Cargando…

Impact of refusal to vaccine in the neonatal period on the implementation of the vaccination calendar in the first year of life

INTRODUCTION: The level of vaccination coverage with obligatory preparations in Poland reaches 98%. This is facilitated by the introduction of the Individual Vaccination Calendar (IVC) compliant with medical contraindications to vaccination. AIM: The aim of the study was to assess whether the refusa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Więckowska (Pająk), Agata, Królak-Olejnik, Barbara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8018495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33074768
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2020.1804246
_version_ 1783674214395412480
author Więckowska (Pająk), Agata
Królak-Olejnik, Barbara
author_facet Więckowska (Pająk), Agata
Królak-Olejnik, Barbara
author_sort Więckowska (Pająk), Agata
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The level of vaccination coverage with obligatory preparations in Poland reaches 98%. This is facilitated by the introduction of the Individual Vaccination Calendar (IVC) compliant with medical contraindications to vaccination. AIM: The aim of the study was to assess whether the refusal of vaccinations after birth has an impact on the proper implementation of the vaccination calendar in the first year of life. METHODS: The study involved healthy, term newborns who were born in the Department of Neonatology in 2011–2015. There were 156 patients enrolled to the study. Among them, 133 were in the control group – vaccinated after birth, and 23 constituted the study group – not vaccinated after birth. RESULTS: Not all healthy newborns are vaccinated after birth, statistical significance was obtained between the study and control group (p < 0,00001). Only 48% of patients not vaccinated after birth received TB-vaccine during the first year (p < 0,00053). Parents of 26% of infants in the study and of 2% of infants in the control group declared using the IVC (p < 0,001). CONCLUSIONS: 1. Proper implementation of the vaccination schedule in the first year of life results from the initiation of vaccinations after birth. 2. Unreasonable introduction of the IVC promotes incorrect timing of mandatory vaccinations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8018495
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80184952021-04-13 Impact of refusal to vaccine in the neonatal period on the implementation of the vaccination calendar in the first year of life Więckowska (Pająk), Agata Królak-Olejnik, Barbara Hum Vaccin Immunother Short Report INTRODUCTION: The level of vaccination coverage with obligatory preparations in Poland reaches 98%. This is facilitated by the introduction of the Individual Vaccination Calendar (IVC) compliant with medical contraindications to vaccination. AIM: The aim of the study was to assess whether the refusal of vaccinations after birth has an impact on the proper implementation of the vaccination calendar in the first year of life. METHODS: The study involved healthy, term newborns who were born in the Department of Neonatology in 2011–2015. There were 156 patients enrolled to the study. Among them, 133 were in the control group – vaccinated after birth, and 23 constituted the study group – not vaccinated after birth. RESULTS: Not all healthy newborns are vaccinated after birth, statistical significance was obtained between the study and control group (p < 0,00001). Only 48% of patients not vaccinated after birth received TB-vaccine during the first year (p < 0,00053). Parents of 26% of infants in the study and of 2% of infants in the control group declared using the IVC (p < 0,001). CONCLUSIONS: 1. Proper implementation of the vaccination schedule in the first year of life results from the initiation of vaccinations after birth. 2. Unreasonable introduction of the IVC promotes incorrect timing of mandatory vaccinations. Taylor & Francis 2020-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8018495/ /pubmed/33074768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2020.1804246 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.
spellingShingle Short Report
Więckowska (Pająk), Agata
Królak-Olejnik, Barbara
Impact of refusal to vaccine in the neonatal period on the implementation of the vaccination calendar in the first year of life
title Impact of refusal to vaccine in the neonatal period on the implementation of the vaccination calendar in the first year of life
title_full Impact of refusal to vaccine in the neonatal period on the implementation of the vaccination calendar in the first year of life
title_fullStr Impact of refusal to vaccine in the neonatal period on the implementation of the vaccination calendar in the first year of life
title_full_unstemmed Impact of refusal to vaccine in the neonatal period on the implementation of the vaccination calendar in the first year of life
title_short Impact of refusal to vaccine in the neonatal period on the implementation of the vaccination calendar in the first year of life
title_sort impact of refusal to vaccine in the neonatal period on the implementation of the vaccination calendar in the first year of life
topic Short Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8018495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33074768
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2020.1804246
work_keys_str_mv AT wieckowskapajakagata impactofrefusaltovaccineintheneonatalperiodontheimplementationofthevaccinationcalendarinthefirstyearoflife
AT krolakolejnikbarbara impactofrefusaltovaccineintheneonatalperiodontheimplementationofthevaccinationcalendarinthefirstyearoflife