Cargando…
The Neurophysiological Representation of Imagined Somatosensory Percepts in Human Cortex
Intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) in human primary somatosensory cortex (S1) has been used to successfully evoke naturalistic sensations. However, the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the evoked sensations remain unknown. To understand how specific stimulation parameters elicit certain s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Society for Neuroscience
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8018772/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33483431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2460-20.2021 |
_version_ | 1783674251540168704 |
---|---|
author | Bashford, Luke Rosenthal, Isabelle Kellis, Spencer Pejsa, Kelsie Kramer, Daniel Lee, Brian Liu, Charles Andersen, Richard A. |
author_facet | Bashford, Luke Rosenthal, Isabelle Kellis, Spencer Pejsa, Kelsie Kramer, Daniel Lee, Brian Liu, Charles Andersen, Richard A. |
author_sort | Bashford, Luke |
collection | PubMed |
description | Intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) in human primary somatosensory cortex (S1) has been used to successfully evoke naturalistic sensations. However, the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the evoked sensations remain unknown. To understand how specific stimulation parameters elicit certain sensations we must first understand the representation of those sensations in the brain. In this study we record from intracortical microelectrode arrays implanted in S1, premotor cortex, and posterior parietal cortex of a male human participant performing a somatosensory imagery task. The sensations imagined were those previously elicited by ICMS of S1, in the same array of the same participant. In both spike and local field potential recordings, features of the neural signal can be used to classify different imagined sensations. These features are shown to be stable over time. The sensorimotor cortices only encode the imagined sensation during the imagery task, while posterior parietal cortex encodes the sensations starting with cue presentation. These findings demonstrate that different aspects of the sensory experience can be individually decoded from intracortically recorded human neural signals across the cortical sensory network. Activity underlying these unique sensory representations may inform the stimulation parameters for precisely eliciting specific sensations via ICMS in future work. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Electrical stimulation of human cortex is increasingly more common for providing feedback in neural devices. Understanding the relationship between naturally evoked and artificially evoked neurophysiology for the same sensations will be important in advancing such devices. Here, we investigate the neural activity in human primary somatosensory, premotor, and parietal cortices during somatosensory imagery. The sensations imagined were those previously elicited during intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) of the same somatosensory electrode array. We elucidate the neural features during somatosensory imagery that significantly encode different aspects of individual sensations and demonstrate feature stability over almost a year. The correspondence between neurophysiology elicited with or without stimulation for the same sensations will inform methods to deliver more precise feedback through stimulation in the future. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8018772 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Society for Neuroscience |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80187722021-04-05 The Neurophysiological Representation of Imagined Somatosensory Percepts in Human Cortex Bashford, Luke Rosenthal, Isabelle Kellis, Spencer Pejsa, Kelsie Kramer, Daniel Lee, Brian Liu, Charles Andersen, Richard A. J Neurosci Research Articles Intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) in human primary somatosensory cortex (S1) has been used to successfully evoke naturalistic sensations. However, the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the evoked sensations remain unknown. To understand how specific stimulation parameters elicit certain sensations we must first understand the representation of those sensations in the brain. In this study we record from intracortical microelectrode arrays implanted in S1, premotor cortex, and posterior parietal cortex of a male human participant performing a somatosensory imagery task. The sensations imagined were those previously elicited by ICMS of S1, in the same array of the same participant. In both spike and local field potential recordings, features of the neural signal can be used to classify different imagined sensations. These features are shown to be stable over time. The sensorimotor cortices only encode the imagined sensation during the imagery task, while posterior parietal cortex encodes the sensations starting with cue presentation. These findings demonstrate that different aspects of the sensory experience can be individually decoded from intracortically recorded human neural signals across the cortical sensory network. Activity underlying these unique sensory representations may inform the stimulation parameters for precisely eliciting specific sensations via ICMS in future work. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Electrical stimulation of human cortex is increasingly more common for providing feedback in neural devices. Understanding the relationship between naturally evoked and artificially evoked neurophysiology for the same sensations will be important in advancing such devices. Here, we investigate the neural activity in human primary somatosensory, premotor, and parietal cortices during somatosensory imagery. The sensations imagined were those previously elicited during intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) of the same somatosensory electrode array. We elucidate the neural features during somatosensory imagery that significantly encode different aspects of individual sensations and demonstrate feature stability over almost a year. The correspondence between neurophysiology elicited with or without stimulation for the same sensations will inform methods to deliver more precise feedback through stimulation in the future. Society for Neuroscience 2021-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8018772/ /pubmed/33483431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2460-20.2021 Text en Copyright © 2021 Bashford et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Bashford, Luke Rosenthal, Isabelle Kellis, Spencer Pejsa, Kelsie Kramer, Daniel Lee, Brian Liu, Charles Andersen, Richard A. The Neurophysiological Representation of Imagined Somatosensory Percepts in Human Cortex |
title | The Neurophysiological Representation of Imagined Somatosensory Percepts in Human Cortex |
title_full | The Neurophysiological Representation of Imagined Somatosensory Percepts in Human Cortex |
title_fullStr | The Neurophysiological Representation of Imagined Somatosensory Percepts in Human Cortex |
title_full_unstemmed | The Neurophysiological Representation of Imagined Somatosensory Percepts in Human Cortex |
title_short | The Neurophysiological Representation of Imagined Somatosensory Percepts in Human Cortex |
title_sort | neurophysiological representation of imagined somatosensory percepts in human cortex |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8018772/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33483431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2460-20.2021 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bashfordluke theneurophysiologicalrepresentationofimaginedsomatosensoryperceptsinhumancortex AT rosenthalisabelle theneurophysiologicalrepresentationofimaginedsomatosensoryperceptsinhumancortex AT kellisspencer theneurophysiologicalrepresentationofimaginedsomatosensoryperceptsinhumancortex AT pejsakelsie theneurophysiologicalrepresentationofimaginedsomatosensoryperceptsinhumancortex AT kramerdaniel theneurophysiologicalrepresentationofimaginedsomatosensoryperceptsinhumancortex AT leebrian theneurophysiologicalrepresentationofimaginedsomatosensoryperceptsinhumancortex AT liucharles theneurophysiologicalrepresentationofimaginedsomatosensoryperceptsinhumancortex AT andersenricharda theneurophysiologicalrepresentationofimaginedsomatosensoryperceptsinhumancortex AT bashfordluke neurophysiologicalrepresentationofimaginedsomatosensoryperceptsinhumancortex AT rosenthalisabelle neurophysiologicalrepresentationofimaginedsomatosensoryperceptsinhumancortex AT kellisspencer neurophysiologicalrepresentationofimaginedsomatosensoryperceptsinhumancortex AT pejsakelsie neurophysiologicalrepresentationofimaginedsomatosensoryperceptsinhumancortex AT kramerdaniel neurophysiologicalrepresentationofimaginedsomatosensoryperceptsinhumancortex AT leebrian neurophysiologicalrepresentationofimaginedsomatosensoryperceptsinhumancortex AT liucharles neurophysiologicalrepresentationofimaginedsomatosensoryperceptsinhumancortex AT andersenricharda neurophysiologicalrepresentationofimaginedsomatosensoryperceptsinhumancortex |