Cargando…

Signal averaged ECG in patients with early repolarization

BACKGROUND: Early repolarization (ER) pattern is diagnosed when the J‐point is elevated on the patient's electrocardiogram. The aim of this study was to evaluate signal‐averaged electrocardiography (SAECG) in patients with ER pattern. METHODS: Subjects were divided into three groups: 1‐patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hassanzadeh, Mani, Mardani, Ehsan, Hosseinpour, Alireza, Mehdipour Namdar, Zahra, Shahrzad, Shahab, Aslani, Amir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8022001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33850585
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12523
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Early repolarization (ER) pattern is diagnosed when the J‐point is elevated on the patient's electrocardiogram. The aim of this study was to evaluate signal‐averaged electrocardiography (SAECG) in patients with ER pattern. METHODS: Subjects were divided into three groups: 1‐patients with normal ECG pattern (control group); 2‐patients with J‐point elevation in the inferior leads; and 3‐patients with J‐point elevation in non‐inferior leads. RESULTS: The mean filtered QRS duration in groups with J‐point elevation in inferior leads and non‐inferior leads and in the control, was 86.4 ± 23.4 msec, 84.8 ± 26.6 msec, and 85.8 ± 24.8 msec, respectively, indicating no significant difference across the three groups. The mean duration of terminal QRS < 40µV was 21.2 ± 4.2 msec, 22.8 ± 4.6 msec, and 23.1 ± 4.5 msec in the mentioned groups, respectively, without a significant difference between the groups. Additionally, the mean root‐mean‐square voltage of terminal 40 msec was 34.5 ± 8.3 µV, 35.3 ± 8.6µV, and 35.7 ± 9.2 µV in patients with increased J‐point in inferior leads, non‐inferior leads, and the control group, respectively, showing no difference between the groups. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, we found that parameters in SAECG did not have any significant difference between patients with ER pattern and healthy individuals. Moreover, we concluded that SAECG cannot distinguish the patients with elevated J‐point in inferior leads from non‐inferior leads. Overall, SAECG does not appear to be a reliable diagnostic tool for the assessment of ER pattern.