Cargando…

[(18)F]FDG and [(18)F]FES positron emission tomography for disease monitoring and assessment of anti-hormonal treatment eligibility in granulosa cell tumors of the ovary

Purpose: Adult granulosa cell tumors (AGCTs) of the ovary represent a rare malignancy in which timing and choice of treatment is a clinical challenge. This study investigates the value of FDG-PET/CT and FES-PET/CT in monitoring recurrent AGCTs and assessing eligibility for anti-hormonal treatment. M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roze, Joline F., van Meurs, Hannah S., Monroe, Glen R., Veldhuis, Wouter B., van Lonkhuijzen, Luc R.C.W., Bennink, Roel J., Groeneweg, Jolijn W., Witteveen, Petronella O., Jonges, Geertruida N., Zweemer, Ronald P., Braat, Arthur J.A.T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8021033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33868587
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.27925
_version_ 1783674671702474752
author Roze, Joline F.
van Meurs, Hannah S.
Monroe, Glen R.
Veldhuis, Wouter B.
van Lonkhuijzen, Luc R.C.W.
Bennink, Roel J.
Groeneweg, Jolijn W.
Witteveen, Petronella O.
Jonges, Geertruida N.
Zweemer, Ronald P.
Braat, Arthur J.A.T.
author_facet Roze, Joline F.
van Meurs, Hannah S.
Monroe, Glen R.
Veldhuis, Wouter B.
van Lonkhuijzen, Luc R.C.W.
Bennink, Roel J.
Groeneweg, Jolijn W.
Witteveen, Petronella O.
Jonges, Geertruida N.
Zweemer, Ronald P.
Braat, Arthur J.A.T.
author_sort Roze, Joline F.
collection PubMed
description Purpose: Adult granulosa cell tumors (AGCTs) of the ovary represent a rare malignancy in which timing and choice of treatment is a clinical challenge. This study investigates the value of FDG-PET/CT and FES-PET/CT in monitoring recurrent AGCTs and assessing eligibility for anti-hormonal treatment. Materials and Methods: We evaluated 22 PET/CTs from recurrent AGCT patients to determine tumor FDG (n = 16) and FES (n = 6) uptake by qualitative and quantitative analysis. We included all consecutive patients from two tertiary hospitals between 2003-2020. Expression of ERα and ERβ and mitoses per 2 mm(2) were determined by immunohistochemistry and compared to FES and FDG uptake, respectively. Results: Qualitative assessment showed low-to-moderate FDG uptake in most patients (14/16), and intense uptake in 2/16. One patient with intense tumor FDG uptake had a high mitotic rate (18 per 2 mm(2)) Two out of six patients showed FES uptake on PET/CT at qualitative analysis. Lesion-based quantitative assessment showed a mean SUV(max) of 2.4 (± 0.9) on FDG-PET/CT and mean SUV(max) of 1.7 (± 0.5) on FES-PET/CT. Within patients, expression of ERα and ERβ varied and did not seem to correspond with FES uptake. In one FES positive patient, tumor locations with FES uptake remained stable or decreased in size during anti-hormonal treatment, while all FES negative locations progressed. Conclusions: This study shows that in AGCTs, FDG uptake is limited and therefore FDG-PET/CT is not advised. FES-PET/CT may be useful to non-invasively capture the estrogen receptor expression of separate tumor lesions and thus assess the potential eligibility for hormone treatment in AGCT patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8021033
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80210332021-04-15 [(18)F]FDG and [(18)F]FES positron emission tomography for disease monitoring and assessment of anti-hormonal treatment eligibility in granulosa cell tumors of the ovary Roze, Joline F. van Meurs, Hannah S. Monroe, Glen R. Veldhuis, Wouter B. van Lonkhuijzen, Luc R.C.W. Bennink, Roel J. Groeneweg, Jolijn W. Witteveen, Petronella O. Jonges, Geertruida N. Zweemer, Ronald P. Braat, Arthur J.A.T. Oncotarget Research Paper Purpose: Adult granulosa cell tumors (AGCTs) of the ovary represent a rare malignancy in which timing and choice of treatment is a clinical challenge. This study investigates the value of FDG-PET/CT and FES-PET/CT in monitoring recurrent AGCTs and assessing eligibility for anti-hormonal treatment. Materials and Methods: We evaluated 22 PET/CTs from recurrent AGCT patients to determine tumor FDG (n = 16) and FES (n = 6) uptake by qualitative and quantitative analysis. We included all consecutive patients from two tertiary hospitals between 2003-2020. Expression of ERα and ERβ and mitoses per 2 mm(2) were determined by immunohistochemistry and compared to FES and FDG uptake, respectively. Results: Qualitative assessment showed low-to-moderate FDG uptake in most patients (14/16), and intense uptake in 2/16. One patient with intense tumor FDG uptake had a high mitotic rate (18 per 2 mm(2)) Two out of six patients showed FES uptake on PET/CT at qualitative analysis. Lesion-based quantitative assessment showed a mean SUV(max) of 2.4 (± 0.9) on FDG-PET/CT and mean SUV(max) of 1.7 (± 0.5) on FES-PET/CT. Within patients, expression of ERα and ERβ varied and did not seem to correspond with FES uptake. In one FES positive patient, tumor locations with FES uptake remained stable or decreased in size during anti-hormonal treatment, while all FES negative locations progressed. Conclusions: This study shows that in AGCTs, FDG uptake is limited and therefore FDG-PET/CT is not advised. FES-PET/CT may be useful to non-invasively capture the estrogen receptor expression of separate tumor lesions and thus assess the potential eligibility for hormone treatment in AGCT patients. Impact Journals LLC 2021-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8021033/ /pubmed/33868587 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.27925 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Roze et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Roze, Joline F.
van Meurs, Hannah S.
Monroe, Glen R.
Veldhuis, Wouter B.
van Lonkhuijzen, Luc R.C.W.
Bennink, Roel J.
Groeneweg, Jolijn W.
Witteveen, Petronella O.
Jonges, Geertruida N.
Zweemer, Ronald P.
Braat, Arthur J.A.T.
[(18)F]FDG and [(18)F]FES positron emission tomography for disease monitoring and assessment of anti-hormonal treatment eligibility in granulosa cell tumors of the ovary
title [(18)F]FDG and [(18)F]FES positron emission tomography for disease monitoring and assessment of anti-hormonal treatment eligibility in granulosa cell tumors of the ovary
title_full [(18)F]FDG and [(18)F]FES positron emission tomography for disease monitoring and assessment of anti-hormonal treatment eligibility in granulosa cell tumors of the ovary
title_fullStr [(18)F]FDG and [(18)F]FES positron emission tomography for disease monitoring and assessment of anti-hormonal treatment eligibility in granulosa cell tumors of the ovary
title_full_unstemmed [(18)F]FDG and [(18)F]FES positron emission tomography for disease monitoring and assessment of anti-hormonal treatment eligibility in granulosa cell tumors of the ovary
title_short [(18)F]FDG and [(18)F]FES positron emission tomography for disease monitoring and assessment of anti-hormonal treatment eligibility in granulosa cell tumors of the ovary
title_sort [(18)f]fdg and [(18)f]fes positron emission tomography for disease monitoring and assessment of anti-hormonal treatment eligibility in granulosa cell tumors of the ovary
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8021033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33868587
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.27925
work_keys_str_mv AT rozejolinef 18ffdgand18ffespositronemissiontomographyfordiseasemonitoringandassessmentofantihormonaltreatmenteligibilityingranulosacelltumorsoftheovary
AT vanmeurshannahs 18ffdgand18ffespositronemissiontomographyfordiseasemonitoringandassessmentofantihormonaltreatmenteligibilityingranulosacelltumorsoftheovary
AT monroeglenr 18ffdgand18ffespositronemissiontomographyfordiseasemonitoringandassessmentofantihormonaltreatmenteligibilityingranulosacelltumorsoftheovary
AT veldhuiswouterb 18ffdgand18ffespositronemissiontomographyfordiseasemonitoringandassessmentofantihormonaltreatmenteligibilityingranulosacelltumorsoftheovary
AT vanlonkhuijzenlucrcw 18ffdgand18ffespositronemissiontomographyfordiseasemonitoringandassessmentofantihormonaltreatmenteligibilityingranulosacelltumorsoftheovary
AT benninkroelj 18ffdgand18ffespositronemissiontomographyfordiseasemonitoringandassessmentofantihormonaltreatmenteligibilityingranulosacelltumorsoftheovary
AT groenewegjolijnw 18ffdgand18ffespositronemissiontomographyfordiseasemonitoringandassessmentofantihormonaltreatmenteligibilityingranulosacelltumorsoftheovary
AT witteveenpetronellao 18ffdgand18ffespositronemissiontomographyfordiseasemonitoringandassessmentofantihormonaltreatmenteligibilityingranulosacelltumorsoftheovary
AT jongesgeertruidan 18ffdgand18ffespositronemissiontomographyfordiseasemonitoringandassessmentofantihormonaltreatmenteligibilityingranulosacelltumorsoftheovary
AT zweemerronaldp 18ffdgand18ffespositronemissiontomographyfordiseasemonitoringandassessmentofantihormonaltreatmenteligibilityingranulosacelltumorsoftheovary
AT braatarthurjat 18ffdgand18ffespositronemissiontomographyfordiseasemonitoringandassessmentofantihormonaltreatmenteligibilityingranulosacelltumorsoftheovary