Cargando…
Absence of the celiac trunk and anomalous very low origin of the common hepatic artery arising independently from the abdominal aorta just above aortic bifurcation in patient undergoing radical pancreaticoduodenectomy
PURPOSE: Knowledge of anomalies of the celiac trunk is very important during various surgical procedures (such as pancreatic and gastric resections including Appleby operation, liver resections and liver transplantations) and as well as radiologic procedures (such as chemoembolization of pancreatic...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Paris
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8021532/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33449141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00276-020-02666-6 |
Sumario: | PURPOSE: Knowledge of anomalies of the celiac trunk is very important during various surgical procedures (such as pancreatic and gastric resections including Appleby operation, liver resections and liver transplantations) and as well as radiologic procedures (such as chemoembolization of pancreatic and hepatic tumors). METHODS: A 77-years-old woman was admitted to our department for surgical treatment of ampullary adenocarcinoma G2 confirmed in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with papillotomy and ampullary biopsy. In the contrast-enhanced computed tomography, the ampullary tumor was not visible, but the main pancreatic duct within pancreatic head and isthmus was dilated (indirect radiological tumor signs). An absence of the celiac trunk (CT) was established via computed tomography. Therefore, computed tomography-based angiography (angio-CT) of the abdominal aorta (AA) was performed before operation. RESULTS: Angio-CT confirmed an extremely rare vascular anomaly: an absence of CT. The left gastric (LGA), splenic (SA), and common hepatic (CHA) arteries connected above origin of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) from the AA. Pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) was performed. This anomaly was also confirmed intraoperatively. The postoperative course was uneventful and the patient was discharged on postoperative day 10. There were no signs of recurrence of the tumor during the 6 months follow-up. CONCLUSION: The proper preoperative identification of anomalies within major abdominal vessels and its relationship to the tumor is very important to avoid intraoperative vascular injury and major postoperative complications. |
---|