Cargando…

Are we ready to deal with a global COVID-19 pandemic? Rethinking countries’ capacity based on the Global Health Security Index

BACKGROUND: The Global Health Security (GHS) Index has been developed to measure a country’s capacity to cope with a public health emergency; however, evidence for whether it corresponds to the response to a global pandemic is lacking. This study performed a multidimensional association analysis to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ji, Ye, Shao, Jun, Tao, Bilin, Song, Huan, Li, Zhongqi, Wang, Jianming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8019240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33823282
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.03.089
_version_ 1783674338554150912
author Ji, Ye
Shao, Jun
Tao, Bilin
Song, Huan
Li, Zhongqi
Wang, Jianming
author_facet Ji, Ye
Shao, Jun
Tao, Bilin
Song, Huan
Li, Zhongqi
Wang, Jianming
author_sort Ji, Ye
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Global Health Security (GHS) Index has been developed to measure a country’s capacity to cope with a public health emergency; however, evidence for whether it corresponds to the response to a global pandemic is lacking. This study performed a multidimensional association analysis to explore the correlation between the GHS Index and COVID-19-associated morbidity, mortality, and disease increase rate (DIR) in 178 countries (regions). METHODS: The GHS Index and COVID-19 pandemic data – including total cases per million (TCPM), total deaths per million (TDPM), and daily growth rate – were extracted from online databases. The Spearman correlation coefficient was applied to describe the strength of the association between the GHS Index, sociological characteristics, and the epidemic situation of COVID-19. DIRs were compared, and the impact of the GHS Index on the DIR by the time of “lockdown” was visualized. RESULTS: The overall GHS Index was positively correlated with TCPM and TDPM, with coefficients of 0.34 and 0.41, respectively. Countries categorized into different GHS Indextiers had different DIRs before implementing lockdown measures. However, no significant difference was observed between countries in the middle and upper tiers after implementing lockdown measures. The correlation between GHS Index and DIR was positive five days before lockdown measures were taken, but it became negative 13 days later. CONCLUSIONS: The GHS Index has limited value in assessing a country's capacity to respond to a global pandemic. Nevertheless, it has potential value in determining the country’s ability to cope with a local epidemic situation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8019240
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80192402021-04-06 Are we ready to deal with a global COVID-19 pandemic? Rethinking countries’ capacity based on the Global Health Security Index Ji, Ye Shao, Jun Tao, Bilin Song, Huan Li, Zhongqi Wang, Jianming Int J Infect Dis Article BACKGROUND: The Global Health Security (GHS) Index has been developed to measure a country’s capacity to cope with a public health emergency; however, evidence for whether it corresponds to the response to a global pandemic is lacking. This study performed a multidimensional association analysis to explore the correlation between the GHS Index and COVID-19-associated morbidity, mortality, and disease increase rate (DIR) in 178 countries (regions). METHODS: The GHS Index and COVID-19 pandemic data – including total cases per million (TCPM), total deaths per million (TDPM), and daily growth rate – were extracted from online databases. The Spearman correlation coefficient was applied to describe the strength of the association between the GHS Index, sociological characteristics, and the epidemic situation of COVID-19. DIRs were compared, and the impact of the GHS Index on the DIR by the time of “lockdown” was visualized. RESULTS: The overall GHS Index was positively correlated with TCPM and TDPM, with coefficients of 0.34 and 0.41, respectively. Countries categorized into different GHS Indextiers had different DIRs before implementing lockdown measures. However, no significant difference was observed between countries in the middle and upper tiers after implementing lockdown measures. The correlation between GHS Index and DIR was positive five days before lockdown measures were taken, but it became negative 13 days later. CONCLUSIONS: The GHS Index has limited value in assessing a country's capacity to respond to a global pandemic. Nevertheless, it has potential value in determining the country’s ability to cope with a local epidemic situation. The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases. 2021-05 2021-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8019240/ /pubmed/33823282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.03.089 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Ji, Ye
Shao, Jun
Tao, Bilin
Song, Huan
Li, Zhongqi
Wang, Jianming
Are we ready to deal with a global COVID-19 pandemic? Rethinking countries’ capacity based on the Global Health Security Index
title Are we ready to deal with a global COVID-19 pandemic? Rethinking countries’ capacity based on the Global Health Security Index
title_full Are we ready to deal with a global COVID-19 pandemic? Rethinking countries’ capacity based on the Global Health Security Index
title_fullStr Are we ready to deal with a global COVID-19 pandemic? Rethinking countries’ capacity based on the Global Health Security Index
title_full_unstemmed Are we ready to deal with a global COVID-19 pandemic? Rethinking countries’ capacity based on the Global Health Security Index
title_short Are we ready to deal with a global COVID-19 pandemic? Rethinking countries’ capacity based on the Global Health Security Index
title_sort are we ready to deal with a global covid-19 pandemic? rethinking countries’ capacity based on the global health security index
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8019240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33823282
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.03.089
work_keys_str_mv AT jiye arewereadytodealwithaglobalcovid19pandemicrethinkingcountriescapacitybasedontheglobalhealthsecurityindex
AT shaojun arewereadytodealwithaglobalcovid19pandemicrethinkingcountriescapacitybasedontheglobalhealthsecurityindex
AT taobilin arewereadytodealwithaglobalcovid19pandemicrethinkingcountriescapacitybasedontheglobalhealthsecurityindex
AT songhuan arewereadytodealwithaglobalcovid19pandemicrethinkingcountriescapacitybasedontheglobalhealthsecurityindex
AT lizhongqi arewereadytodealwithaglobalcovid19pandemicrethinkingcountriescapacitybasedontheglobalhealthsecurityindex
AT wangjianming arewereadytodealwithaglobalcovid19pandemicrethinkingcountriescapacitybasedontheglobalhealthsecurityindex