Cargando…

Type I Chiari Malformation Without Concomitant Bony Instability: Assessment of Different Surgical Procedures and Outcomes in 73 Patients

OBJECTIVE: Posterior fossa decompression is the treatment of choice in type 1 Chiari malformation (CM-1) without bony instability. Although surgical fixation has been recommended by a few authors recently, comparative studies to evaluate these treatment strategies using objective outcome tools are l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rangari, Kamlesh, Das, Kuntal Kanti, Singh, Suyash, Kumar, Krishna G., Bhaisora, Kamlesh Singh, Sardhara, Jayesh, Mehrotra, Anant, Srivastava, Arun Kumar, Jaiswal, Awadhesh Kumar, Behari, Sanjay
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8021815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33819939
http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/ns.2040438.219
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: Posterior fossa decompression is the treatment of choice in type 1 Chiari malformation (CM-1) without bony instability. Although surgical fixation has been recommended by a few authors recently, comparative studies to evaluate these treatment strategies using objective outcome tools are lacking. METHODS: Seventy-three patients with pure CM-1 (posterior fossa bony decompression [PFBD], n = 21; posterior fossa bony and dural decompression [PFBDD], n = 40; and posterior fixation [PF], n = 12) underwent a postoperative outcome assessment using Chicago Chiari Outcome Score (CCOS). Logistic regression analysis detected predictors of an unfavorable outcome. RESULTS: Minimally symptomatic patients generally underwent a PFBD while most of the clinically severe patients underwent a PFBDD (p = 0.049). The mean CCOS score at discharge was highest in the PF (12.0 ± 1.41) and lowest in PFBDD group (10.98 ± 1.73, p = 0.087). Patients with minimal preoperative clinical disease severity (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 4.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29–16.31) and PFBDD (AOR, 7.56; 95% CI, 1.70–33.68) represented risks for an unfavorable short-term postoperative outcome. Though long-term outcomes (CCOS) did not differ among the 3 groups (p = 0.615), PFBD group showed the best long-term improvements (mean follow-up CCOS, 13.71 ± 0.95), PFBDD group improved to a comparable degree despite a poorer short-term outcome while PF had the lowest scores. Late deteriorations (n = 3, 4.1%) occurred in the PFBDD group. CONCLUSION: Minimally symptomatic patients and PFBDD predict a poor short-term postoperative outcome. PFBD appears to be a durable procedure while PFBDD group is marred by complications and late deteriorations. PF does not provide any better results than posterior fossa decompression alone in the long run.