Cargando…

Can a monologue-style ECA more effectively motivate eHealth users in initial distress than textual guidance?

Stress is a prevalent issue amongst patients with chronic conditions. As eHealth interventions are gaining importance, it becomes more relevant to invoke the possibilities from the eHealth technology itself to provide motivational acts during experiences of stress as to enhance adherence to the inte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scholten, Mark R., Kelders, Saskia M., Van Gemert-Pijnen, Julia E.W.C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8020434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33842700
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06509
_version_ 1783674583341072384
author Scholten, Mark R.
Kelders, Saskia M.
Van Gemert-Pijnen, Julia E.W.C.
author_facet Scholten, Mark R.
Kelders, Saskia M.
Van Gemert-Pijnen, Julia E.W.C.
author_sort Scholten, Mark R.
collection PubMed
description Stress is a prevalent issue amongst patients with chronic conditions. As eHealth interventions are gaining importance, it becomes more relevant to invoke the possibilities from the eHealth technology itself to provide motivational acts during experiences of stress as to enhance adherence to the intervention. Embodied Conversational Agents (ECA's) also known as ‘robots on screen’ can potentially provide a remedy. Within our eHealth experiment we applied a between-subjects design and experimentally studied the difference in appraisal of motivation and guidance. We deployed a functionally modest, monologue-style ECA and compared them with textual guidance. This way, we filtered out the considerable positive impact of interactive features that go along with dialogue-style ECA's. The study was carried out amongst eHealth users of which half were deliberately put in a stressful pre-condition. The rationale was two-sided; first, we hypothesized that it would induce a need for motivational support. Second, it would provide a fair representation of eHealth users in real life. Furthermore, we investigated hypothesized positive effects from a gender match between participant and ECA. The results demonstrated preferential ECA effects compared to text but only in the no stress conditions. Although our set-up controlled for user distraction by putting the facilitating ECA in a pane separate from the eHealth environment, we suspect that the enduring visual presence of the ECA during task completion had still inhibited distressed users. Discussing this phenomenon, our stance is that the hypothesis that ECA support is always superior to textual guidance is open for re-evaluation. Text may sometimes serve users equally well because it lacks human-like aspects that in stressful circumstances can become confrontational. We discuss the potential of ECA's to motivate, but also elaborate on the caveats. Further implications for the ECA, intervention adherence, and eHealth study fields are discussed in relation to stress.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8020434
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80204342021-04-08 Can a monologue-style ECA more effectively motivate eHealth users in initial distress than textual guidance? Scholten, Mark R. Kelders, Saskia M. Van Gemert-Pijnen, Julia E.W.C. Heliyon Research Article Stress is a prevalent issue amongst patients with chronic conditions. As eHealth interventions are gaining importance, it becomes more relevant to invoke the possibilities from the eHealth technology itself to provide motivational acts during experiences of stress as to enhance adherence to the intervention. Embodied Conversational Agents (ECA's) also known as ‘robots on screen’ can potentially provide a remedy. Within our eHealth experiment we applied a between-subjects design and experimentally studied the difference in appraisal of motivation and guidance. We deployed a functionally modest, monologue-style ECA and compared them with textual guidance. This way, we filtered out the considerable positive impact of interactive features that go along with dialogue-style ECA's. The study was carried out amongst eHealth users of which half were deliberately put in a stressful pre-condition. The rationale was two-sided; first, we hypothesized that it would induce a need for motivational support. Second, it would provide a fair representation of eHealth users in real life. Furthermore, we investigated hypothesized positive effects from a gender match between participant and ECA. The results demonstrated preferential ECA effects compared to text but only in the no stress conditions. Although our set-up controlled for user distraction by putting the facilitating ECA in a pane separate from the eHealth environment, we suspect that the enduring visual presence of the ECA during task completion had still inhibited distressed users. Discussing this phenomenon, our stance is that the hypothesis that ECA support is always superior to textual guidance is open for re-evaluation. Text may sometimes serve users equally well because it lacks human-like aspects that in stressful circumstances can become confrontational. We discuss the potential of ECA's to motivate, but also elaborate on the caveats. Further implications for the ECA, intervention adherence, and eHealth study fields are discussed in relation to stress. Elsevier 2021-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8020434/ /pubmed/33842700 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06509 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Scholten, Mark R.
Kelders, Saskia M.
Van Gemert-Pijnen, Julia E.W.C.
Can a monologue-style ECA more effectively motivate eHealth users in initial distress than textual guidance?
title Can a monologue-style ECA more effectively motivate eHealth users in initial distress than textual guidance?
title_full Can a monologue-style ECA more effectively motivate eHealth users in initial distress than textual guidance?
title_fullStr Can a monologue-style ECA more effectively motivate eHealth users in initial distress than textual guidance?
title_full_unstemmed Can a monologue-style ECA more effectively motivate eHealth users in initial distress than textual guidance?
title_short Can a monologue-style ECA more effectively motivate eHealth users in initial distress than textual guidance?
title_sort can a monologue-style eca more effectively motivate ehealth users in initial distress than textual guidance?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8020434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33842700
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06509
work_keys_str_mv AT scholtenmarkr canamonologuestyleecamoreeffectivelymotivateehealthusersininitialdistressthantextualguidance
AT kelderssaskiam canamonologuestyleecamoreeffectivelymotivateehealthusersininitialdistressthantextualguidance
AT vangemertpijnenjuliaewc canamonologuestyleecamoreeffectivelymotivateehealthusersininitialdistressthantextualguidance