 verbal analogue scale. The same level of global satisfaction could be seen between the patients and the physicians as well as for the quality of the patient-physician relation and whether all questions could be addressed during the TC. Physicians showed significantly higher scores than patients only for the category of “length” of the consultation. Gender, age, as well as distance between the clinic and home of the patient were not influencing factors for satisfaction. Regarding the technical parameters, the evaluation was mostly comparable for patients and physicians, but overall lower than the relational satisfaction parameters, especially for image quality. Patients were significantly more motivated to continue the TD after the lockdown than their treating dermatologists. We see an interest for implementing TD in specialized centers with chronic patients coming from remote places for regular follow-ups. TD cannot replace in-person patient-physician interaction, but was helpful during the lockdown. As a result, TD might become part of dermatology training to prepare for future lockdown situations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8018192
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher S. Karger AG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80181922021-04-05 Teledermatology in Times of COVID-19 Confinement: Comparing Patients' and Physicians' Satisfaction by the Standardized Brest Teledermatology Questionnaire Fluhr, Joachim W. Gueguen, Annie Legoupil, Delphine Brenaut, Emilie Abasq, Claire Araújo, Helena Misery, Laurent Dermatology Outcome Measures − Research Article The French government imposed the first COVID-19 pandemic lockdown from March 17 until May 11, 2020. Only emergency cases and teledermatology (TD) were allowed in outpatient settings. A standardized questionnaire was developed to compare the satisfaction level of patients and their treating physicians. Our main question was whether the patients would perceive TD as a valid alternative for direct physical face-to-face consultation. Eighty-two patients and their 4 treating dermatologists from one dermatology department participated in the study (43 females, 39 males) with a mean age of 46.6 years (SD ±23.9). The reason for TD was a chronic disease in the majority (87.8%), and mainly as a follow-up (96.3%). Regarding satisfaction, almost all categories rated around 9 on a 0–10 verbal analogue scale. The same level of global satisfaction could be seen between the patients and the physicians as well as for the quality of the patient-physician relation and whether all questions could be addressed during the TC. Physicians showed significantly higher scores than patients only for the category of “length” of the consultation. Gender, age, as well as distance between the clinic and home of the patient were not influencing factors for satisfaction. Regarding the technical parameters, the evaluation was mostly comparable for patients and physicians, but overall lower than the relational satisfaction parameters, especially for image quality. Patients were significantly more motivated to continue the TD after the lockdown than their treating dermatologists. We see an interest for implementing TD in specialized centers with chronic patients coming from remote places for regular follow-ups. TD cannot replace in-person patient-physician interaction, but was helpful during the lockdown. As a result, TD might become part of dermatology training to prepare for future lockdown situations. S. Karger AG 2021-03 2021-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8018192/ /pubmed/33567427 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000514029 Text en Copyright © 2021 by S. Karger AG, Basel https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes requires written permission. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
spellingShingle Outcome Measures − Research Article
Fluhr, Joachim W.
Gueguen, Annie
Legoupil, Delphine
Brenaut, Emilie
Abasq, Claire
Araújo, Helena
Misery, Laurent
Teledermatology in Times of COVID-19 Confinement: Comparing Patients' and Physicians' Satisfaction by the Standardized Brest Teledermatology Questionnaire
title Teledermatology in Times of COVID-19 Confinement: Comparing Patients' and Physicians' Satisfaction by the Standardized Brest Teledermatology Questionnaire
title_full Teledermatology in Times of COVID-19 Confinement: Comparing Patients' and Physicians' Satisfaction by the Standardized Brest Teledermatology Questionnaire
title_fullStr Teledermatology in Times of COVID-19 Confinement: Comparing Patients' and Physicians' Satisfaction by the Standardized Brest Teledermatology Questionnaire
title_full_unstemmed Teledermatology in Times of COVID-19 Confinement: Comparing Patients' and Physicians' Satisfaction by the Standardized Brest Teledermatology Questionnaire
title_short Teledermatology in Times of COVID-19 Confinement: Comparing Patients' and Physicians' Satisfaction by the Standardized Brest Teledermatology Questionnaire
title_sort teledermatology in times of covid-19 confinement: comparing patients' and physicians' satisfaction by the standardized brest teledermatology questionnaire
topic Outcome Measures − Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8018192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33567427
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000514029
work_keys_str_mv AT fluhrjoachimw teledermatologyintimesofcovid19confinementcomparingpatientsandphysicianssatisfactionbythestandardizedbrestteledermatologyquestionnaire
AT gueguenannie teledermatologyintimesofcovid19confinementcomparingpatientsandphysicianssatisfactionbythestandardizedbrestteledermatologyquestionnaire
AT legoupildelphine teledermatologyintimesofcovid19confinementcomparingpatientsandphysicianssatisfactionbythestandardizedbrestteledermatologyquestionnaire
AT brenautemilie teledermatologyintimesofcovid19confinementcomparingpatientsandphysicianssatisfactionbythestandardizedbrestteledermatologyquestionnaire
AT abasqclaire teledermatologyintimesofcovid19confinementcomparingpatientsandphysicianssatisfactionbythestandardizedbrestteledermatologyquestionnaire
AT araujohelena teledermatologyintimesofcovid19confinementcomparingpatientsandphysicianssatisfactionbythestandardizedbrestteledermatologyquestionnaire
AT miserylaurent teledermatologyintimesofcovid19confinementcomparingpatientsandphysicianssatisfactionbythestandardizedbrestteledermatologyquestionnaire