Cargando…

Implications of Continuous Noninvasive Finger Cuff Arterial Pressure Device Use during Cesarean Delivery for Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy Preload Optimization: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: Although fixed-volume conventional fluid preloading protocol fails to attenuate postspinal hypotension during cesarean delivery, the effect of goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) remains less explored. Continuous noninvasive finger cuff arterial pressure monitoring using devices such as t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Shan-Han, Lin, Yi-Shiuan, Lee, Chien-Nan, Cheng, Ya-Jung, Chen, Ying-Hsi, Chiu, Hsin-Chan, Wu, Chun-Yu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8019625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33855080
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6685584
_version_ 1783674411839127552
author Yang, Shan-Han
Lin, Yi-Shiuan
Lee, Chien-Nan
Cheng, Ya-Jung
Chen, Ying-Hsi
Chiu, Hsin-Chan
Wu, Chun-Yu
author_facet Yang, Shan-Han
Lin, Yi-Shiuan
Lee, Chien-Nan
Cheng, Ya-Jung
Chen, Ying-Hsi
Chiu, Hsin-Chan
Wu, Chun-Yu
author_sort Yang, Shan-Han
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although fixed-volume conventional fluid preloading protocol fails to attenuate postspinal hypotension during cesarean delivery, the effect of goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) remains less explored. Continuous noninvasive finger cuff arterial pressure monitoring using devices such as the ClearSight System can provide the noninvasive stroke volume value, enabling clinicians to perform GDFT before spinal anesthesia; however, the efficacy of GDFT requires further elucidation. METHOD: In total, 71 consecutive full-term pregnant women were randomly divided into a control group (n = 34) and a GDFT group (n = 37). Before spinal anesthesia, the control group received a fixed dose (1000 mL) of crystalloid fluid, but the GDFT group received repeated 3 mL/kg body weight of crystalloid fluid challenges within 3 minutes with a 1-minute interval between each fluid challenge based on the stroke volume incremental changes obtained using the ClearSight System (targeting a stroke volume increase of ≥5% after a fluid challenge). The primary outcome was the incidence of postspinal hypotension. The secondary outcomes were total fluid volume, vasopressor dosage, hemodynamic parameter changes, maternal adverse effects, and neonatal profiles. RESULT: Women in the GDFT group received more fluid than did those in the control group (1132 ± 108 vs. 1247 ± 202 mL; p = 0.0044), but the incidence of postspinal hypotension (79.4% vs. 73.0%,; p = 0.5864) and norepinephrine dose (12.5 ± 10.6 vs. 15.1 ± 12.8 mcg, respectively; p = 0.3512) was comparable between the two groups. Fewer women in the GDFT group experienced nausea (61.76% vs. 35.14%; p = 0.0332). Neonatal outcomes (Apgar score and umbilical blood analysis) were comparable and typical in both groups. CONCLUSION: ClearSight-guided GDFT did not ameliorate postspinal hypotension but may reduce nausea. This trial is registered with NCT03013140.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8019625
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80196252021-04-13 Implications of Continuous Noninvasive Finger Cuff Arterial Pressure Device Use during Cesarean Delivery for Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy Preload Optimization: A Randomized Controlled Trial Yang, Shan-Han Lin, Yi-Shiuan Lee, Chien-Nan Cheng, Ya-Jung Chen, Ying-Hsi Chiu, Hsin-Chan Wu, Chun-Yu Biomed Res Int Research Article BACKGROUND: Although fixed-volume conventional fluid preloading protocol fails to attenuate postspinal hypotension during cesarean delivery, the effect of goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) remains less explored. Continuous noninvasive finger cuff arterial pressure monitoring using devices such as the ClearSight System can provide the noninvasive stroke volume value, enabling clinicians to perform GDFT before spinal anesthesia; however, the efficacy of GDFT requires further elucidation. METHOD: In total, 71 consecutive full-term pregnant women were randomly divided into a control group (n = 34) and a GDFT group (n = 37). Before spinal anesthesia, the control group received a fixed dose (1000 mL) of crystalloid fluid, but the GDFT group received repeated 3 mL/kg body weight of crystalloid fluid challenges within 3 minutes with a 1-minute interval between each fluid challenge based on the stroke volume incremental changes obtained using the ClearSight System (targeting a stroke volume increase of ≥5% after a fluid challenge). The primary outcome was the incidence of postspinal hypotension. The secondary outcomes were total fluid volume, vasopressor dosage, hemodynamic parameter changes, maternal adverse effects, and neonatal profiles. RESULT: Women in the GDFT group received more fluid than did those in the control group (1132 ± 108 vs. 1247 ± 202 mL; p = 0.0044), but the incidence of postspinal hypotension (79.4% vs. 73.0%,; p = 0.5864) and norepinephrine dose (12.5 ± 10.6 vs. 15.1 ± 12.8 mcg, respectively; p = 0.3512) was comparable between the two groups. Fewer women in the GDFT group experienced nausea (61.76% vs. 35.14%; p = 0.0332). Neonatal outcomes (Apgar score and umbilical blood analysis) were comparable and typical in both groups. CONCLUSION: ClearSight-guided GDFT did not ameliorate postspinal hypotension but may reduce nausea. This trial is registered with NCT03013140. Hindawi 2021-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8019625/ /pubmed/33855080 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6685584 Text en Copyright © 2021 Shan-Han Yang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yang, Shan-Han
Lin, Yi-Shiuan
Lee, Chien-Nan
Cheng, Ya-Jung
Chen, Ying-Hsi
Chiu, Hsin-Chan
Wu, Chun-Yu
Implications of Continuous Noninvasive Finger Cuff Arterial Pressure Device Use during Cesarean Delivery for Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy Preload Optimization: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title Implications of Continuous Noninvasive Finger Cuff Arterial Pressure Device Use during Cesarean Delivery for Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy Preload Optimization: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Implications of Continuous Noninvasive Finger Cuff Arterial Pressure Device Use during Cesarean Delivery for Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy Preload Optimization: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Implications of Continuous Noninvasive Finger Cuff Arterial Pressure Device Use during Cesarean Delivery for Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy Preload Optimization: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Implications of Continuous Noninvasive Finger Cuff Arterial Pressure Device Use during Cesarean Delivery for Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy Preload Optimization: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Implications of Continuous Noninvasive Finger Cuff Arterial Pressure Device Use during Cesarean Delivery for Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy Preload Optimization: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort implications of continuous noninvasive finger cuff arterial pressure device use during cesarean delivery for goal-directed fluid therapy preload optimization: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8019625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33855080
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6685584
work_keys_str_mv AT yangshanhan implicationsofcontinuousnoninvasivefingercuffarterialpressuredeviceuseduringcesareandeliveryforgoaldirectedfluidtherapypreloadoptimizationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT linyishiuan implicationsofcontinuousnoninvasivefingercuffarterialpressuredeviceuseduringcesareandeliveryforgoaldirectedfluidtherapypreloadoptimizationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT leechiennan implicationsofcontinuousnoninvasivefingercuffarterialpressuredeviceuseduringcesareandeliveryforgoaldirectedfluidtherapypreloadoptimizationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chengyajung implicationsofcontinuousnoninvasivefingercuffarterialpressuredeviceuseduringcesareandeliveryforgoaldirectedfluidtherapypreloadoptimizationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chenyinghsi implicationsofcontinuousnoninvasivefingercuffarterialpressuredeviceuseduringcesareandeliveryforgoaldirectedfluidtherapypreloadoptimizationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chiuhsinchan implicationsofcontinuousnoninvasivefingercuffarterialpressuredeviceuseduringcesareandeliveryforgoaldirectedfluidtherapypreloadoptimizationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wuchunyu implicationsofcontinuousnoninvasivefingercuffarterialpressuredeviceuseduringcesareandeliveryforgoaldirectedfluidtherapypreloadoptimizationarandomizedcontrolledtrial