Cargando…

A bibliometric analysis of food safety governance research from 1999 to 2019

Although the number of food governance‐related studies increased rapidly in the recent decade, the current academic research still lacked systematic integration of food safety governance. To clarify the development trends of research therein, this study summarized research articles concerning food s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shen, Cong, Wei, Mingxia, Sheng, Yilong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8020926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33841848
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.2220
_version_ 1783674651948351488
author Shen, Cong
Wei, Mingxia
Sheng, Yilong
author_facet Shen, Cong
Wei, Mingxia
Sheng, Yilong
author_sort Shen, Cong
collection PubMed
description Although the number of food governance‐related studies increased rapidly in the recent decade, the current academic research still lacked systematic integration of food safety governance. To clarify the development trends of research therein, this study summarized research articles concerning food safety governance by the Web of Science Core Collection. An in‐depth bibliometric analysis was then conducted through CiteSpace to summarize the current characters and hot spots of food safety governance research, and predicted future research trends. Results showed that food safety governance was multidisciplinary, which included environmental science, food science, economics, and agriculture. The United States had the largest number of relevant articles, and Wageningen University was the most influential scientific research institution. Among all the journals in this field, Food Policy ranked the first in publication volume and co‐citation frequency. The development of food safety governance research was divided into three processes, namely the separate formulation of the standards for public and private sectors, the joint implementation of these standards, and co‐governance by multiple sectors. The most popular research hot spots in this field were food safety policy integration and public–private partnership of food safety governance. Lower‐ and middle‐income countries focused more on food supply and food system design, and regrettably not on food safety. Higher‐income countries cared more about food safety and food nutrition. Besides, researchers of higher‐income countries also concentrated on consumers' voices in participating in food safety governance. Food safety co‐governance, online food governance, the willingness to buy safe food, and food safety governance under pandemics were considered as future research directions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8020926
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80209262021-04-08 A bibliometric analysis of food safety governance research from 1999 to 2019 Shen, Cong Wei, Mingxia Sheng, Yilong Food Sci Nutr Original Research Although the number of food governance‐related studies increased rapidly in the recent decade, the current academic research still lacked systematic integration of food safety governance. To clarify the development trends of research therein, this study summarized research articles concerning food safety governance by the Web of Science Core Collection. An in‐depth bibliometric analysis was then conducted through CiteSpace to summarize the current characters and hot spots of food safety governance research, and predicted future research trends. Results showed that food safety governance was multidisciplinary, which included environmental science, food science, economics, and agriculture. The United States had the largest number of relevant articles, and Wageningen University was the most influential scientific research institution. Among all the journals in this field, Food Policy ranked the first in publication volume and co‐citation frequency. The development of food safety governance research was divided into three processes, namely the separate formulation of the standards for public and private sectors, the joint implementation of these standards, and co‐governance by multiple sectors. The most popular research hot spots in this field were food safety policy integration and public–private partnership of food safety governance. Lower‐ and middle‐income countries focused more on food supply and food system design, and regrettably not on food safety. Higher‐income countries cared more about food safety and food nutrition. Besides, researchers of higher‐income countries also concentrated on consumers' voices in participating in food safety governance. Food safety co‐governance, online food governance, the willingness to buy safe food, and food safety governance under pandemics were considered as future research directions. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8020926/ /pubmed/33841848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.2220 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Food Science & Nutrition published by Wiley Periodicals LLC This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Shen, Cong
Wei, Mingxia
Sheng, Yilong
A bibliometric analysis of food safety governance research from 1999 to 2019
title A bibliometric analysis of food safety governance research from 1999 to 2019
title_full A bibliometric analysis of food safety governance research from 1999 to 2019
title_fullStr A bibliometric analysis of food safety governance research from 1999 to 2019
title_full_unstemmed A bibliometric analysis of food safety governance research from 1999 to 2019
title_short A bibliometric analysis of food safety governance research from 1999 to 2019
title_sort bibliometric analysis of food safety governance research from 1999 to 2019
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8020926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33841848
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.2220
work_keys_str_mv AT shencong abibliometricanalysisoffoodsafetygovernanceresearchfrom1999to2019
AT weimingxia abibliometricanalysisoffoodsafetygovernanceresearchfrom1999to2019
AT shengyilong abibliometricanalysisoffoodsafetygovernanceresearchfrom1999to2019
AT shencong bibliometricanalysisoffoodsafetygovernanceresearchfrom1999to2019
AT weimingxia bibliometricanalysisoffoodsafetygovernanceresearchfrom1999to2019
AT shengyilong bibliometricanalysisoffoodsafetygovernanceresearchfrom1999to2019