Cargando…

Supporting deprescribing in hospitalised patients: formative usability testing of a computerised decision support tool

BACKGROUND: Despite growing evidence that deprescribing can improve clinical outcomes, quality of life and reduce the likelihood of adverse drug events, the practice is not widespread, particularly in hospital settings. Clinical risk assessment tools, like the Drug Burden Index (DBI), can help prior...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baysari, Melissa T., Duong, Mai H., Hooper, Patrick, Stockey-Bridge, Michaela, Awad, Selvana, Zheng, Wu Yi, Hilmer, Sarah N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8022373/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33820536
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-021-01484-z
_version_ 1783674915211182080
author Baysari, Melissa T.
Duong, Mai H.
Hooper, Patrick
Stockey-Bridge, Michaela
Awad, Selvana
Zheng, Wu Yi
Hilmer, Sarah N.
author_facet Baysari, Melissa T.
Duong, Mai H.
Hooper, Patrick
Stockey-Bridge, Michaela
Awad, Selvana
Zheng, Wu Yi
Hilmer, Sarah N.
author_sort Baysari, Melissa T.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite growing evidence that deprescribing can improve clinical outcomes, quality of life and reduce the likelihood of adverse drug events, the practice is not widespread, particularly in hospital settings. Clinical risk assessment tools, like the Drug Burden Index (DBI), can help prioritise patients for medication review and prioritise medications to deprescribe, but are not integrated within routine care. The aim of this study was to conduct formative usability testing of a computerised decision support (CDS) tool, based on DBI, to identify modifications required to the tool prior to trialling in practice. METHODS: Our CDS tool comprised a DBI MPage in the electronic medical record (clinical workspace) that facilitated review of a patient’s DBI and medication list, access to deprescribing resources, and the ability to deprescribe. Two rounds of scenario-based formative usability testing with think-aloud protocol were used. Seventeen end-users participated in the testing, including junior and senior doctors, and pharmacists. RESULTS: Participants expressed positive views about the DBI CDS tool but testing revealed a number of clear areas for improvement. These primarily related to terminology used (i.e. what is a DBI and how is it calculated?), and consistency of functionality and display. A key finding was that users wanted the CDS tool to look and function in a similar way to other decision support tools in the electronic medical record. Modifications were made to the CDS tool in response to user feedback. CONCLUSION: Usability testing proved extremely useful for identifying components of our CDS tool that were confusing, difficult to locate or to understand. We recommend usability testing be adopted prior to implementation of any digital health intervention. We hope our revised CDS tool equips clinicians with the knowledge and confidence to consider discontinuation of inappropriate medications in routine care of hospitalised patients. In the next phase of our project, we plan to pilot test the tool in practice to evaluate its uptake and effectiveness in supporting deprescribing in routine hospital care. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12911-021-01484-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8022373
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80223732021-04-07 Supporting deprescribing in hospitalised patients: formative usability testing of a computerised decision support tool Baysari, Melissa T. Duong, Mai H. Hooper, Patrick Stockey-Bridge, Michaela Awad, Selvana Zheng, Wu Yi Hilmer, Sarah N. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: Despite growing evidence that deprescribing can improve clinical outcomes, quality of life and reduce the likelihood of adverse drug events, the practice is not widespread, particularly in hospital settings. Clinical risk assessment tools, like the Drug Burden Index (DBI), can help prioritise patients for medication review and prioritise medications to deprescribe, but are not integrated within routine care. The aim of this study was to conduct formative usability testing of a computerised decision support (CDS) tool, based on DBI, to identify modifications required to the tool prior to trialling in practice. METHODS: Our CDS tool comprised a DBI MPage in the electronic medical record (clinical workspace) that facilitated review of a patient’s DBI and medication list, access to deprescribing resources, and the ability to deprescribe. Two rounds of scenario-based formative usability testing with think-aloud protocol were used. Seventeen end-users participated in the testing, including junior and senior doctors, and pharmacists. RESULTS: Participants expressed positive views about the DBI CDS tool but testing revealed a number of clear areas for improvement. These primarily related to terminology used (i.e. what is a DBI and how is it calculated?), and consistency of functionality and display. A key finding was that users wanted the CDS tool to look and function in a similar way to other decision support tools in the electronic medical record. Modifications were made to the CDS tool in response to user feedback. CONCLUSION: Usability testing proved extremely useful for identifying components of our CDS tool that were confusing, difficult to locate or to understand. We recommend usability testing be adopted prior to implementation of any digital health intervention. We hope our revised CDS tool equips clinicians with the knowledge and confidence to consider discontinuation of inappropriate medications in routine care of hospitalised patients. In the next phase of our project, we plan to pilot test the tool in practice to evaluate its uptake and effectiveness in supporting deprescribing in routine hospital care. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12911-021-01484-z. BioMed Central 2021-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8022373/ /pubmed/33820536 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-021-01484-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Baysari, Melissa T.
Duong, Mai H.
Hooper, Patrick
Stockey-Bridge, Michaela
Awad, Selvana
Zheng, Wu Yi
Hilmer, Sarah N.
Supporting deprescribing in hospitalised patients: formative usability testing of a computerised decision support tool
title Supporting deprescribing in hospitalised patients: formative usability testing of a computerised decision support tool
title_full Supporting deprescribing in hospitalised patients: formative usability testing of a computerised decision support tool
title_fullStr Supporting deprescribing in hospitalised patients: formative usability testing of a computerised decision support tool
title_full_unstemmed Supporting deprescribing in hospitalised patients: formative usability testing of a computerised decision support tool
title_short Supporting deprescribing in hospitalised patients: formative usability testing of a computerised decision support tool
title_sort supporting deprescribing in hospitalised patients: formative usability testing of a computerised decision support tool
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8022373/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33820536
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-021-01484-z
work_keys_str_mv AT baysarimelissat supportingdeprescribinginhospitalisedpatientsformativeusabilitytestingofacomputeriseddecisionsupporttool
AT duongmaih supportingdeprescribinginhospitalisedpatientsformativeusabilitytestingofacomputeriseddecisionsupporttool
AT hooperpatrick supportingdeprescribinginhospitalisedpatientsformativeusabilitytestingofacomputeriseddecisionsupporttool
AT stockeybridgemichaela supportingdeprescribinginhospitalisedpatientsformativeusabilitytestingofacomputeriseddecisionsupporttool
AT awadselvana supportingdeprescribinginhospitalisedpatientsformativeusabilitytestingofacomputeriseddecisionsupporttool
AT zhengwuyi supportingdeprescribinginhospitalisedpatientsformativeusabilitytestingofacomputeriseddecisionsupporttool
AT hilmersarahn supportingdeprescribinginhospitalisedpatientsformativeusabilitytestingofacomputeriseddecisionsupporttool