Cargando…

Neurophysiologic Profiling of At-Risk Low and Very Low Birth-Weight Infants Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Low birth-weight (LBW) and very low birth-weight (VLBW) newborns have increased risks of brain injuries, growth failure, motor difficulties, developmental coordination disorders or delay, and adult-onset vascular diseases. However, relatively little is known of the neurobiologic underpinnings. To cl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qi, Ying, He, Jingni
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8021729/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33833688
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.638868
_version_ 1783674794347069440
author Qi, Ying
He, Jingni
author_facet Qi, Ying
He, Jingni
author_sort Qi, Ying
collection PubMed
description Low birth-weight (LBW) and very low birth-weight (VLBW) newborns have increased risks of brain injuries, growth failure, motor difficulties, developmental coordination disorders or delay, and adult-onset vascular diseases. However, relatively little is known of the neurobiologic underpinnings. To clarify the pathophysiologic vulnerabilities of such neonates, we applied several advanced techniques for assessing brain physiology, namely T2-relaxation-under-spin-tagging (TRUST) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and phase-contrast (PC) MRI. This enabled quantification of oxygen extraction fraction (OEF), global cerebral blood flow (CBF), and cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO(2)). A total of 50 neonates (LBW-VLBW, 41; term controls, 9) participated in this study. LBW-VLBW neonates were further stratified as those with (LBW-VLBW-a, 24) and without (LBW-VLBW-n, 17) structural MRI (sMRI) abnormalities. TRUST and PC MRI studies were undertaken to determine OEF, CBF, and CMRO(2). Ultimately, CMRO(2) proved significantly lower (p = 0.01) in LBW-VLBW (vs term) neonates, both LBW-VLBW-a and LBW-VLBW-n subsets showing significantly greater physiologic deficits than term controls (p = 0.03 and p = 0.04, respectively). CMRO(2) and CBF in LBW-VLBW-a and LBW-VLBW-n subsets did not differ significantly (p > 0.05), although OEF showed a tendency to diverge (p = 0.15). However, OEF values in the LBW-VLBW-n subset differed significantly from those of term controls (p = 0.02). Compared with brain volume or body weight, these physiologic parameters yield higher area-under-the-curve (AUC) values for distinguishing neonates of the LBW-VLBW-a subset. The latter displayed distinct cerebral metabolic and hemodynamic, whereas changes were marginal in the LBW-VLBW-n subset (i.e., higher OEF and lower CBF and CMRO(2)) by comparison. Physiologic imaging may therefore be useful in identifying LBW-VLBW newborns at high risk of irreversible brain damage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8021729
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80217292021-04-07 Neurophysiologic Profiling of At-Risk Low and Very Low Birth-Weight Infants Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging Qi, Ying He, Jingni Front Physiol Physiology Low birth-weight (LBW) and very low birth-weight (VLBW) newborns have increased risks of brain injuries, growth failure, motor difficulties, developmental coordination disorders or delay, and adult-onset vascular diseases. However, relatively little is known of the neurobiologic underpinnings. To clarify the pathophysiologic vulnerabilities of such neonates, we applied several advanced techniques for assessing brain physiology, namely T2-relaxation-under-spin-tagging (TRUST) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and phase-contrast (PC) MRI. This enabled quantification of oxygen extraction fraction (OEF), global cerebral blood flow (CBF), and cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO(2)). A total of 50 neonates (LBW-VLBW, 41; term controls, 9) participated in this study. LBW-VLBW neonates were further stratified as those with (LBW-VLBW-a, 24) and without (LBW-VLBW-n, 17) structural MRI (sMRI) abnormalities. TRUST and PC MRI studies were undertaken to determine OEF, CBF, and CMRO(2). Ultimately, CMRO(2) proved significantly lower (p = 0.01) in LBW-VLBW (vs term) neonates, both LBW-VLBW-a and LBW-VLBW-n subsets showing significantly greater physiologic deficits than term controls (p = 0.03 and p = 0.04, respectively). CMRO(2) and CBF in LBW-VLBW-a and LBW-VLBW-n subsets did not differ significantly (p > 0.05), although OEF showed a tendency to diverge (p = 0.15). However, OEF values in the LBW-VLBW-n subset differed significantly from those of term controls (p = 0.02). Compared with brain volume or body weight, these physiologic parameters yield higher area-under-the-curve (AUC) values for distinguishing neonates of the LBW-VLBW-a subset. The latter displayed distinct cerebral metabolic and hemodynamic, whereas changes were marginal in the LBW-VLBW-n subset (i.e., higher OEF and lower CBF and CMRO(2)) by comparison. Physiologic imaging may therefore be useful in identifying LBW-VLBW newborns at high risk of irreversible brain damage. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8021729/ /pubmed/33833688 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.638868 Text en Copyright © 2021 Qi and He. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Qi, Ying
He, Jingni
Neurophysiologic Profiling of At-Risk Low and Very Low Birth-Weight Infants Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title Neurophysiologic Profiling of At-Risk Low and Very Low Birth-Weight Infants Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_full Neurophysiologic Profiling of At-Risk Low and Very Low Birth-Weight Infants Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_fullStr Neurophysiologic Profiling of At-Risk Low and Very Low Birth-Weight Infants Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_full_unstemmed Neurophysiologic Profiling of At-Risk Low and Very Low Birth-Weight Infants Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_short Neurophysiologic Profiling of At-Risk Low and Very Low Birth-Weight Infants Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_sort neurophysiologic profiling of at-risk low and very low birth-weight infants using magnetic resonance imaging
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8021729/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33833688
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.638868
work_keys_str_mv AT qiying neurophysiologicprofilingofatrisklowandverylowbirthweightinfantsusingmagneticresonanceimaging
AT hejingni neurophysiologicprofilingofatrisklowandverylowbirthweightinfantsusingmagneticresonanceimaging