Cargando…

The role of the iliotibial band cross-sectional area as a morphological parameter of the iliotibial band friction syndrome: a retrospective pilot study

BACKGROUND: Iliotibial band friction syndrome (ITBFS) is a common disorder of the lateral knee. Previous research has reported that the iliotibial band (ITB) thickness (ITBT) is correlated with ITBFS, and ITBT has been considered to be a key morphologic parameter of ITBFS. However, the thickness is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Jiyeon, Cho, Hyung Rae, Kang, Keum Nae, Choi, Kun Woong, Choi, Young Soon, Jeong, Hye-Won, Yi, Jungmin, Kim, Young Uk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Pain Society 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8019960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33785675
http://dx.doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2021.34.2.229
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Iliotibial band friction syndrome (ITBFS) is a common disorder of the lateral knee. Previous research has reported that the iliotibial band (ITB) thickness (ITBT) is correlated with ITBFS, and ITBT has been considered to be a key morphologic parameter of ITBFS. However, the thickness is different from inflammatory hypertrophy. Thus, we made the ITB cross-sectional area (ITBCSA) a new morphological parameter to assess ITBFS. METHODS: Forty-three patients with ITBFS group and from 43 normal group who underwent T1W magnetic resonance imaging were enrolled. The ITBCSA was measured as the cross-sectional area of the ITB that was most hypertrophied in the magnetic resonance axial images. The ITBT was measured as the thickest site of ITB. RESULTS: The mean ITBCSA was 25.24 ± 6.59 mm(2) in the normal group and 38.75 ± 9.11 mm(2) in the ITBFS group. The mean ITBT was 1.94 ± 0.41 mm in the normal group and 2.62 ± 0.46 mm in the ITBFS group. Patients in ITBFS group had significantly higher ITBCSA (P < 0.001) and ITBT (P < 0.001) than the normal group. A receiver operator characteristic curve analysis demonstrated that the best cut-off value of the ITBT was 2.29 mm, with 76.7% sensitivity, 79.1% specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) 0.88. The optimal cut-off score of the ITBCSA was 30.66 mm(2), with 79.1% sensitivity, 79.1% specificity, and AUC 0.87. CONCLUSIONS: ITBCSA is a new and sensitive morphological parameter for diagnosing ITBFS, and may even be more accurate than ITBT.