Cargando…

Post-stroke Neurogenesis: Friend or Foe?

The substantial clinical burden and disability after stroke injury urges the need to explore therapeutic solutions. Recent compelling evidence supports that neurogenesis persists in the adult mammalian brain and is amenable to regulation in both physiological and pathological situations. Its ability...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cuartero, María Isabel, García-Culebras, Alicia, Torres-López, Cristina, Medina, Violeta, Fraga, Enrique, Vázquez-Reyes, Sandra, Jareño-Flores, Tania, García-Segura, Juan M., Lizasoain, Ignacio, Moro, María Ángeles
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8021779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33834025
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.657846
_version_ 1783674804140769280
author Cuartero, María Isabel
García-Culebras, Alicia
Torres-López, Cristina
Medina, Violeta
Fraga, Enrique
Vázquez-Reyes, Sandra
Jareño-Flores, Tania
García-Segura, Juan M.
Lizasoain, Ignacio
Moro, María Ángeles
author_facet Cuartero, María Isabel
García-Culebras, Alicia
Torres-López, Cristina
Medina, Violeta
Fraga, Enrique
Vázquez-Reyes, Sandra
Jareño-Flores, Tania
García-Segura, Juan M.
Lizasoain, Ignacio
Moro, María Ángeles
author_sort Cuartero, María Isabel
collection PubMed
description The substantial clinical burden and disability after stroke injury urges the need to explore therapeutic solutions. Recent compelling evidence supports that neurogenesis persists in the adult mammalian brain and is amenable to regulation in both physiological and pathological situations. Its ability to generate new neurons implies a potential to contribute to recovery after brain injury. However, post-stroke neurogenic response may have different functional consequences. On the one hand, the capacity of newborn neurons to replenish the damaged tissue may be limited. In addition, aberrant forms of neurogenesis have been identified in several insult settings. All these data suggest that adult neurogenesis is at a crossroads between the physiological and the pathological regulation of the neurological function in the injured central nervous system (CNS). Given the complexity of the CNS together with its interaction with the periphery, we ultimately lack in-depth understanding of the key cell types, cell–cell interactions, and molecular pathways involved in the neurogenic response after brain damage and their positive or otherwise deleterious impact. Here we will review the evidence on the stroke-induced neurogenic response and on its potential repercussions on functional outcome. First, we will briefly describe subventricular zone (SVZ) neurogenesis after stroke beside the main evidence supporting its positive role on functional restoration after stroke. Then, we will focus on hippocampal subgranular zone (SGZ) neurogenesis due to the relevance of hippocampus in cognitive functions; we will outline compelling evidence that supports that, after stroke, SGZ neurogenesis may adopt a maladaptive plasticity response further contributing to the development of post-stroke cognitive impairment and dementia. Finally, we will discuss the therapeutic potential of specific steps in the neurogenic cascade that might ameliorate brain malfunctioning and the development of post-stroke cognitive impairment in the chronic phase.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8021779
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80217792021-04-07 Post-stroke Neurogenesis: Friend or Foe? Cuartero, María Isabel García-Culebras, Alicia Torres-López, Cristina Medina, Violeta Fraga, Enrique Vázquez-Reyes, Sandra Jareño-Flores, Tania García-Segura, Juan M. Lizasoain, Ignacio Moro, María Ángeles Front Cell Dev Biol Cell and Developmental Biology The substantial clinical burden and disability after stroke injury urges the need to explore therapeutic solutions. Recent compelling evidence supports that neurogenesis persists in the adult mammalian brain and is amenable to regulation in both physiological and pathological situations. Its ability to generate new neurons implies a potential to contribute to recovery after brain injury. However, post-stroke neurogenic response may have different functional consequences. On the one hand, the capacity of newborn neurons to replenish the damaged tissue may be limited. In addition, aberrant forms of neurogenesis have been identified in several insult settings. All these data suggest that adult neurogenesis is at a crossroads between the physiological and the pathological regulation of the neurological function in the injured central nervous system (CNS). Given the complexity of the CNS together with its interaction with the periphery, we ultimately lack in-depth understanding of the key cell types, cell–cell interactions, and molecular pathways involved in the neurogenic response after brain damage and their positive or otherwise deleterious impact. Here we will review the evidence on the stroke-induced neurogenic response and on its potential repercussions on functional outcome. First, we will briefly describe subventricular zone (SVZ) neurogenesis after stroke beside the main evidence supporting its positive role on functional restoration after stroke. Then, we will focus on hippocampal subgranular zone (SGZ) neurogenesis due to the relevance of hippocampus in cognitive functions; we will outline compelling evidence that supports that, after stroke, SGZ neurogenesis may adopt a maladaptive plasticity response further contributing to the development of post-stroke cognitive impairment and dementia. Finally, we will discuss the therapeutic potential of specific steps in the neurogenic cascade that might ameliorate brain malfunctioning and the development of post-stroke cognitive impairment in the chronic phase. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8021779/ /pubmed/33834025 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.657846 Text en Copyright © 2021 Cuartero, García-Culebras, Torres-López, Medina, Fraga, Vázquez-Reyes, Jareño-Flores, García-Segura, Lizasoain and Moro. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cell and Developmental Biology
Cuartero, María Isabel
García-Culebras, Alicia
Torres-López, Cristina
Medina, Violeta
Fraga, Enrique
Vázquez-Reyes, Sandra
Jareño-Flores, Tania
García-Segura, Juan M.
Lizasoain, Ignacio
Moro, María Ángeles
Post-stroke Neurogenesis: Friend or Foe?
title Post-stroke Neurogenesis: Friend or Foe?
title_full Post-stroke Neurogenesis: Friend or Foe?
title_fullStr Post-stroke Neurogenesis: Friend or Foe?
title_full_unstemmed Post-stroke Neurogenesis: Friend or Foe?
title_short Post-stroke Neurogenesis: Friend or Foe?
title_sort post-stroke neurogenesis: friend or foe?
topic Cell and Developmental Biology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8021779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33834025
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.657846
work_keys_str_mv AT cuarteromariaisabel poststrokeneurogenesisfriendorfoe
AT garciaculebrasalicia poststrokeneurogenesisfriendorfoe
AT torreslopezcristina poststrokeneurogenesisfriendorfoe
AT medinavioleta poststrokeneurogenesisfriendorfoe
AT fragaenrique poststrokeneurogenesisfriendorfoe
AT vazquezreyessandra poststrokeneurogenesisfriendorfoe
AT jarenoflorestania poststrokeneurogenesisfriendorfoe
AT garciasegurajuanm poststrokeneurogenesisfriendorfoe
AT lizasoainignacio poststrokeneurogenesisfriendorfoe
AT moromariaangeles poststrokeneurogenesisfriendorfoe