Cargando…

Effects of different thermal insulation methods on the nasopharyngeal temperature in patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: This study explored the comparison of the thermal insulation effect of incubator to infusion thermometer in laparoscopic hysterectomy. METHODS: We assigned 75 patients enrolled in the study randomly to three groups: Group A: Used warming blanket; group B: Used warming blanket and infusio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Guanyu, Zhu, Zefei, Zheng, Hongyu, He, Shifeng, Zhang, Wanyue, Sun, Zhentao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8020548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33820541
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01324-7
_version_ 1783674599650623488
author Yang, Guanyu
Zhu, Zefei
Zheng, Hongyu
He, Shifeng
Zhang, Wanyue
Sun, Zhentao
author_facet Yang, Guanyu
Zhu, Zefei
Zheng, Hongyu
He, Shifeng
Zhang, Wanyue
Sun, Zhentao
author_sort Yang, Guanyu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study explored the comparison of the thermal insulation effect of incubator to infusion thermometer in laparoscopic hysterectomy. METHODS: We assigned 75 patients enrolled in the study randomly to three groups: Group A: Used warming blanket; group B: Used warming blanket and infusion thermometer; group C: Used warming blanket and incubator. The nasopharyngeal temperature at different time points during the operation served as the primary outcome. RESULTS: The nasopharyngeal temperature of the infusion heating group was significantly higher than that of the incubator group 60 min from the beginning of surgery (T3): 36.10 ± 0.20 vs 35.81 ± 0.20 (P<0.001)90 min from the beginning of surgery (T4): 36.35 ± 0.20 vs 35.85 ± 0.17 (P<0.001). Besides, the nasopharyngeal temperature of the incubator group was significantly higher compared to that of the control group 60 min from the beginning of surgery (T3): 35.81 ± 0.20 vs 35.62 ± 0.18 (P<0.001); 90 min from the beginning of surgery (T4): 35.85 ± 0.17 vs 35.60 ± 0.17 (P<0.001). Regarding the wake-up time, that of the control group was significantly higher compared to the infusion heating group: 24 ± 4 vs 21 ± 4 (P = 0.004) and the incubator group: 24 ± 4 vs 22 ± 4 (P = 0.035). CONCLUSION: Warming blanket (38 °C) combined infusion thermometer (37 °C) provides better perioperative thermal insulation. Hospitals without an infusion thermometer can opt for an incubator as a substitute. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered with ChiCTR2000039162, 20 October 2020.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8020548
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80205482021-04-07 Effects of different thermal insulation methods on the nasopharyngeal temperature in patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial Yang, Guanyu Zhu, Zefei Zheng, Hongyu He, Shifeng Zhang, Wanyue Sun, Zhentao BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: This study explored the comparison of the thermal insulation effect of incubator to infusion thermometer in laparoscopic hysterectomy. METHODS: We assigned 75 patients enrolled in the study randomly to three groups: Group A: Used warming blanket; group B: Used warming blanket and infusion thermometer; group C: Used warming blanket and incubator. The nasopharyngeal temperature at different time points during the operation served as the primary outcome. RESULTS: The nasopharyngeal temperature of the infusion heating group was significantly higher than that of the incubator group 60 min from the beginning of surgery (T3): 36.10 ± 0.20 vs 35.81 ± 0.20 (P<0.001)90 min from the beginning of surgery (T4): 36.35 ± 0.20 vs 35.85 ± 0.17 (P<0.001). Besides, the nasopharyngeal temperature of the incubator group was significantly higher compared to that of the control group 60 min from the beginning of surgery (T3): 35.81 ± 0.20 vs 35.62 ± 0.18 (P<0.001); 90 min from the beginning of surgery (T4): 35.85 ± 0.17 vs 35.60 ± 0.17 (P<0.001). Regarding the wake-up time, that of the control group was significantly higher compared to the infusion heating group: 24 ± 4 vs 21 ± 4 (P = 0.004) and the incubator group: 24 ± 4 vs 22 ± 4 (P = 0.035). CONCLUSION: Warming blanket (38 °C) combined infusion thermometer (37 °C) provides better perioperative thermal insulation. Hospitals without an infusion thermometer can opt for an incubator as a substitute. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered with ChiCTR2000039162, 20 October 2020. BioMed Central 2021-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8020548/ /pubmed/33820541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01324-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yang, Guanyu
Zhu, Zefei
Zheng, Hongyu
He, Shifeng
Zhang, Wanyue
Sun, Zhentao
Effects of different thermal insulation methods on the nasopharyngeal temperature in patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial
title Effects of different thermal insulation methods on the nasopharyngeal temperature in patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial
title_full Effects of different thermal insulation methods on the nasopharyngeal temperature in patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Effects of different thermal insulation methods on the nasopharyngeal temperature in patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Effects of different thermal insulation methods on the nasopharyngeal temperature in patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial
title_short Effects of different thermal insulation methods on the nasopharyngeal temperature in patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial
title_sort effects of different thermal insulation methods on the nasopharyngeal temperature in patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8020548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33820541
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01324-7
work_keys_str_mv AT yangguanyu effectsofdifferentthermalinsulationmethodsonthenasopharyngealtemperatureinpatientsundergoinglaparoscopichysterectomyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zhuzefei effectsofdifferentthermalinsulationmethodsonthenasopharyngealtemperatureinpatientsundergoinglaparoscopichysterectomyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zhenghongyu effectsofdifferentthermalinsulationmethodsonthenasopharyngealtemperatureinpatientsundergoinglaparoscopichysterectomyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT heshifeng effectsofdifferentthermalinsulationmethodsonthenasopharyngealtemperatureinpatientsundergoinglaparoscopichysterectomyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zhangwanyue effectsofdifferentthermalinsulationmethodsonthenasopharyngealtemperatureinpatientsundergoinglaparoscopichysterectomyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sunzhentao effectsofdifferentthermalinsulationmethodsonthenasopharyngealtemperatureinpatientsundergoinglaparoscopichysterectomyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial