Cargando…

3D genital shape complexity in female marine mammals

Comparisons of 3D shapes have recently been applied to diverse anatomical structures using landmarking techniques. However, discerning evolutionary patterns can be challenging for structures lacking homologous landmarks. We used alpha shape analyses to quantify vaginal shape complexity in 40 marine...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Orbach, Dara N., Brassey, Charlotte A., Gardiner, James D., Brennan, Patricia L. R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8019040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33841778
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7269
_version_ 1783674300524396544
author Orbach, Dara N.
Brassey, Charlotte A.
Gardiner, James D.
Brennan, Patricia L. R.
author_facet Orbach, Dara N.
Brassey, Charlotte A.
Gardiner, James D.
Brennan, Patricia L. R.
author_sort Orbach, Dara N.
collection PubMed
description Comparisons of 3D shapes have recently been applied to diverse anatomical structures using landmarking techniques. However, discerning evolutionary patterns can be challenging for structures lacking homologous landmarks. We used alpha shape analyses to quantify vaginal shape complexity in 40 marine mammal specimens including cetaceans, pinnipeds, and sirenians. We explored phylogenetic signal and the potential roles of natural and sexual selection on vaginal shape evolution. Complexity scores were consistent with qualitative observations. Cetaceans had a broad range of alpha complexities, while pinnipeds were comparatively simple and sirenians were complex. Intraspecific variation was found. Three‐dimensional surface heat maps revealed that shape complexity was driven by invaginations and protrusions of the vaginal wall. Phylogenetic signal was weak and metrics of natural selection (relative neonate size) and sexual selection (relative testes size, sexual size dimorphism, and penis morphology) did not explain vaginal complexity patterns. Additional metrics, such as penile shape complexity, may yield interesting insights into marine mammal genital coevolution. We advocate for the use of alpha shapes to discern patterns of evolution that would otherwise not be possible in 3D anatomical structures lacking homologous landmarks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8019040
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80190402021-04-08 3D genital shape complexity in female marine mammals Orbach, Dara N. Brassey, Charlotte A. Gardiner, James D. Brennan, Patricia L. R. Ecol Evol Original Research Comparisons of 3D shapes have recently been applied to diverse anatomical structures using landmarking techniques. However, discerning evolutionary patterns can be challenging for structures lacking homologous landmarks. We used alpha shape analyses to quantify vaginal shape complexity in 40 marine mammal specimens including cetaceans, pinnipeds, and sirenians. We explored phylogenetic signal and the potential roles of natural and sexual selection on vaginal shape evolution. Complexity scores were consistent with qualitative observations. Cetaceans had a broad range of alpha complexities, while pinnipeds were comparatively simple and sirenians were complex. Intraspecific variation was found. Three‐dimensional surface heat maps revealed that shape complexity was driven by invaginations and protrusions of the vaginal wall. Phylogenetic signal was weak and metrics of natural selection (relative neonate size) and sexual selection (relative testes size, sexual size dimorphism, and penis morphology) did not explain vaginal complexity patterns. Additional metrics, such as penile shape complexity, may yield interesting insights into marine mammal genital coevolution. We advocate for the use of alpha shapes to discern patterns of evolution that would otherwise not be possible in 3D anatomical structures lacking homologous landmarks. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8019040/ /pubmed/33841778 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7269 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Orbach, Dara N.
Brassey, Charlotte A.
Gardiner, James D.
Brennan, Patricia L. R.
3D genital shape complexity in female marine mammals
title 3D genital shape complexity in female marine mammals
title_full 3D genital shape complexity in female marine mammals
title_fullStr 3D genital shape complexity in female marine mammals
title_full_unstemmed 3D genital shape complexity in female marine mammals
title_short 3D genital shape complexity in female marine mammals
title_sort 3d genital shape complexity in female marine mammals
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8019040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33841778
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7269
work_keys_str_mv AT orbachdaran 3dgenitalshapecomplexityinfemalemarinemammals
AT brasseycharlottea 3dgenitalshapecomplexityinfemalemarinemammals
AT gardinerjamesd 3dgenitalshapecomplexityinfemalemarinemammals
AT brennanpatricialr 3dgenitalshapecomplexityinfemalemarinemammals