Cargando…

Current Social Media Use Among Radiation Oncology Trainees

PURPOSE: Resident physicians use social media (SM) for many reasons. We sought to characterize current SM use by radiation oncology (RO) trainees for education and professional development. METHODS AND MATERIALS: An anonymous 40-question survey was sent by e-mail to RO residents in the 2018 to 2019...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Albert, Ashley, Kahn, Jenna M., Knoll, Miriam A., Lirette, Seth, Yechieli, Raphael, Gerber, Naamit K., Jagsi, Reshma, Katz, Matthew S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8022140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33851064
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2020.100642
_version_ 1783674883527409664
author Albert, Ashley
Kahn, Jenna M.
Knoll, Miriam A.
Lirette, Seth
Yechieli, Raphael
Gerber, Naamit K.
Jagsi, Reshma
Katz, Matthew S.
author_facet Albert, Ashley
Kahn, Jenna M.
Knoll, Miriam A.
Lirette, Seth
Yechieli, Raphael
Gerber, Naamit K.
Jagsi, Reshma
Katz, Matthew S.
author_sort Albert, Ashley
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Resident physicians use social media (SM) for many reasons. We sought to characterize current SM use by radiation oncology (RO) trainees for education and professional development. METHODS AND MATERIALS: An anonymous 40-question survey was sent by e-mail to RO residents in the 2018 to 2019 academic year. SM platform use, time spent on SM, professional use, and opinions regarding SM use were assessed. Descriptive statistics and a univariate logistic regression analysis were performed to identify factors associated with perceptions of SM and spending >25% of SM time for academic or professional purposes. RESULTS: Of the 615 residents surveyed, 149 responded (24% response rate). Facebook (73%), theMednet (62%), Instagram (59%), Twitter (57%), and Doximity (50%) were the top SM platforms used. Most respondents (53%) reported <25% of overall SM time on professional/academic purposes, and 21% reported using SM >60 minutes per day over the past week. Residents with an RO mentor on SM (n = 35; 24%; odds ratio [OR]: 2.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29-6.08; P = .010), those participating in RO discussions on SM (n = 71; 48%; OR: 2.85; 95% CI, 1.42-5.72; P = .003), and those interacting with professional societies (n = 69; 46%; OR: 7.11; 95% CI, 3.32-15.24; P < .001) were more likely to spend >25% of their SM time on professional/academic purposes. The vast majority of respondents agreed that SM exposed them to novel educational content (82%) and was helpful for career development (65%). In addition, 69% agreed that SM can improve clinical skills and knowledge. A substantial minority agreed that SM distracts them from studying (38%) or they felt pressure to have a SM presence (29%). CONCLUSIONS: Most RO residents reported that SM provides novel educational content and can help with career development. Potential disadvantages of SM for trainees may include distraction and pressure to maintain a SM presence. SM use by RO trainees merits further research to optimize its potential for education and professional development.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8022140
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80221402021-04-12 Current Social Media Use Among Radiation Oncology Trainees Albert, Ashley Kahn, Jenna M. Knoll, Miriam A. Lirette, Seth Yechieli, Raphael Gerber, Naamit K. Jagsi, Reshma Katz, Matthew S. Adv Radiat Oncol Scientific Article PURPOSE: Resident physicians use social media (SM) for many reasons. We sought to characterize current SM use by radiation oncology (RO) trainees for education and professional development. METHODS AND MATERIALS: An anonymous 40-question survey was sent by e-mail to RO residents in the 2018 to 2019 academic year. SM platform use, time spent on SM, professional use, and opinions regarding SM use were assessed. Descriptive statistics and a univariate logistic regression analysis were performed to identify factors associated with perceptions of SM and spending >25% of SM time for academic or professional purposes. RESULTS: Of the 615 residents surveyed, 149 responded (24% response rate). Facebook (73%), theMednet (62%), Instagram (59%), Twitter (57%), and Doximity (50%) were the top SM platforms used. Most respondents (53%) reported <25% of overall SM time on professional/academic purposes, and 21% reported using SM >60 minutes per day over the past week. Residents with an RO mentor on SM (n = 35; 24%; odds ratio [OR]: 2.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29-6.08; P = .010), those participating in RO discussions on SM (n = 71; 48%; OR: 2.85; 95% CI, 1.42-5.72; P = .003), and those interacting with professional societies (n = 69; 46%; OR: 7.11; 95% CI, 3.32-15.24; P < .001) were more likely to spend >25% of their SM time on professional/academic purposes. The vast majority of respondents agreed that SM exposed them to novel educational content (82%) and was helpful for career development (65%). In addition, 69% agreed that SM can improve clinical skills and knowledge. A substantial minority agreed that SM distracts them from studying (38%) or they felt pressure to have a SM presence (29%). CONCLUSIONS: Most RO residents reported that SM provides novel educational content and can help with career development. Potential disadvantages of SM for trainees may include distraction and pressure to maintain a SM presence. SM use by RO trainees merits further research to optimize its potential for education and professional development. Elsevier 2020-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8022140/ /pubmed/33851064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2020.100642 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Scientific Article
Albert, Ashley
Kahn, Jenna M.
Knoll, Miriam A.
Lirette, Seth
Yechieli, Raphael
Gerber, Naamit K.
Jagsi, Reshma
Katz, Matthew S.
Current Social Media Use Among Radiation Oncology Trainees
title Current Social Media Use Among Radiation Oncology Trainees
title_full Current Social Media Use Among Radiation Oncology Trainees
title_fullStr Current Social Media Use Among Radiation Oncology Trainees
title_full_unstemmed Current Social Media Use Among Radiation Oncology Trainees
title_short Current Social Media Use Among Radiation Oncology Trainees
title_sort current social media use among radiation oncology trainees
topic Scientific Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8022140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33851064
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2020.100642
work_keys_str_mv AT albertashley currentsocialmediauseamongradiationoncologytrainees
AT kahnjennam currentsocialmediauseamongradiationoncologytrainees
AT knollmiriama currentsocialmediauseamongradiationoncologytrainees
AT liretteseth currentsocialmediauseamongradiationoncologytrainees
AT yechieliraphael currentsocialmediauseamongradiationoncologytrainees
AT gerbernaamitk currentsocialmediauseamongradiationoncologytrainees
AT jagsireshma currentsocialmediauseamongradiationoncologytrainees
AT katzmatthews currentsocialmediauseamongradiationoncologytrainees