Cargando…
Biomechanics of Circumferential Cervical Fixation Using Posterior Facet Cages: A Cadaveric Study
OBJECTIVE: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a common procedure for the treatment of cervical disease. Circumferential procedures are options for multilevel pathology. Potential complications of multilevel anterior procedures are dysphagia and pseudarthrosis, whereas potential compli...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8021845/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33819945 http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/ns.2040552.276 |
_version_ | 1783674819223486464 |
---|---|
author | Pereira, Bernardo de Andrada Heller, Joshua E. Lehrman, Jennifer N. Sawa, Anna G.U. Kelly, Brian P. |
author_facet | Pereira, Bernardo de Andrada Heller, Joshua E. Lehrman, Jennifer N. Sawa, Anna G.U. Kelly, Brian P. |
author_sort | Pereira, Bernardo de Andrada |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a common procedure for the treatment of cervical disease. Circumferential procedures are options for multilevel pathology. Potential complications of multilevel anterior procedures are dysphagia and pseudarthrosis, whereas potential complications of posterior surgery include development of cervical kyphosis and postoperative chronic neck pain. The addition of posterior cervical cages (PCCs) to multilevel ACDF is a minimally invasive option to perform circumferential fusion. This study evaluated the biomechanical performance of 3-level circumferential fusion with PCCs as supplemental fixation to anteriorly placed allografts, with and without anterior plate fixation. METHODS: Nondestructive flexibility tests (1.5 Nm) performed on 6 cervical C2–7 cadaveric specimens intact and after discectomy (C3–6) in 3 instrumented conditions: allograft with anterior plate (G+P), PCC with allograft and plate (PCC+G+P), and PCC with allograft alone (PCC+G). Range of motion (ROM) data were analyzed using 1-way repeated-measures analysis of variance. RESULTS: All instrumented conditions resulted in significantly reduced ROM at the 3 instrumented levels (C3–6) compared to intact spinal segments in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation (p < 0.001). No significant difference in ROM was found between G+P and PCC+G+P conditions or between G+P and PCC+G conditions, indicating similar stability between these conditions in all directions of motion. CONCLUSION: All instrumented conditions resulted in considerable reduction in ROM. The added reduction in ROM through the addition of PCCs did not reach statistical significance. Circumferential fusion with anterior allograft, without plate and with PCCs, has comparable stability to ACDF with allograft and plate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8021845 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80218452021-04-13 Biomechanics of Circumferential Cervical Fixation Using Posterior Facet Cages: A Cadaveric Study Pereira, Bernardo de Andrada Heller, Joshua E. Lehrman, Jennifer N. Sawa, Anna G.U. Kelly, Brian P. Neurospine Original Article OBJECTIVE: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a common procedure for the treatment of cervical disease. Circumferential procedures are options for multilevel pathology. Potential complications of multilevel anterior procedures are dysphagia and pseudarthrosis, whereas potential complications of posterior surgery include development of cervical kyphosis and postoperative chronic neck pain. The addition of posterior cervical cages (PCCs) to multilevel ACDF is a minimally invasive option to perform circumferential fusion. This study evaluated the biomechanical performance of 3-level circumferential fusion with PCCs as supplemental fixation to anteriorly placed allografts, with and without anterior plate fixation. METHODS: Nondestructive flexibility tests (1.5 Nm) performed on 6 cervical C2–7 cadaveric specimens intact and after discectomy (C3–6) in 3 instrumented conditions: allograft with anterior plate (G+P), PCC with allograft and plate (PCC+G+P), and PCC with allograft alone (PCC+G). Range of motion (ROM) data were analyzed using 1-way repeated-measures analysis of variance. RESULTS: All instrumented conditions resulted in significantly reduced ROM at the 3 instrumented levels (C3–6) compared to intact spinal segments in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation (p < 0.001). No significant difference in ROM was found between G+P and PCC+G+P conditions or between G+P and PCC+G conditions, indicating similar stability between these conditions in all directions of motion. CONCLUSION: All instrumented conditions resulted in considerable reduction in ROM. The added reduction in ROM through the addition of PCCs did not reach statistical significance. Circumferential fusion with anterior allograft, without plate and with PCCs, has comparable stability to ACDF with allograft and plate. Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society 2021-03 2021-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8021845/ /pubmed/33819945 http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/ns.2040552.276 Text en Copyright © 2021 by the Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Pereira, Bernardo de Andrada Heller, Joshua E. Lehrman, Jennifer N. Sawa, Anna G.U. Kelly, Brian P. Biomechanics of Circumferential Cervical Fixation Using Posterior Facet Cages: A Cadaveric Study |
title | Biomechanics of Circumferential Cervical Fixation Using Posterior Facet Cages: A Cadaveric Study |
title_full | Biomechanics of Circumferential Cervical Fixation Using Posterior Facet Cages: A Cadaveric Study |
title_fullStr | Biomechanics of Circumferential Cervical Fixation Using Posterior Facet Cages: A Cadaveric Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Biomechanics of Circumferential Cervical Fixation Using Posterior Facet Cages: A Cadaveric Study |
title_short | Biomechanics of Circumferential Cervical Fixation Using Posterior Facet Cages: A Cadaveric Study |
title_sort | biomechanics of circumferential cervical fixation using posterior facet cages: a cadaveric study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8021845/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33819945 http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/ns.2040552.276 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pereirabernardodeandrada biomechanicsofcircumferentialcervicalfixationusingposteriorfacetcagesacadavericstudy AT hellerjoshuae biomechanicsofcircumferentialcervicalfixationusingposteriorfacetcagesacadavericstudy AT lehrmanjennifern biomechanicsofcircumferentialcervicalfixationusingposteriorfacetcagesacadavericstudy AT sawaannagu biomechanicsofcircumferentialcervicalfixationusingposteriorfacetcagesacadavericstudy AT kellybrianp biomechanicsofcircumferentialcervicalfixationusingposteriorfacetcagesacadavericstudy |