Cargando…
Analysis of failed therapy evaluations in radioembolization of primary and secondary liver cancers
PURPOSE: To analyze patients’ characteristics and reasons for not performing planned transarterial radioembolization (TARE) in liver cancer after (99m)Tc-labeled macroaggregated albumin ((99m)Tc-MAA) evaluation. METHODS: In this retrospective single-center cohort, all patients undergoing (99m)Tc-MAA...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8021531/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33156407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-020-03443-z |
_version_ | 1783674765109624832 |
---|---|
author | Masthoff, Max Schindler, Philipp Harders, Fabian Heindel, Walter Wilms, Christian Schmidt, Hartmut H. Pascher, Andreas Stegger, Lars Rahbar, Kambiz Köhler, Michael Wildgruber, Moritz |
author_facet | Masthoff, Max Schindler, Philipp Harders, Fabian Heindel, Walter Wilms, Christian Schmidt, Hartmut H. Pascher, Andreas Stegger, Lars Rahbar, Kambiz Köhler, Michael Wildgruber, Moritz |
author_sort | Masthoff, Max |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To analyze patients’ characteristics and reasons for not performing planned transarterial radioembolization (TARE) in liver cancer after (99m)Tc-labeled macroaggregated albumin ((99m)Tc-MAA) evaluation. METHODS: In this retrospective single-center cohort, all patients undergoing (99m)Tc-MAA evaluation prior to planned TARE for primary or secondary liver cancer between 2009 and 2018 were analyzed. Patients were assigned to either “TARE” or “no TARE” group. Patients’ characteristics, arising reasons for not performing the planned TARE treatment as well as predictive factors for occurrence of these causes were analyzed. RESULTS: 436 patients [male = 248, female = 188, median age 62 (23–88) years] with (99m)Tc-MAA evaluation prior to planned TARE of primary or secondary liver cancer were included in this study. 148 patients (33.9%) did not receive planned TARE. Patients with a hepatic tumor burden > 50%, no liver cirrhosis, no previous therapies and a higher bilirubin were significantly more frequent in “no TARE” compared to “TARE” group. Main reasons for not performing TARE were extrahepatic tracer accumulation (n = 70, 40.5%), non-target accumulation of (99m)Tc-MAA (n = 27, 15.6%) or a hepatopulmonary shunt fraction of more than 20% (n = 23, 13.3%). Independent preprocedural parameters for not performing planned TARE were elevated bilirubin (p = 0.021) and creatinine (p = 0.018) and lower MELD score (p = 0.031). CONCLUSION: A substantial number of patients are precluded from TARE following (99m)Tc-MAA evaluation, which is, therefore, implicitly needed to determine contraindications to TARE and should not be refrained from in pretreatment process. However, a preceding careful patient selection is needed especially in patients with high hepatic tumor burden and alteration in lab parameters. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8021531 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80215312021-04-21 Analysis of failed therapy evaluations in radioembolization of primary and secondary liver cancers Masthoff, Max Schindler, Philipp Harders, Fabian Heindel, Walter Wilms, Christian Schmidt, Hartmut H. Pascher, Andreas Stegger, Lars Rahbar, Kambiz Köhler, Michael Wildgruber, Moritz J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Original Article – Clinical Oncology PURPOSE: To analyze patients’ characteristics and reasons for not performing planned transarterial radioembolization (TARE) in liver cancer after (99m)Tc-labeled macroaggregated albumin ((99m)Tc-MAA) evaluation. METHODS: In this retrospective single-center cohort, all patients undergoing (99m)Tc-MAA evaluation prior to planned TARE for primary or secondary liver cancer between 2009 and 2018 were analyzed. Patients were assigned to either “TARE” or “no TARE” group. Patients’ characteristics, arising reasons for not performing the planned TARE treatment as well as predictive factors for occurrence of these causes were analyzed. RESULTS: 436 patients [male = 248, female = 188, median age 62 (23–88) years] with (99m)Tc-MAA evaluation prior to planned TARE of primary or secondary liver cancer were included in this study. 148 patients (33.9%) did not receive planned TARE. Patients with a hepatic tumor burden > 50%, no liver cirrhosis, no previous therapies and a higher bilirubin were significantly more frequent in “no TARE” compared to “TARE” group. Main reasons for not performing TARE were extrahepatic tracer accumulation (n = 70, 40.5%), non-target accumulation of (99m)Tc-MAA (n = 27, 15.6%) or a hepatopulmonary shunt fraction of more than 20% (n = 23, 13.3%). Independent preprocedural parameters for not performing planned TARE were elevated bilirubin (p = 0.021) and creatinine (p = 0.018) and lower MELD score (p = 0.031). CONCLUSION: A substantial number of patients are precluded from TARE following (99m)Tc-MAA evaluation, which is, therefore, implicitly needed to determine contraindications to TARE and should not be refrained from in pretreatment process. However, a preceding careful patient selection is needed especially in patients with high hepatic tumor burden and alteration in lab parameters. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-11-06 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8021531/ /pubmed/33156407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-020-03443-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Article – Clinical Oncology Masthoff, Max Schindler, Philipp Harders, Fabian Heindel, Walter Wilms, Christian Schmidt, Hartmut H. Pascher, Andreas Stegger, Lars Rahbar, Kambiz Köhler, Michael Wildgruber, Moritz Analysis of failed therapy evaluations in radioembolization of primary and secondary liver cancers |
title | Analysis of failed therapy evaluations in radioembolization of primary and secondary liver cancers |
title_full | Analysis of failed therapy evaluations in radioembolization of primary and secondary liver cancers |
title_fullStr | Analysis of failed therapy evaluations in radioembolization of primary and secondary liver cancers |
title_full_unstemmed | Analysis of failed therapy evaluations in radioembolization of primary and secondary liver cancers |
title_short | Analysis of failed therapy evaluations in radioembolization of primary and secondary liver cancers |
title_sort | analysis of failed therapy evaluations in radioembolization of primary and secondary liver cancers |
topic | Original Article – Clinical Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8021531/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33156407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-020-03443-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT masthoffmax analysisoffailedtherapyevaluationsinradioembolizationofprimaryandsecondarylivercancers AT schindlerphilipp analysisoffailedtherapyevaluationsinradioembolizationofprimaryandsecondarylivercancers AT hardersfabian analysisoffailedtherapyevaluationsinradioembolizationofprimaryandsecondarylivercancers AT heindelwalter analysisoffailedtherapyevaluationsinradioembolizationofprimaryandsecondarylivercancers AT wilmschristian analysisoffailedtherapyevaluationsinradioembolizationofprimaryandsecondarylivercancers AT schmidthartmuth analysisoffailedtherapyevaluationsinradioembolizationofprimaryandsecondarylivercancers AT pascherandreas analysisoffailedtherapyevaluationsinradioembolizationofprimaryandsecondarylivercancers AT steggerlars analysisoffailedtherapyevaluationsinradioembolizationofprimaryandsecondarylivercancers AT rahbarkambiz analysisoffailedtherapyevaluationsinradioembolizationofprimaryandsecondarylivercancers AT kohlermichael analysisoffailedtherapyevaluationsinradioembolizationofprimaryandsecondarylivercancers AT wildgrubermoritz analysisoffailedtherapyevaluationsinradioembolizationofprimaryandsecondarylivercancers |