Cargando…
Comparison of tear proteomic and neuromediator profiles changes between small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK)
INTRODUCTION: The tear proteomics and neuromediators are associated with clinical dry eye parameters following refractive surgery. PURPOSE: To investigate and compare the tear proteomic and neuromediator profiles following small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) versus laser-assisted in-situ ker...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8020296/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33842006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2020.11.001 |
_version_ | 1783674554664615936 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Yu-Chi Yam, Gary Hin-Fai Lin, Molly Tzu-Yu Teo, Ericia Koh, Siew-Kwan Deng, Lu Zhou, Lei Tong, Louis Mehta, Jodhbir S. |
author_facet | Liu, Yu-Chi Yam, Gary Hin-Fai Lin, Molly Tzu-Yu Teo, Ericia Koh, Siew-Kwan Deng, Lu Zhou, Lei Tong, Louis Mehta, Jodhbir S. |
author_sort | Liu, Yu-Chi |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The tear proteomics and neuromediators are associated with clinical dry eye parameters following refractive surgery. PURPOSE: To investigate and compare the tear proteomic and neuromediator profiles following small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) versus laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK). METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial with paired-eye design, 70 patients were randomized to receive SMILE in one eye and LASIK in the other eye. Tear samples were collected preoperatively, and 1 week, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively, and were examined for protein concentration changes using sequential window acquisition of all theoretical fragment ion mass spectrometry (SWATH-MS). The data were analyzed with DAVID Bioinformatics Resources for enriched gene ontology terms and over-represented pathways. Tear neuromediators levels were correlated with clinical parameters. RESULTS: Post-SMILE eyes had significantly better Oxford staining scores and tear break-up time (TBUT) than post-LASIK eyes at 1 and 3 months, respectively. Tear substance P and nerve growth factor levels were significantly higher in the LASIK group for 3 months and 1 year, respectively. SMILE and LASIK shared some similar biological responses postoperatively, but there was significant up-regulation in leukocyte migration and wound healing at 1 week, humoral immune response and apoptosis at 1 month, negative regulation of endopeptidase activity at 3 to 6 months, and extracellular structure organization at 1 year in the post-LASIK eyes. Tear mucin-like protein 1 and substance P levels were significantly correlated with TBUT (r = -0.47, r = -0.49, respectively). CONCLUSION: Significant differences in the tear neuromediators and proteomics were observed between SMILE and LASIK, even though clinical dry eye signs have subsided and became comparable between 2 procedures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8020296 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80202962021-04-08 Comparison of tear proteomic and neuromediator profiles changes between small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) Liu, Yu-Chi Yam, Gary Hin-Fai Lin, Molly Tzu-Yu Teo, Ericia Koh, Siew-Kwan Deng, Lu Zhou, Lei Tong, Louis Mehta, Jodhbir S. J Adv Res Basic and Biological Science INTRODUCTION: The tear proteomics and neuromediators are associated with clinical dry eye parameters following refractive surgery. PURPOSE: To investigate and compare the tear proteomic and neuromediator profiles following small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) versus laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK). METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial with paired-eye design, 70 patients were randomized to receive SMILE in one eye and LASIK in the other eye. Tear samples were collected preoperatively, and 1 week, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively, and were examined for protein concentration changes using sequential window acquisition of all theoretical fragment ion mass spectrometry (SWATH-MS). The data were analyzed with DAVID Bioinformatics Resources for enriched gene ontology terms and over-represented pathways. Tear neuromediators levels were correlated with clinical parameters. RESULTS: Post-SMILE eyes had significantly better Oxford staining scores and tear break-up time (TBUT) than post-LASIK eyes at 1 and 3 months, respectively. Tear substance P and nerve growth factor levels were significantly higher in the LASIK group for 3 months and 1 year, respectively. SMILE and LASIK shared some similar biological responses postoperatively, but there was significant up-regulation in leukocyte migration and wound healing at 1 week, humoral immune response and apoptosis at 1 month, negative regulation of endopeptidase activity at 3 to 6 months, and extracellular structure organization at 1 year in the post-LASIK eyes. Tear mucin-like protein 1 and substance P levels were significantly correlated with TBUT (r = -0.47, r = -0.49, respectively). CONCLUSION: Significant differences in the tear neuromediators and proteomics were observed between SMILE and LASIK, even though clinical dry eye signs have subsided and became comparable between 2 procedures. Elsevier 2020-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8020296/ /pubmed/33842006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2020.11.001 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Cairo University. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Basic and Biological Science Liu, Yu-Chi Yam, Gary Hin-Fai Lin, Molly Tzu-Yu Teo, Ericia Koh, Siew-Kwan Deng, Lu Zhou, Lei Tong, Louis Mehta, Jodhbir S. Comparison of tear proteomic and neuromediator profiles changes between small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) |
title | Comparison of tear proteomic and neuromediator profiles changes between small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) |
title_full | Comparison of tear proteomic and neuromediator profiles changes between small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) |
title_fullStr | Comparison of tear proteomic and neuromediator profiles changes between small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of tear proteomic and neuromediator profiles changes between small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) |
title_short | Comparison of tear proteomic and neuromediator profiles changes between small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) |
title_sort | comparison of tear proteomic and neuromediator profiles changes between small incision lenticule extraction (smile) and femtosecond laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (lasik) |
topic | Basic and Biological Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8020296/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33842006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2020.11.001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuyuchi comparisonoftearproteomicandneuromediatorprofileschangesbetweensmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmileandfemtosecondlaserassistedinsitukeratomileusislasik AT yamgaryhinfai comparisonoftearproteomicandneuromediatorprofileschangesbetweensmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmileandfemtosecondlaserassistedinsitukeratomileusislasik AT linmollytzuyu comparisonoftearproteomicandneuromediatorprofileschangesbetweensmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmileandfemtosecondlaserassistedinsitukeratomileusislasik AT teoericia comparisonoftearproteomicandneuromediatorprofileschangesbetweensmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmileandfemtosecondlaserassistedinsitukeratomileusislasik AT kohsiewkwan comparisonoftearproteomicandneuromediatorprofileschangesbetweensmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmileandfemtosecondlaserassistedinsitukeratomileusislasik AT denglu comparisonoftearproteomicandneuromediatorprofileschangesbetweensmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmileandfemtosecondlaserassistedinsitukeratomileusislasik AT zhoulei comparisonoftearproteomicandneuromediatorprofileschangesbetweensmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmileandfemtosecondlaserassistedinsitukeratomileusislasik AT tonglouis comparisonoftearproteomicandneuromediatorprofileschangesbetweensmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmileandfemtosecondlaserassistedinsitukeratomileusislasik AT mehtajodhbirs comparisonoftearproteomicandneuromediatorprofileschangesbetweensmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmileandfemtosecondlaserassistedinsitukeratomileusislasik |