Cargando…
A Comparison for Dimensionality Reduction Methods of Single-Cell RNA-seq Data
Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) is a high-throughput sequencing technology performed at the level of an individual cell, which can have a potential to understand cellular heterogeneity. However, scRNA-seq data are high-dimensional, noisy, and sparse data. Dimension reduction is an important s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8021860/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33833778 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.646936 |
_version_ | 1783674822707904512 |
---|---|
author | Xiang, Ruizhi Wang, Wencan Yang, Lei Wang, Shiyuan Xu, Chaohan Chen, Xiaowen |
author_facet | Xiang, Ruizhi Wang, Wencan Yang, Lei Wang, Shiyuan Xu, Chaohan Chen, Xiaowen |
author_sort | Xiang, Ruizhi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) is a high-throughput sequencing technology performed at the level of an individual cell, which can have a potential to understand cellular heterogeneity. However, scRNA-seq data are high-dimensional, noisy, and sparse data. Dimension reduction is an important step in downstream analysis of scRNA-seq. Therefore, several dimension reduction methods have been developed. We developed a strategy to evaluate the stability, accuracy, and computing cost of 10 dimensionality reduction methods using 30 simulation datasets and five real datasets. Additionally, we investigated the sensitivity of all the methods to hyperparameter tuning and gave users appropriate suggestions. We found that t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) yielded the best overall performance with the highest accuracy and computing cost. Meanwhile, uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) exhibited the highest stability, as well as moderate accuracy and the second highest computing cost. UMAP well preserves the original cohesion and separation of cell populations. In addition, it is worth noting that users need to set the hyperparameters according to the specific situation before using the dimensionality reduction methods based on non-linear model and neural network. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8021860 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80218602021-04-07 A Comparison for Dimensionality Reduction Methods of Single-Cell RNA-seq Data Xiang, Ruizhi Wang, Wencan Yang, Lei Wang, Shiyuan Xu, Chaohan Chen, Xiaowen Front Genet Genetics Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) is a high-throughput sequencing technology performed at the level of an individual cell, which can have a potential to understand cellular heterogeneity. However, scRNA-seq data are high-dimensional, noisy, and sparse data. Dimension reduction is an important step in downstream analysis of scRNA-seq. Therefore, several dimension reduction methods have been developed. We developed a strategy to evaluate the stability, accuracy, and computing cost of 10 dimensionality reduction methods using 30 simulation datasets and five real datasets. Additionally, we investigated the sensitivity of all the methods to hyperparameter tuning and gave users appropriate suggestions. We found that t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) yielded the best overall performance with the highest accuracy and computing cost. Meanwhile, uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) exhibited the highest stability, as well as moderate accuracy and the second highest computing cost. UMAP well preserves the original cohesion and separation of cell populations. In addition, it is worth noting that users need to set the hyperparameters according to the specific situation before using the dimensionality reduction methods based on non-linear model and neural network. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8021860/ /pubmed/33833778 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.646936 Text en Copyright © 2021 Xiang, Wang, Yang, Wang, Xu and Chen. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Genetics Xiang, Ruizhi Wang, Wencan Yang, Lei Wang, Shiyuan Xu, Chaohan Chen, Xiaowen A Comparison for Dimensionality Reduction Methods of Single-Cell RNA-seq Data |
title | A Comparison for Dimensionality Reduction Methods of Single-Cell RNA-seq Data |
title_full | A Comparison for Dimensionality Reduction Methods of Single-Cell RNA-seq Data |
title_fullStr | A Comparison for Dimensionality Reduction Methods of Single-Cell RNA-seq Data |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison for Dimensionality Reduction Methods of Single-Cell RNA-seq Data |
title_short | A Comparison for Dimensionality Reduction Methods of Single-Cell RNA-seq Data |
title_sort | comparison for dimensionality reduction methods of single-cell rna-seq data |
topic | Genetics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8021860/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33833778 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.646936 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xiangruizhi acomparisonfordimensionalityreductionmethodsofsinglecellrnaseqdata AT wangwencan acomparisonfordimensionalityreductionmethodsofsinglecellrnaseqdata AT yanglei acomparisonfordimensionalityreductionmethodsofsinglecellrnaseqdata AT wangshiyuan acomparisonfordimensionalityreductionmethodsofsinglecellrnaseqdata AT xuchaohan acomparisonfordimensionalityreductionmethodsofsinglecellrnaseqdata AT chenxiaowen acomparisonfordimensionalityreductionmethodsofsinglecellrnaseqdata AT xiangruizhi comparisonfordimensionalityreductionmethodsofsinglecellrnaseqdata AT wangwencan comparisonfordimensionalityreductionmethodsofsinglecellrnaseqdata AT yanglei comparisonfordimensionalityreductionmethodsofsinglecellrnaseqdata AT wangshiyuan comparisonfordimensionalityreductionmethodsofsinglecellrnaseqdata AT xuchaohan comparisonfordimensionalityreductionmethodsofsinglecellrnaseqdata AT chenxiaowen comparisonfordimensionalityreductionmethodsofsinglecellrnaseqdata |