Cargando…
The Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes With 5-Fluorouracil–Associated Coronary Vasospasm
BACKGROUND: Coronary vasospasm is a recognized side effect of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). There are limited and conflicting data on the incidence, risk factors, and prognostic effect of 5-FU–associated vasospasm. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the incidence, risk factors, and prognostic implicat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8018593/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33817666 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccao.2020.12.005 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Coronary vasospasm is a recognized side effect of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). There are limited and conflicting data on the incidence, risk factors, and prognostic effect of 5-FU–associated vasospasm. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the incidence, risk factors, and prognostic implications of 5-FU coronary vasospasm among patients receiving 5-FU regimens at a single tertiary care center. METHODS: The study conducted a retrospective analysis of all patients who received 5-FU at a single academic center from January 2009 to July 2019. Vasospasm was defined as the occurrence of a typical chest pain syndrome in the presence of 5-FU. The presence of associated electrocardiogram changes or elevated biomarkers was used to further confirm the diagnosis. Patients with vasospasm were compared with patients treated with 5-FU without vasospasm in a 1:2 ratio. Data regarding demographics, medical history, and follow-up were collected by manual chart review. RESULTS: From approximately 4,019 individual patients who received 5-FU from 2009 to 2019 at a single center, 87 (2.16%) developed vasospasm. Patients who developed vasospasm were younger (age 58 ± 13 years vs. 64 ± 13 years; p = 0.001) and were less likely to have any cardiovascular risk factors (70.1% vs. 84.5%; p = 0.007). Patients with vasospasm and patients without vasospasm were otherwise similar in terms of types of cancer, stage of cancer, sex, and race. There was no significant difference in progression-free survival, overall mortality or cancer specific mortality between patients who developed vasospasm versus those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: In a large, single-center report of 5-FU–associated vasospasm, patients who developed vasospasm were younger, had lower rates of traditional cardiovascular risk factors, and had no significant difference in progression-free or overall survival compared with those who did not develop vasospasm. |
---|