Cargando…
[(18)F]FDG and [(18)F]FES positron emission tomography for disease monitoring and assessment of anti-hormonal treatment eligibility in granulosa cell tumors of the ovary
Purpose: Adult granulosa cell tumors (AGCTs) of the ovary represent a rare malignancy in which timing and choice of treatment is a clinical challenge. This study investigates the value of FDG-PET/CT and FES-PET/CT in monitoring recurrent AGCTs and assessing eligibility for anti-hormonal treatment. M...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Impact Journals LLC
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8021033/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33868587 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.27925 |
_version_ | 1783674671702474752 |
---|---|
author | Roze, Joline F. van Meurs, Hannah S. Monroe, Glen R. Veldhuis, Wouter B. van Lonkhuijzen, Luc R.C.W. Bennink, Roel J. Groeneweg, Jolijn W. Witteveen, Petronella O. Jonges, Geertruida N. Zweemer, Ronald P. Braat, Arthur J.A.T. |
author_facet | Roze, Joline F. van Meurs, Hannah S. Monroe, Glen R. Veldhuis, Wouter B. van Lonkhuijzen, Luc R.C.W. Bennink, Roel J. Groeneweg, Jolijn W. Witteveen, Petronella O. Jonges, Geertruida N. Zweemer, Ronald P. Braat, Arthur J.A.T. |
author_sort | Roze, Joline F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose: Adult granulosa cell tumors (AGCTs) of the ovary represent a rare malignancy in which timing and choice of treatment is a clinical challenge. This study investigates the value of FDG-PET/CT and FES-PET/CT in monitoring recurrent AGCTs and assessing eligibility for anti-hormonal treatment. Materials and Methods: We evaluated 22 PET/CTs from recurrent AGCT patients to determine tumor FDG (n = 16) and FES (n = 6) uptake by qualitative and quantitative analysis. We included all consecutive patients from two tertiary hospitals between 2003-2020. Expression of ERα and ERβ and mitoses per 2 mm(2) were determined by immunohistochemistry and compared to FES and FDG uptake, respectively. Results: Qualitative assessment showed low-to-moderate FDG uptake in most patients (14/16), and intense uptake in 2/16. One patient with intense tumor FDG uptake had a high mitotic rate (18 per 2 mm(2)) Two out of six patients showed FES uptake on PET/CT at qualitative analysis. Lesion-based quantitative assessment showed a mean SUV(max) of 2.4 (± 0.9) on FDG-PET/CT and mean SUV(max) of 1.7 (± 0.5) on FES-PET/CT. Within patients, expression of ERα and ERβ varied and did not seem to correspond with FES uptake. In one FES positive patient, tumor locations with FES uptake remained stable or decreased in size during anti-hormonal treatment, while all FES negative locations progressed. Conclusions: This study shows that in AGCTs, FDG uptake is limited and therefore FDG-PET/CT is not advised. FES-PET/CT may be useful to non-invasively capture the estrogen receptor expression of separate tumor lesions and thus assess the potential eligibility for hormone treatment in AGCT patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8021033 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Impact Journals LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80210332021-04-15 [(18)F]FDG and [(18)F]FES positron emission tomography for disease monitoring and assessment of anti-hormonal treatment eligibility in granulosa cell tumors of the ovary Roze, Joline F. van Meurs, Hannah S. Monroe, Glen R. Veldhuis, Wouter B. van Lonkhuijzen, Luc R.C.W. Bennink, Roel J. Groeneweg, Jolijn W. Witteveen, Petronella O. Jonges, Geertruida N. Zweemer, Ronald P. Braat, Arthur J.A.T. Oncotarget Research Paper Purpose: Adult granulosa cell tumors (AGCTs) of the ovary represent a rare malignancy in which timing and choice of treatment is a clinical challenge. This study investigates the value of FDG-PET/CT and FES-PET/CT in monitoring recurrent AGCTs and assessing eligibility for anti-hormonal treatment. Materials and Methods: We evaluated 22 PET/CTs from recurrent AGCT patients to determine tumor FDG (n = 16) and FES (n = 6) uptake by qualitative and quantitative analysis. We included all consecutive patients from two tertiary hospitals between 2003-2020. Expression of ERα and ERβ and mitoses per 2 mm(2) were determined by immunohistochemistry and compared to FES and FDG uptake, respectively. Results: Qualitative assessment showed low-to-moderate FDG uptake in most patients (14/16), and intense uptake in 2/16. One patient with intense tumor FDG uptake had a high mitotic rate (18 per 2 mm(2)) Two out of six patients showed FES uptake on PET/CT at qualitative analysis. Lesion-based quantitative assessment showed a mean SUV(max) of 2.4 (± 0.9) on FDG-PET/CT and mean SUV(max) of 1.7 (± 0.5) on FES-PET/CT. Within patients, expression of ERα and ERβ varied and did not seem to correspond with FES uptake. In one FES positive patient, tumor locations with FES uptake remained stable or decreased in size during anti-hormonal treatment, while all FES negative locations progressed. Conclusions: This study shows that in AGCTs, FDG uptake is limited and therefore FDG-PET/CT is not advised. FES-PET/CT may be useful to non-invasively capture the estrogen receptor expression of separate tumor lesions and thus assess the potential eligibility for hormone treatment in AGCT patients. Impact Journals LLC 2021-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8021033/ /pubmed/33868587 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.27925 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Roze et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Roze, Joline F. van Meurs, Hannah S. Monroe, Glen R. Veldhuis, Wouter B. van Lonkhuijzen, Luc R.C.W. Bennink, Roel J. Groeneweg, Jolijn W. Witteveen, Petronella O. Jonges, Geertruida N. Zweemer, Ronald P. Braat, Arthur J.A.T. [(18)F]FDG and [(18)F]FES positron emission tomography for disease monitoring and assessment of anti-hormonal treatment eligibility in granulosa cell tumors of the ovary |
title | [(18)F]FDG and [(18)F]FES positron emission tomography for disease monitoring and assessment of anti-hormonal treatment eligibility in granulosa cell tumors of the ovary |
title_full | [(18)F]FDG and [(18)F]FES positron emission tomography for disease monitoring and assessment of anti-hormonal treatment eligibility in granulosa cell tumors of the ovary |
title_fullStr | [(18)F]FDG and [(18)F]FES positron emission tomography for disease monitoring and assessment of anti-hormonal treatment eligibility in granulosa cell tumors of the ovary |
title_full_unstemmed | [(18)F]FDG and [(18)F]FES positron emission tomography for disease monitoring and assessment of anti-hormonal treatment eligibility in granulosa cell tumors of the ovary |
title_short | [(18)F]FDG and [(18)F]FES positron emission tomography for disease monitoring and assessment of anti-hormonal treatment eligibility in granulosa cell tumors of the ovary |
title_sort | [(18)f]fdg and [(18)f]fes positron emission tomography for disease monitoring and assessment of anti-hormonal treatment eligibility in granulosa cell tumors of the ovary |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8021033/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33868587 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.27925 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rozejolinef 18ffdgand18ffespositronemissiontomographyfordiseasemonitoringandassessmentofantihormonaltreatmenteligibilityingranulosacelltumorsoftheovary AT vanmeurshannahs 18ffdgand18ffespositronemissiontomographyfordiseasemonitoringandassessmentofantihormonaltreatmenteligibilityingranulosacelltumorsoftheovary AT monroeglenr 18ffdgand18ffespositronemissiontomographyfordiseasemonitoringandassessmentofantihormonaltreatmenteligibilityingranulosacelltumorsoftheovary AT veldhuiswouterb 18ffdgand18ffespositronemissiontomographyfordiseasemonitoringandassessmentofantihormonaltreatmenteligibilityingranulosacelltumorsoftheovary AT vanlonkhuijzenlucrcw 18ffdgand18ffespositronemissiontomographyfordiseasemonitoringandassessmentofantihormonaltreatmenteligibilityingranulosacelltumorsoftheovary AT benninkroelj 18ffdgand18ffespositronemissiontomographyfordiseasemonitoringandassessmentofantihormonaltreatmenteligibilityingranulosacelltumorsoftheovary AT groenewegjolijnw 18ffdgand18ffespositronemissiontomographyfordiseasemonitoringandassessmentofantihormonaltreatmenteligibilityingranulosacelltumorsoftheovary AT witteveenpetronellao 18ffdgand18ffespositronemissiontomographyfordiseasemonitoringandassessmentofantihormonaltreatmenteligibilityingranulosacelltumorsoftheovary AT jongesgeertruidan 18ffdgand18ffespositronemissiontomographyfordiseasemonitoringandassessmentofantihormonaltreatmenteligibilityingranulosacelltumorsoftheovary AT zweemerronaldp 18ffdgand18ffespositronemissiontomographyfordiseasemonitoringandassessmentofantihormonaltreatmenteligibilityingranulosacelltumorsoftheovary AT braatarthurjat 18ffdgand18ffespositronemissiontomographyfordiseasemonitoringandassessmentofantihormonaltreatmenteligibilityingranulosacelltumorsoftheovary |