Cargando…
Current Social Media Use Among Radiation Oncology Trainees
PURPOSE: Resident physicians use social media (SM) for many reasons. We sought to characterize current SM use by radiation oncology (RO) trainees for education and professional development. METHODS AND MATERIALS: An anonymous 40-question survey was sent by e-mail to RO residents in the 2018 to 2019...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8022140/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33851064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2020.100642 |
_version_ | 1783674883527409664 |
---|---|
author | Albert, Ashley Kahn, Jenna M. Knoll, Miriam A. Lirette, Seth Yechieli, Raphael Gerber, Naamit K. Jagsi, Reshma Katz, Matthew S. |
author_facet | Albert, Ashley Kahn, Jenna M. Knoll, Miriam A. Lirette, Seth Yechieli, Raphael Gerber, Naamit K. Jagsi, Reshma Katz, Matthew S. |
author_sort | Albert, Ashley |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Resident physicians use social media (SM) for many reasons. We sought to characterize current SM use by radiation oncology (RO) trainees for education and professional development. METHODS AND MATERIALS: An anonymous 40-question survey was sent by e-mail to RO residents in the 2018 to 2019 academic year. SM platform use, time spent on SM, professional use, and opinions regarding SM use were assessed. Descriptive statistics and a univariate logistic regression analysis were performed to identify factors associated with perceptions of SM and spending >25% of SM time for academic or professional purposes. RESULTS: Of the 615 residents surveyed, 149 responded (24% response rate). Facebook (73%), theMednet (62%), Instagram (59%), Twitter (57%), and Doximity (50%) were the top SM platforms used. Most respondents (53%) reported <25% of overall SM time on professional/academic purposes, and 21% reported using SM >60 minutes per day over the past week. Residents with an RO mentor on SM (n = 35; 24%; odds ratio [OR]: 2.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29-6.08; P = .010), those participating in RO discussions on SM (n = 71; 48%; OR: 2.85; 95% CI, 1.42-5.72; P = .003), and those interacting with professional societies (n = 69; 46%; OR: 7.11; 95% CI, 3.32-15.24; P < .001) were more likely to spend >25% of their SM time on professional/academic purposes. The vast majority of respondents agreed that SM exposed them to novel educational content (82%) and was helpful for career development (65%). In addition, 69% agreed that SM can improve clinical skills and knowledge. A substantial minority agreed that SM distracts them from studying (38%) or they felt pressure to have a SM presence (29%). CONCLUSIONS: Most RO residents reported that SM provides novel educational content and can help with career development. Potential disadvantages of SM for trainees may include distraction and pressure to maintain a SM presence. SM use by RO trainees merits further research to optimize its potential for education and professional development. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8022140 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80221402021-04-12 Current Social Media Use Among Radiation Oncology Trainees Albert, Ashley Kahn, Jenna M. Knoll, Miriam A. Lirette, Seth Yechieli, Raphael Gerber, Naamit K. Jagsi, Reshma Katz, Matthew S. Adv Radiat Oncol Scientific Article PURPOSE: Resident physicians use social media (SM) for many reasons. We sought to characterize current SM use by radiation oncology (RO) trainees for education and professional development. METHODS AND MATERIALS: An anonymous 40-question survey was sent by e-mail to RO residents in the 2018 to 2019 academic year. SM platform use, time spent on SM, professional use, and opinions regarding SM use were assessed. Descriptive statistics and a univariate logistic regression analysis were performed to identify factors associated with perceptions of SM and spending >25% of SM time for academic or professional purposes. RESULTS: Of the 615 residents surveyed, 149 responded (24% response rate). Facebook (73%), theMednet (62%), Instagram (59%), Twitter (57%), and Doximity (50%) were the top SM platforms used. Most respondents (53%) reported <25% of overall SM time on professional/academic purposes, and 21% reported using SM >60 minutes per day over the past week. Residents with an RO mentor on SM (n = 35; 24%; odds ratio [OR]: 2.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29-6.08; P = .010), those participating in RO discussions on SM (n = 71; 48%; OR: 2.85; 95% CI, 1.42-5.72; P = .003), and those interacting with professional societies (n = 69; 46%; OR: 7.11; 95% CI, 3.32-15.24; P < .001) were more likely to spend >25% of their SM time on professional/academic purposes. The vast majority of respondents agreed that SM exposed them to novel educational content (82%) and was helpful for career development (65%). In addition, 69% agreed that SM can improve clinical skills and knowledge. A substantial minority agreed that SM distracts them from studying (38%) or they felt pressure to have a SM presence (29%). CONCLUSIONS: Most RO residents reported that SM provides novel educational content and can help with career development. Potential disadvantages of SM for trainees may include distraction and pressure to maintain a SM presence. SM use by RO trainees merits further research to optimize its potential for education and professional development. Elsevier 2020-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8022140/ /pubmed/33851064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2020.100642 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Scientific Article Albert, Ashley Kahn, Jenna M. Knoll, Miriam A. Lirette, Seth Yechieli, Raphael Gerber, Naamit K. Jagsi, Reshma Katz, Matthew S. Current Social Media Use Among Radiation Oncology Trainees |
title | Current Social Media Use Among Radiation Oncology Trainees |
title_full | Current Social Media Use Among Radiation Oncology Trainees |
title_fullStr | Current Social Media Use Among Radiation Oncology Trainees |
title_full_unstemmed | Current Social Media Use Among Radiation Oncology Trainees |
title_short | Current Social Media Use Among Radiation Oncology Trainees |
title_sort | current social media use among radiation oncology trainees |
topic | Scientific Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8022140/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33851064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2020.100642 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT albertashley currentsocialmediauseamongradiationoncologytrainees AT kahnjennam currentsocialmediauseamongradiationoncologytrainees AT knollmiriama currentsocialmediauseamongradiationoncologytrainees AT liretteseth currentsocialmediauseamongradiationoncologytrainees AT yechieliraphael currentsocialmediauseamongradiationoncologytrainees AT gerbernaamitk currentsocialmediauseamongradiationoncologytrainees AT jagsireshma currentsocialmediauseamongradiationoncologytrainees AT katzmatthews currentsocialmediauseamongradiationoncologytrainees |