Commentary: Statistical Adhockeries Are No Criteria for Legal Decisions—The Case of the Expert Medical Report on the Assessment of Urine Specimens Collected Among Athletes Having Participated to the Vancouver and Sochi Winter Olympic Games

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Burnier, Michel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Sociology
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8022452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33871480
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2019.00085
_version_ 1783674930494177280
author Burnier, Michel
author_facet Burnier, Michel
author_sort Burnier, Michel
collection PubMed
description
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8022452
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80224522021-04-15 Commentary: Statistical Adhockeries Are No Criteria for Legal Decisions—The Case of the Expert Medical Report on the Assessment of Urine Specimens Collected Among Athletes Having Participated to the Vancouver and Sochi Winter Olympic Games Burnier, Michel Front Sociol Sociology Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8022452/ /pubmed/33871480 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2019.00085 Text en Copyright © 2019 Burnier. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Sociology
Burnier, Michel
Commentary: Statistical Adhockeries Are No Criteria for Legal Decisions—The Case of the Expert Medical Report on the Assessment of Urine Specimens Collected Among Athletes Having Participated to the Vancouver and Sochi Winter Olympic Games
title Commentary: Statistical Adhockeries Are No Criteria for Legal Decisions—The Case of the Expert Medical Report on the Assessment of Urine Specimens Collected Among Athletes Having Participated to the Vancouver and Sochi Winter Olympic Games
title_full Commentary: Statistical Adhockeries Are No Criteria for Legal Decisions—The Case of the Expert Medical Report on the Assessment of Urine Specimens Collected Among Athletes Having Participated to the Vancouver and Sochi Winter Olympic Games
title_fullStr Commentary: Statistical Adhockeries Are No Criteria for Legal Decisions—The Case of the Expert Medical Report on the Assessment of Urine Specimens Collected Among Athletes Having Participated to the Vancouver and Sochi Winter Olympic Games
title_full_unstemmed Commentary: Statistical Adhockeries Are No Criteria for Legal Decisions—The Case of the Expert Medical Report on the Assessment of Urine Specimens Collected Among Athletes Having Participated to the Vancouver and Sochi Winter Olympic Games
title_short Commentary: Statistical Adhockeries Are No Criteria for Legal Decisions—The Case of the Expert Medical Report on the Assessment of Urine Specimens Collected Among Athletes Having Participated to the Vancouver and Sochi Winter Olympic Games
title_sort commentary: statistical adhockeries are no criteria for legal decisions—the case of the expert medical report on the assessment of urine specimens collected among athletes having participated to the vancouver and sochi winter olympic games
topic Sociology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8022452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33871480
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2019.00085
work_keys_str_mv AT burniermichel commentarystatisticaladhockeriesarenocriteriaforlegaldecisionsthecaseoftheexpertmedicalreportontheassessmentofurinespecimenscollectedamongathleteshavingparticipatedtothevancouverandsochiwinterolympicgames

Ejemplares similares