Cargando…

The Neurophysiological Representation of Imagined Somatosensory Percepts in Human Cortex

Intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) in human primary somatosensory cortex (S1) has been used to successfully evoke naturalistic sensations. However, the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the evoked sensations remain unknown. To understand how specific stimulation parameters elicit certain s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bashford, Luke, Rosenthal, Isabelle, Kellis, Spencer, Pejsa, Kelsie, Kramer, Daniel, Lee, Brian, Liu, Charles, Andersen, Richard A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society for Neuroscience 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8018772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33483431
http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2460-20.2021
_version_ 1783674251540168704
author Bashford, Luke
Rosenthal, Isabelle
Kellis, Spencer
Pejsa, Kelsie
Kramer, Daniel
Lee, Brian
Liu, Charles
Andersen, Richard A.
author_facet Bashford, Luke
Rosenthal, Isabelle
Kellis, Spencer
Pejsa, Kelsie
Kramer, Daniel
Lee, Brian
Liu, Charles
Andersen, Richard A.
author_sort Bashford, Luke
collection PubMed
description Intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) in human primary somatosensory cortex (S1) has been used to successfully evoke naturalistic sensations. However, the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the evoked sensations remain unknown. To understand how specific stimulation parameters elicit certain sensations we must first understand the representation of those sensations in the brain. In this study we record from intracortical microelectrode arrays implanted in S1, premotor cortex, and posterior parietal cortex of a male human participant performing a somatosensory imagery task. The sensations imagined were those previously elicited by ICMS of S1, in the same array of the same participant. In both spike and local field potential recordings, features of the neural signal can be used to classify different imagined sensations. These features are shown to be stable over time. The sensorimotor cortices only encode the imagined sensation during the imagery task, while posterior parietal cortex encodes the sensations starting with cue presentation. These findings demonstrate that different aspects of the sensory experience can be individually decoded from intracortically recorded human neural signals across the cortical sensory network. Activity underlying these unique sensory representations may inform the stimulation parameters for precisely eliciting specific sensations via ICMS in future work. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Electrical stimulation of human cortex is increasingly more common for providing feedback in neural devices. Understanding the relationship between naturally evoked and artificially evoked neurophysiology for the same sensations will be important in advancing such devices. Here, we investigate the neural activity in human primary somatosensory, premotor, and parietal cortices during somatosensory imagery. The sensations imagined were those previously elicited during intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) of the same somatosensory electrode array. We elucidate the neural features during somatosensory imagery that significantly encode different aspects of individual sensations and demonstrate feature stability over almost a year. The correspondence between neurophysiology elicited with or without stimulation for the same sensations will inform methods to deliver more precise feedback through stimulation in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8018772
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Society for Neuroscience
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80187722021-04-05 The Neurophysiological Representation of Imagined Somatosensory Percepts in Human Cortex Bashford, Luke Rosenthal, Isabelle Kellis, Spencer Pejsa, Kelsie Kramer, Daniel Lee, Brian Liu, Charles Andersen, Richard A. J Neurosci Research Articles Intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) in human primary somatosensory cortex (S1) has been used to successfully evoke naturalistic sensations. However, the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the evoked sensations remain unknown. To understand how specific stimulation parameters elicit certain sensations we must first understand the representation of those sensations in the brain. In this study we record from intracortical microelectrode arrays implanted in S1, premotor cortex, and posterior parietal cortex of a male human participant performing a somatosensory imagery task. The sensations imagined were those previously elicited by ICMS of S1, in the same array of the same participant. In both spike and local field potential recordings, features of the neural signal can be used to classify different imagined sensations. These features are shown to be stable over time. The sensorimotor cortices only encode the imagined sensation during the imagery task, while posterior parietal cortex encodes the sensations starting with cue presentation. These findings demonstrate that different aspects of the sensory experience can be individually decoded from intracortically recorded human neural signals across the cortical sensory network. Activity underlying these unique sensory representations may inform the stimulation parameters for precisely eliciting specific sensations via ICMS in future work. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Electrical stimulation of human cortex is increasingly more common for providing feedback in neural devices. Understanding the relationship between naturally evoked and artificially evoked neurophysiology for the same sensations will be important in advancing such devices. Here, we investigate the neural activity in human primary somatosensory, premotor, and parietal cortices during somatosensory imagery. The sensations imagined were those previously elicited during intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) of the same somatosensory electrode array. We elucidate the neural features during somatosensory imagery that significantly encode different aspects of individual sensations and demonstrate feature stability over almost a year. The correspondence between neurophysiology elicited with or without stimulation for the same sensations will inform methods to deliver more precise feedback through stimulation in the future. Society for Neuroscience 2021-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8018772/ /pubmed/33483431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2460-20.2021 Text en Copyright © 2021 Bashford et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Bashford, Luke
Rosenthal, Isabelle
Kellis, Spencer
Pejsa, Kelsie
Kramer, Daniel
Lee, Brian
Liu, Charles
Andersen, Richard A.
The Neurophysiological Representation of Imagined Somatosensory Percepts in Human Cortex
title The Neurophysiological Representation of Imagined Somatosensory Percepts in Human Cortex
title_full The Neurophysiological Representation of Imagined Somatosensory Percepts in Human Cortex
title_fullStr The Neurophysiological Representation of Imagined Somatosensory Percepts in Human Cortex
title_full_unstemmed The Neurophysiological Representation of Imagined Somatosensory Percepts in Human Cortex
title_short The Neurophysiological Representation of Imagined Somatosensory Percepts in Human Cortex
title_sort neurophysiological representation of imagined somatosensory percepts in human cortex
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8018772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33483431
http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2460-20.2021
work_keys_str_mv AT bashfordluke theneurophysiologicalrepresentationofimaginedsomatosensoryperceptsinhumancortex
AT rosenthalisabelle theneurophysiologicalrepresentationofimaginedsomatosensoryperceptsinhumancortex
AT kellisspencer theneurophysiologicalrepresentationofimaginedsomatosensoryperceptsinhumancortex
AT pejsakelsie theneurophysiologicalrepresentationofimaginedsomatosensoryperceptsinhumancortex
AT kramerdaniel theneurophysiologicalrepresentationofimaginedsomatosensoryperceptsinhumancortex
AT leebrian theneurophysiologicalrepresentationofimaginedsomatosensoryperceptsinhumancortex
AT liucharles theneurophysiologicalrepresentationofimaginedsomatosensoryperceptsinhumancortex
AT andersenricharda theneurophysiologicalrepresentationofimaginedsomatosensoryperceptsinhumancortex
AT bashfordluke neurophysiologicalrepresentationofimaginedsomatosensoryperceptsinhumancortex
AT rosenthalisabelle neurophysiologicalrepresentationofimaginedsomatosensoryperceptsinhumancortex
AT kellisspencer neurophysiologicalrepresentationofimaginedsomatosensoryperceptsinhumancortex
AT pejsakelsie neurophysiologicalrepresentationofimaginedsomatosensoryperceptsinhumancortex
AT kramerdaniel neurophysiologicalrepresentationofimaginedsomatosensoryperceptsinhumancortex
AT leebrian neurophysiologicalrepresentationofimaginedsomatosensoryperceptsinhumancortex
AT liucharles neurophysiologicalrepresentationofimaginedsomatosensoryperceptsinhumancortex
AT andersenricharda neurophysiologicalrepresentationofimaginedsomatosensoryperceptsinhumancortex