Cargando…
Baseline incision characteristics and early scar maturation indices following cardiac device implantation
AIMS: Dermatologic evaluation for cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) has not been established. We sought to ascertain baseline wound scar features using quantifiable surgical tools and scar scales on post‐CIED patients. METHODS: A single‐center, prospective observational case‐control stu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8021997/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33850582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12464 |
_version_ | 1783674852281942016 |
---|---|
author | Mehta, Nishaki Kiran Morgaenko, Katerina Haines, David Rojas‐Pena, Edward Heard, Brittney Malhotra, Rohit Darby, Andrew Mangrum, James Michael Mason, Pamela Campbell, Christopher Bilchick, Kenneth |
author_facet | Mehta, Nishaki Kiran Morgaenko, Katerina Haines, David Rojas‐Pena, Edward Heard, Brittney Malhotra, Rohit Darby, Andrew Mangrum, James Michael Mason, Pamela Campbell, Christopher Bilchick, Kenneth |
author_sort | Mehta, Nishaki Kiran |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: Dermatologic evaluation for cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) has not been established. We sought to ascertain baseline wound scar features using quantifiable surgical tools and scar scales on post‐CIED patients. METHODS: A single‐center, prospective observational case‐control study was performed where 92 study subjects (40 healthy volunteers and 52 post‐CIED patients) completed the study. Durometer was used to quantify skin pliability before CIED placement, postprocedure, and 2 weeks postprocedure. Higher durometer readings signified reduced skin pliability. Durometer readings were compared to the patients’ contralateral pectoral skin and to a healthy volunteer's cohort skin within the prepectoral region. Patient wounds were observed and graded using the Patient Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and Manchester Scar Scale (MSS). RESULTS: Baseline pectoral skin pliability readings were similar in healthy volunteers and CIED patient population. In comparison to preprocedural measurements, surgical site skin pliability decreased in postprocedural and 2 weeks follow‐up time points (P‐value .004 and <.001, respectively). The increases in durometer readings were higher in the older population (age >75 over time, P = .008). POSAS evaluations showed on average a thin painless hypopigmented scar with moderate stiffness. MSS scar evaluation showed a palpable scar with slight contour differences and color mismatch and appeared to be slightly better in the African American population. There was no difference in scar characteristics with preprocedural use of antiplatelet or anticoagulation or staple closure or gender. CONCLUSIONS: Serial measurements could be of value for development of new strategies for cosmesis and improved wound healing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8021997 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80219972021-04-12 Baseline incision characteristics and early scar maturation indices following cardiac device implantation Mehta, Nishaki Kiran Morgaenko, Katerina Haines, David Rojas‐Pena, Edward Heard, Brittney Malhotra, Rohit Darby, Andrew Mangrum, James Michael Mason, Pamela Campbell, Christopher Bilchick, Kenneth J Arrhythm Original Articles AIMS: Dermatologic evaluation for cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) has not been established. We sought to ascertain baseline wound scar features using quantifiable surgical tools and scar scales on post‐CIED patients. METHODS: A single‐center, prospective observational case‐control study was performed where 92 study subjects (40 healthy volunteers and 52 post‐CIED patients) completed the study. Durometer was used to quantify skin pliability before CIED placement, postprocedure, and 2 weeks postprocedure. Higher durometer readings signified reduced skin pliability. Durometer readings were compared to the patients’ contralateral pectoral skin and to a healthy volunteer's cohort skin within the prepectoral region. Patient wounds were observed and graded using the Patient Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and Manchester Scar Scale (MSS). RESULTS: Baseline pectoral skin pliability readings were similar in healthy volunteers and CIED patient population. In comparison to preprocedural measurements, surgical site skin pliability decreased in postprocedural and 2 weeks follow‐up time points (P‐value .004 and <.001, respectively). The increases in durometer readings were higher in the older population (age >75 over time, P = .008). POSAS evaluations showed on average a thin painless hypopigmented scar with moderate stiffness. MSS scar evaluation showed a palpable scar with slight contour differences and color mismatch and appeared to be slightly better in the African American population. There was no difference in scar characteristics with preprocedural use of antiplatelet or anticoagulation or staple closure or gender. CONCLUSIONS: Serial measurements could be of value for development of new strategies for cosmesis and improved wound healing. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8021997/ /pubmed/33850582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12464 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Arrhythmia published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of the Japanese Heart Rhythm Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Mehta, Nishaki Kiran Morgaenko, Katerina Haines, David Rojas‐Pena, Edward Heard, Brittney Malhotra, Rohit Darby, Andrew Mangrum, James Michael Mason, Pamela Campbell, Christopher Bilchick, Kenneth Baseline incision characteristics and early scar maturation indices following cardiac device implantation |
title | Baseline incision characteristics and early scar maturation indices following cardiac device implantation |
title_full | Baseline incision characteristics and early scar maturation indices following cardiac device implantation |
title_fullStr | Baseline incision characteristics and early scar maturation indices following cardiac device implantation |
title_full_unstemmed | Baseline incision characteristics and early scar maturation indices following cardiac device implantation |
title_short | Baseline incision characteristics and early scar maturation indices following cardiac device implantation |
title_sort | baseline incision characteristics and early scar maturation indices following cardiac device implantation |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8021997/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33850582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12464 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mehtanishakikiran baselineincisioncharacteristicsandearlyscarmaturationindicesfollowingcardiacdeviceimplantation AT morgaenkokaterina baselineincisioncharacteristicsandearlyscarmaturationindicesfollowingcardiacdeviceimplantation AT hainesdavid baselineincisioncharacteristicsandearlyscarmaturationindicesfollowingcardiacdeviceimplantation AT rojaspenaedward baselineincisioncharacteristicsandearlyscarmaturationindicesfollowingcardiacdeviceimplantation AT heardbrittney baselineincisioncharacteristicsandearlyscarmaturationindicesfollowingcardiacdeviceimplantation AT malhotrarohit baselineincisioncharacteristicsandearlyscarmaturationindicesfollowingcardiacdeviceimplantation AT darbyandrew baselineincisioncharacteristicsandearlyscarmaturationindicesfollowingcardiacdeviceimplantation AT mangrumjamesmichael baselineincisioncharacteristicsandearlyscarmaturationindicesfollowingcardiacdeviceimplantation AT masonpamela baselineincisioncharacteristicsandearlyscarmaturationindicesfollowingcardiacdeviceimplantation AT campbellchristopher baselineincisioncharacteristicsandearlyscarmaturationindicesfollowingcardiacdeviceimplantation AT bilchickkenneth baselineincisioncharacteristicsandearlyscarmaturationindicesfollowingcardiacdeviceimplantation |