Cargando…

Biomechanics of Circumferential Cervical Fixation Using Posterior Facet Cages: A Cadaveric Study

OBJECTIVE: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a common procedure for the treatment of cervical disease. Circumferential procedures are options for multilevel pathology. Potential complications of multilevel anterior procedures are dysphagia and pseudarthrosis, whereas potential compli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pereira, Bernardo de Andrada, Heller, Joshua E., Lehrman, Jennifer N., Sawa, Anna G.U., Kelly, Brian P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8021845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33819945
http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/ns.2040552.276
_version_ 1783674819223486464
author Pereira, Bernardo de Andrada
Heller, Joshua E.
Lehrman, Jennifer N.
Sawa, Anna G.U.
Kelly, Brian P.
author_facet Pereira, Bernardo de Andrada
Heller, Joshua E.
Lehrman, Jennifer N.
Sawa, Anna G.U.
Kelly, Brian P.
author_sort Pereira, Bernardo de Andrada
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a common procedure for the treatment of cervical disease. Circumferential procedures are options for multilevel pathology. Potential complications of multilevel anterior procedures are dysphagia and pseudarthrosis, whereas potential complications of posterior surgery include development of cervical kyphosis and postoperative chronic neck pain. The addition of posterior cervical cages (PCCs) to multilevel ACDF is a minimally invasive option to perform circumferential fusion. This study evaluated the biomechanical performance of 3-level circumferential fusion with PCCs as supplemental fixation to anteriorly placed allografts, with and without anterior plate fixation. METHODS: Nondestructive flexibility tests (1.5 Nm) performed on 6 cervical C2–7 cadaveric specimens intact and after discectomy (C3–6) in 3 instrumented conditions: allograft with anterior plate (G+P), PCC with allograft and plate (PCC+G+P), and PCC with allograft alone (PCC+G). Range of motion (ROM) data were analyzed using 1-way repeated-measures analysis of variance. RESULTS: All instrumented conditions resulted in significantly reduced ROM at the 3 instrumented levels (C3–6) compared to intact spinal segments in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation (p < 0.001). No significant difference in ROM was found between G+P and PCC+G+P conditions or between G+P and PCC+G conditions, indicating similar stability between these conditions in all directions of motion. CONCLUSION: All instrumented conditions resulted in considerable reduction in ROM. The added reduction in ROM through the addition of PCCs did not reach statistical significance. Circumferential fusion with anterior allograft, without plate and with PCCs, has comparable stability to ACDF with allograft and plate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8021845
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80218452021-04-13 Biomechanics of Circumferential Cervical Fixation Using Posterior Facet Cages: A Cadaveric Study Pereira, Bernardo de Andrada Heller, Joshua E. Lehrman, Jennifer N. Sawa, Anna G.U. Kelly, Brian P. Neurospine Original Article OBJECTIVE: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a common procedure for the treatment of cervical disease. Circumferential procedures are options for multilevel pathology. Potential complications of multilevel anterior procedures are dysphagia and pseudarthrosis, whereas potential complications of posterior surgery include development of cervical kyphosis and postoperative chronic neck pain. The addition of posterior cervical cages (PCCs) to multilevel ACDF is a minimally invasive option to perform circumferential fusion. This study evaluated the biomechanical performance of 3-level circumferential fusion with PCCs as supplemental fixation to anteriorly placed allografts, with and without anterior plate fixation. METHODS: Nondestructive flexibility tests (1.5 Nm) performed on 6 cervical C2–7 cadaveric specimens intact and after discectomy (C3–6) in 3 instrumented conditions: allograft with anterior plate (G+P), PCC with allograft and plate (PCC+G+P), and PCC with allograft alone (PCC+G). Range of motion (ROM) data were analyzed using 1-way repeated-measures analysis of variance. RESULTS: All instrumented conditions resulted in significantly reduced ROM at the 3 instrumented levels (C3–6) compared to intact spinal segments in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation (p < 0.001). No significant difference in ROM was found between G+P and PCC+G+P conditions or between G+P and PCC+G conditions, indicating similar stability between these conditions in all directions of motion. CONCLUSION: All instrumented conditions resulted in considerable reduction in ROM. The added reduction in ROM through the addition of PCCs did not reach statistical significance. Circumferential fusion with anterior allograft, without plate and with PCCs, has comparable stability to ACDF with allograft and plate. Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society 2021-03 2021-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8021845/ /pubmed/33819945 http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/ns.2040552.276 Text en Copyright © 2021 by the Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Pereira, Bernardo de Andrada
Heller, Joshua E.
Lehrman, Jennifer N.
Sawa, Anna G.U.
Kelly, Brian P.
Biomechanics of Circumferential Cervical Fixation Using Posterior Facet Cages: A Cadaveric Study
title Biomechanics of Circumferential Cervical Fixation Using Posterior Facet Cages: A Cadaveric Study
title_full Biomechanics of Circumferential Cervical Fixation Using Posterior Facet Cages: A Cadaveric Study
title_fullStr Biomechanics of Circumferential Cervical Fixation Using Posterior Facet Cages: A Cadaveric Study
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanics of Circumferential Cervical Fixation Using Posterior Facet Cages: A Cadaveric Study
title_short Biomechanics of Circumferential Cervical Fixation Using Posterior Facet Cages: A Cadaveric Study
title_sort biomechanics of circumferential cervical fixation using posterior facet cages: a cadaveric study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8021845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33819945
http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/ns.2040552.276
work_keys_str_mv AT pereirabernardodeandrada biomechanicsofcircumferentialcervicalfixationusingposteriorfacetcagesacadavericstudy
AT hellerjoshuae biomechanicsofcircumferentialcervicalfixationusingposteriorfacetcagesacadavericstudy
AT lehrmanjennifern biomechanicsofcircumferentialcervicalfixationusingposteriorfacetcagesacadavericstudy
AT sawaannagu biomechanicsofcircumferentialcervicalfixationusingposteriorfacetcagesacadavericstudy
AT kellybrianp biomechanicsofcircumferentialcervicalfixationusingposteriorfacetcagesacadavericstudy