Cargando…

Baseline incision characteristics and early scar maturation indices following cardiac device implantation

AIMS: Dermatologic evaluation for cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) has not been established. We sought to ascertain baseline wound scar features using quantifiable surgical tools and scar scales on post‐CIED patients. METHODS: A single‐center, prospective observational case‐control stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mehta, Nishaki Kiran, Morgaenko, Katerina, Haines, David, Rojas‐Pena, Edward, Heard, Brittney, Malhotra, Rohit, Darby, Andrew, Mangrum, James Michael, Mason, Pamela, Campbell, Christopher, Bilchick, Kenneth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8021997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33850582
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12464
_version_ 1783674852281942016
author Mehta, Nishaki Kiran
Morgaenko, Katerina
Haines, David
Rojas‐Pena, Edward
Heard, Brittney
Malhotra, Rohit
Darby, Andrew
Mangrum, James Michael
Mason, Pamela
Campbell, Christopher
Bilchick, Kenneth
author_facet Mehta, Nishaki Kiran
Morgaenko, Katerina
Haines, David
Rojas‐Pena, Edward
Heard, Brittney
Malhotra, Rohit
Darby, Andrew
Mangrum, James Michael
Mason, Pamela
Campbell, Christopher
Bilchick, Kenneth
author_sort Mehta, Nishaki Kiran
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Dermatologic evaluation for cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) has not been established. We sought to ascertain baseline wound scar features using quantifiable surgical tools and scar scales on post‐CIED patients. METHODS: A single‐center, prospective observational case‐control study was performed where 92 study subjects (40 healthy volunteers and 52 post‐CIED patients) completed the study. Durometer was used to quantify skin pliability before CIED placement, postprocedure, and 2 weeks postprocedure. Higher durometer readings signified reduced skin pliability. Durometer readings were compared to the patients’ contralateral pectoral skin and to a healthy volunteer's cohort skin within the prepectoral region. Patient wounds were observed and graded using the Patient Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and Manchester Scar Scale (MSS). RESULTS: Baseline pectoral skin pliability readings were similar in healthy volunteers and CIED patient population. In comparison to preprocedural measurements, surgical site skin pliability decreased in postprocedural and 2 weeks follow‐up time points (P‐value .004 and <.001, respectively). The increases in durometer readings were higher in the older population (age >75 over time, P = .008). POSAS evaluations showed on average a thin painless hypopigmented scar with moderate stiffness. MSS scar evaluation showed a palpable scar with slight contour differences and color mismatch and appeared to be slightly better in the African American population. There was no difference in scar characteristics with preprocedural use of antiplatelet or anticoagulation or staple closure or gender. CONCLUSIONS: Serial measurements could be of value for development of new strategies for cosmesis and improved wound healing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8021997
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80219972021-04-12 Baseline incision characteristics and early scar maturation indices following cardiac device implantation Mehta, Nishaki Kiran Morgaenko, Katerina Haines, David Rojas‐Pena, Edward Heard, Brittney Malhotra, Rohit Darby, Andrew Mangrum, James Michael Mason, Pamela Campbell, Christopher Bilchick, Kenneth J Arrhythm Original Articles AIMS: Dermatologic evaluation for cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) has not been established. We sought to ascertain baseline wound scar features using quantifiable surgical tools and scar scales on post‐CIED patients. METHODS: A single‐center, prospective observational case‐control study was performed where 92 study subjects (40 healthy volunteers and 52 post‐CIED patients) completed the study. Durometer was used to quantify skin pliability before CIED placement, postprocedure, and 2 weeks postprocedure. Higher durometer readings signified reduced skin pliability. Durometer readings were compared to the patients’ contralateral pectoral skin and to a healthy volunteer's cohort skin within the prepectoral region. Patient wounds were observed and graded using the Patient Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and Manchester Scar Scale (MSS). RESULTS: Baseline pectoral skin pliability readings were similar in healthy volunteers and CIED patient population. In comparison to preprocedural measurements, surgical site skin pliability decreased in postprocedural and 2 weeks follow‐up time points (P‐value .004 and <.001, respectively). The increases in durometer readings were higher in the older population (age >75 over time, P = .008). POSAS evaluations showed on average a thin painless hypopigmented scar with moderate stiffness. MSS scar evaluation showed a palpable scar with slight contour differences and color mismatch and appeared to be slightly better in the African American population. There was no difference in scar characteristics with preprocedural use of antiplatelet or anticoagulation or staple closure or gender. CONCLUSIONS: Serial measurements could be of value for development of new strategies for cosmesis and improved wound healing. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8021997/ /pubmed/33850582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12464 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Arrhythmia published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of the Japanese Heart Rhythm Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Mehta, Nishaki Kiran
Morgaenko, Katerina
Haines, David
Rojas‐Pena, Edward
Heard, Brittney
Malhotra, Rohit
Darby, Andrew
Mangrum, James Michael
Mason, Pamela
Campbell, Christopher
Bilchick, Kenneth
Baseline incision characteristics and early scar maturation indices following cardiac device implantation
title Baseline incision characteristics and early scar maturation indices following cardiac device implantation
title_full Baseline incision characteristics and early scar maturation indices following cardiac device implantation
title_fullStr Baseline incision characteristics and early scar maturation indices following cardiac device implantation
title_full_unstemmed Baseline incision characteristics and early scar maturation indices following cardiac device implantation
title_short Baseline incision characteristics and early scar maturation indices following cardiac device implantation
title_sort baseline incision characteristics and early scar maturation indices following cardiac device implantation
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8021997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33850582
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12464
work_keys_str_mv AT mehtanishakikiran baselineincisioncharacteristicsandearlyscarmaturationindicesfollowingcardiacdeviceimplantation
AT morgaenkokaterina baselineincisioncharacteristicsandearlyscarmaturationindicesfollowingcardiacdeviceimplantation
AT hainesdavid baselineincisioncharacteristicsandearlyscarmaturationindicesfollowingcardiacdeviceimplantation
AT rojaspenaedward baselineincisioncharacteristicsandearlyscarmaturationindicesfollowingcardiacdeviceimplantation
AT heardbrittney baselineincisioncharacteristicsandearlyscarmaturationindicesfollowingcardiacdeviceimplantation
AT malhotrarohit baselineincisioncharacteristicsandearlyscarmaturationindicesfollowingcardiacdeviceimplantation
AT darbyandrew baselineincisioncharacteristicsandearlyscarmaturationindicesfollowingcardiacdeviceimplantation
AT mangrumjamesmichael baselineincisioncharacteristicsandearlyscarmaturationindicesfollowingcardiacdeviceimplantation
AT masonpamela baselineincisioncharacteristicsandearlyscarmaturationindicesfollowingcardiacdeviceimplantation
AT campbellchristopher baselineincisioncharacteristicsandearlyscarmaturationindicesfollowingcardiacdeviceimplantation
AT bilchickkenneth baselineincisioncharacteristicsandearlyscarmaturationindicesfollowingcardiacdeviceimplantation