Cargando…

Analysis of failed therapy evaluations in radioembolization of primary and secondary liver cancers

PURPOSE: To analyze patients’ characteristics and reasons for not performing planned transarterial radioembolization (TARE) in liver cancer after (99m)Tc-labeled macroaggregated albumin ((99m)Tc-MAA) evaluation. METHODS: In this retrospective single-center cohort, all patients undergoing (99m)Tc-MAA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Masthoff, Max, Schindler, Philipp, Harders, Fabian, Heindel, Walter, Wilms, Christian, Schmidt, Hartmut H., Pascher, Andreas, Stegger, Lars, Rahbar, Kambiz, Köhler, Michael, Wildgruber, Moritz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8021531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33156407
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-020-03443-z
_version_ 1783674765109624832
author Masthoff, Max
Schindler, Philipp
Harders, Fabian
Heindel, Walter
Wilms, Christian
Schmidt, Hartmut H.
Pascher, Andreas
Stegger, Lars
Rahbar, Kambiz
Köhler, Michael
Wildgruber, Moritz
author_facet Masthoff, Max
Schindler, Philipp
Harders, Fabian
Heindel, Walter
Wilms, Christian
Schmidt, Hartmut H.
Pascher, Andreas
Stegger, Lars
Rahbar, Kambiz
Köhler, Michael
Wildgruber, Moritz
author_sort Masthoff, Max
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To analyze patients’ characteristics and reasons for not performing planned transarterial radioembolization (TARE) in liver cancer after (99m)Tc-labeled macroaggregated albumin ((99m)Tc-MAA) evaluation. METHODS: In this retrospective single-center cohort, all patients undergoing (99m)Tc-MAA evaluation prior to planned TARE for primary or secondary liver cancer between 2009 and 2018 were analyzed. Patients were assigned to either “TARE” or “no TARE” group. Patients’ characteristics, arising reasons for not performing the planned TARE treatment as well as predictive factors for occurrence of these causes were analyzed. RESULTS: 436 patients [male = 248, female = 188, median age 62 (23–88) years] with (99m)Tc-MAA evaluation prior to planned TARE of primary or secondary liver cancer were included in this study. 148 patients (33.9%) did not receive planned TARE. Patients with a hepatic tumor burden > 50%, no liver cirrhosis, no previous therapies and a higher bilirubin were significantly more frequent in “no TARE” compared to “TARE” group. Main reasons for not performing TARE were extrahepatic tracer accumulation (n = 70, 40.5%), non-target accumulation of (99m)Tc-MAA (n = 27, 15.6%) or a hepatopulmonary shunt fraction of more than 20% (n = 23, 13.3%). Independent preprocedural parameters for not performing planned TARE were elevated bilirubin (p = 0.021) and creatinine (p = 0.018) and lower MELD score (p = 0.031). CONCLUSION: A substantial number of patients are precluded from TARE following (99m)Tc-MAA evaluation, which is, therefore, implicitly needed to determine contraindications to TARE and should not be refrained from in pretreatment process. However, a preceding careful patient selection is needed especially in patients with high hepatic tumor burden and alteration in lab parameters.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8021531
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80215312021-04-21 Analysis of failed therapy evaluations in radioembolization of primary and secondary liver cancers Masthoff, Max Schindler, Philipp Harders, Fabian Heindel, Walter Wilms, Christian Schmidt, Hartmut H. Pascher, Andreas Stegger, Lars Rahbar, Kambiz Köhler, Michael Wildgruber, Moritz J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Original Article – Clinical Oncology PURPOSE: To analyze patients’ characteristics and reasons for not performing planned transarterial radioembolization (TARE) in liver cancer after (99m)Tc-labeled macroaggregated albumin ((99m)Tc-MAA) evaluation. METHODS: In this retrospective single-center cohort, all patients undergoing (99m)Tc-MAA evaluation prior to planned TARE for primary or secondary liver cancer between 2009 and 2018 were analyzed. Patients were assigned to either “TARE” or “no TARE” group. Patients’ characteristics, arising reasons for not performing the planned TARE treatment as well as predictive factors for occurrence of these causes were analyzed. RESULTS: 436 patients [male = 248, female = 188, median age 62 (23–88) years] with (99m)Tc-MAA evaluation prior to planned TARE of primary or secondary liver cancer were included in this study. 148 patients (33.9%) did not receive planned TARE. Patients with a hepatic tumor burden > 50%, no liver cirrhosis, no previous therapies and a higher bilirubin were significantly more frequent in “no TARE” compared to “TARE” group. Main reasons for not performing TARE were extrahepatic tracer accumulation (n = 70, 40.5%), non-target accumulation of (99m)Tc-MAA (n = 27, 15.6%) or a hepatopulmonary shunt fraction of more than 20% (n = 23, 13.3%). Independent preprocedural parameters for not performing planned TARE were elevated bilirubin (p = 0.021) and creatinine (p = 0.018) and lower MELD score (p = 0.031). CONCLUSION: A substantial number of patients are precluded from TARE following (99m)Tc-MAA evaluation, which is, therefore, implicitly needed to determine contraindications to TARE and should not be refrained from in pretreatment process. However, a preceding careful patient selection is needed especially in patients with high hepatic tumor burden and alteration in lab parameters. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-11-06 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8021531/ /pubmed/33156407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-020-03443-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article – Clinical Oncology
Masthoff, Max
Schindler, Philipp
Harders, Fabian
Heindel, Walter
Wilms, Christian
Schmidt, Hartmut H.
Pascher, Andreas
Stegger, Lars
Rahbar, Kambiz
Köhler, Michael
Wildgruber, Moritz
Analysis of failed therapy evaluations in radioembolization of primary and secondary liver cancers
title Analysis of failed therapy evaluations in radioembolization of primary and secondary liver cancers
title_full Analysis of failed therapy evaluations in radioembolization of primary and secondary liver cancers
title_fullStr Analysis of failed therapy evaluations in radioembolization of primary and secondary liver cancers
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of failed therapy evaluations in radioembolization of primary and secondary liver cancers
title_short Analysis of failed therapy evaluations in radioembolization of primary and secondary liver cancers
title_sort analysis of failed therapy evaluations in radioembolization of primary and secondary liver cancers
topic Original Article – Clinical Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8021531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33156407
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-020-03443-z
work_keys_str_mv AT masthoffmax analysisoffailedtherapyevaluationsinradioembolizationofprimaryandsecondarylivercancers
AT schindlerphilipp analysisoffailedtherapyevaluationsinradioembolizationofprimaryandsecondarylivercancers
AT hardersfabian analysisoffailedtherapyevaluationsinradioembolizationofprimaryandsecondarylivercancers
AT heindelwalter analysisoffailedtherapyevaluationsinradioembolizationofprimaryandsecondarylivercancers
AT wilmschristian analysisoffailedtherapyevaluationsinradioembolizationofprimaryandsecondarylivercancers
AT schmidthartmuth analysisoffailedtherapyevaluationsinradioembolizationofprimaryandsecondarylivercancers
AT pascherandreas analysisoffailedtherapyevaluationsinradioembolizationofprimaryandsecondarylivercancers
AT steggerlars analysisoffailedtherapyevaluationsinradioembolizationofprimaryandsecondarylivercancers
AT rahbarkambiz analysisoffailedtherapyevaluationsinradioembolizationofprimaryandsecondarylivercancers
AT kohlermichael analysisoffailedtherapyevaluationsinradioembolizationofprimaryandsecondarylivercancers
AT wildgrubermoritz analysisoffailedtherapyevaluationsinradioembolizationofprimaryandsecondarylivercancers