Cargando…

Comparison of tear proteomic and neuromediator profiles changes between small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK)

INTRODUCTION: The tear proteomics and neuromediators are associated with clinical dry eye parameters following refractive surgery. PURPOSE: To investigate and compare the tear proteomic and neuromediator profiles following small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) versus laser-assisted in-situ ker...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Yu-Chi, Yam, Gary Hin-Fai, Lin, Molly Tzu-Yu, Teo, Ericia, Koh, Siew-Kwan, Deng, Lu, Zhou, Lei, Tong, Louis, Mehta, Jodhbir S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8020296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33842006
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2020.11.001
_version_ 1783674554664615936
author Liu, Yu-Chi
Yam, Gary Hin-Fai
Lin, Molly Tzu-Yu
Teo, Ericia
Koh, Siew-Kwan
Deng, Lu
Zhou, Lei
Tong, Louis
Mehta, Jodhbir S.
author_facet Liu, Yu-Chi
Yam, Gary Hin-Fai
Lin, Molly Tzu-Yu
Teo, Ericia
Koh, Siew-Kwan
Deng, Lu
Zhou, Lei
Tong, Louis
Mehta, Jodhbir S.
author_sort Liu, Yu-Chi
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The tear proteomics and neuromediators are associated with clinical dry eye parameters following refractive surgery. PURPOSE: To investigate and compare the tear proteomic and neuromediator profiles following small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) versus laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK). METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial with paired-eye design, 70 patients were randomized to receive SMILE in one eye and LASIK in the other eye. Tear samples were collected preoperatively, and 1 week, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively, and were examined for protein concentration changes using sequential window acquisition of all theoretical fragment ion mass spectrometry (SWATH-MS). The data were analyzed with DAVID Bioinformatics Resources for enriched gene ontology terms and over-represented pathways. Tear neuromediators levels were correlated with clinical parameters. RESULTS: Post-SMILE eyes had significantly better Oxford staining scores and tear break-up time (TBUT) than post-LASIK eyes at 1 and 3 months, respectively. Tear substance P and nerve growth factor levels were significantly higher in the LASIK group for 3 months and 1 year, respectively. SMILE and LASIK shared some similar biological responses postoperatively, but there was significant up-regulation in leukocyte migration and wound healing at 1 week, humoral immune response and apoptosis at 1 month, negative regulation of endopeptidase activity at 3 to 6 months, and extracellular structure organization at 1 year in the post-LASIK eyes. Tear mucin-like protein 1 and substance P levels were significantly correlated with TBUT (r = -0.47, r = -0.49, respectively). CONCLUSION: Significant differences in the tear neuromediators and proteomics were observed between SMILE and LASIK, even though clinical dry eye signs have subsided and became comparable between 2 procedures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8020296
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80202962021-04-08 Comparison of tear proteomic and neuromediator profiles changes between small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) Liu, Yu-Chi Yam, Gary Hin-Fai Lin, Molly Tzu-Yu Teo, Ericia Koh, Siew-Kwan Deng, Lu Zhou, Lei Tong, Louis Mehta, Jodhbir S. J Adv Res Basic and Biological Science INTRODUCTION: The tear proteomics and neuromediators are associated with clinical dry eye parameters following refractive surgery. PURPOSE: To investigate and compare the tear proteomic and neuromediator profiles following small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) versus laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK). METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial with paired-eye design, 70 patients were randomized to receive SMILE in one eye and LASIK in the other eye. Tear samples were collected preoperatively, and 1 week, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively, and were examined for protein concentration changes using sequential window acquisition of all theoretical fragment ion mass spectrometry (SWATH-MS). The data were analyzed with DAVID Bioinformatics Resources for enriched gene ontology terms and over-represented pathways. Tear neuromediators levels were correlated with clinical parameters. RESULTS: Post-SMILE eyes had significantly better Oxford staining scores and tear break-up time (TBUT) than post-LASIK eyes at 1 and 3 months, respectively. Tear substance P and nerve growth factor levels were significantly higher in the LASIK group for 3 months and 1 year, respectively. SMILE and LASIK shared some similar biological responses postoperatively, but there was significant up-regulation in leukocyte migration and wound healing at 1 week, humoral immune response and apoptosis at 1 month, negative regulation of endopeptidase activity at 3 to 6 months, and extracellular structure organization at 1 year in the post-LASIK eyes. Tear mucin-like protein 1 and substance P levels were significantly correlated with TBUT (r = -0.47, r = -0.49, respectively). CONCLUSION: Significant differences in the tear neuromediators and proteomics were observed between SMILE and LASIK, even though clinical dry eye signs have subsided and became comparable between 2 procedures. Elsevier 2020-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8020296/ /pubmed/33842006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2020.11.001 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Cairo University. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Basic and Biological Science
Liu, Yu-Chi
Yam, Gary Hin-Fai
Lin, Molly Tzu-Yu
Teo, Ericia
Koh, Siew-Kwan
Deng, Lu
Zhou, Lei
Tong, Louis
Mehta, Jodhbir S.
Comparison of tear proteomic and neuromediator profiles changes between small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK)
title Comparison of tear proteomic and neuromediator profiles changes between small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK)
title_full Comparison of tear proteomic and neuromediator profiles changes between small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK)
title_fullStr Comparison of tear proteomic and neuromediator profiles changes between small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK)
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of tear proteomic and neuromediator profiles changes between small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK)
title_short Comparison of tear proteomic and neuromediator profiles changes between small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK)
title_sort comparison of tear proteomic and neuromediator profiles changes between small incision lenticule extraction (smile) and femtosecond laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (lasik)
topic Basic and Biological Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8020296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33842006
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2020.11.001
work_keys_str_mv AT liuyuchi comparisonoftearproteomicandneuromediatorprofileschangesbetweensmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmileandfemtosecondlaserassistedinsitukeratomileusislasik
AT yamgaryhinfai comparisonoftearproteomicandneuromediatorprofileschangesbetweensmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmileandfemtosecondlaserassistedinsitukeratomileusislasik
AT linmollytzuyu comparisonoftearproteomicandneuromediatorprofileschangesbetweensmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmileandfemtosecondlaserassistedinsitukeratomileusislasik
AT teoericia comparisonoftearproteomicandneuromediatorprofileschangesbetweensmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmileandfemtosecondlaserassistedinsitukeratomileusislasik
AT kohsiewkwan comparisonoftearproteomicandneuromediatorprofileschangesbetweensmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmileandfemtosecondlaserassistedinsitukeratomileusislasik
AT denglu comparisonoftearproteomicandneuromediatorprofileschangesbetweensmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmileandfemtosecondlaserassistedinsitukeratomileusislasik
AT zhoulei comparisonoftearproteomicandneuromediatorprofileschangesbetweensmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmileandfemtosecondlaserassistedinsitukeratomileusislasik
AT tonglouis comparisonoftearproteomicandneuromediatorprofileschangesbetweensmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmileandfemtosecondlaserassistedinsitukeratomileusislasik
AT mehtajodhbirs comparisonoftearproteomicandneuromediatorprofileschangesbetweensmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmileandfemtosecondlaserassistedinsitukeratomileusislasik