Cargando…

Favorable intermediate risk prostate cancer with biopsy Gleason score of 6

BACKGROUND: To identify potential prognostic factors among patients with favorable intermediate risk prostate cancer with a biopsy Gleason score 6. METHODS: From 2003 to 2019, favorable intermediate risk patients who underwent radical prostatectomy were included in this study. All patients were eval...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oh, Jong Jin, Ahn, Hyungwoo, Hwang, Sung Il, Lee, Hak Jong, Choe, Gheeyoung, Lee, Sangchul, Lee, Hakmin, Byun, Seok-Soo, Hong, Sung Kyu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8022526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33820533
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-021-00827-2
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: To identify potential prognostic factors among patients with favorable intermediate risk prostate cancer with a biopsy Gleason score 6. METHODS: From 2003 to 2019, favorable intermediate risk patients who underwent radical prostatectomy were included in this study. All patients were evaluated preoperatively with MRI. Using PI-RADS scores, patients were divided into two groups, and clinic-pathological outcomes were compared. The impact of preoperative factors on significant pathologic Gleason score upgrading (≥ 4 + 3) and biochemical recurrence were assessed via multivariate analysis. Subgroup analysis was performed in patients with PI-RADS ≤ 2. RESULTS: Among the 239 patients, 116 (48.5%) were MRI-negative (PI-RADS ≤ 3) and 123 (51.5%) were MRI-positive (PI-RADS > 3). Six patients in the MRI-negative group (5.2%) were characterized as requiring significant pathologic Gleason score upgrading compared with 34 patients (27.6%) in the MRI-positive group (p < 0.001). PI-RADS score was shown to be a significant predictor of significant pathologic Gleason score upgrading (OR = 6.246, p < 0.001) and biochemical recurrence (HR = 2.595, p = 0.043). 10-years biochemical recurrence-free survival was estimated to be 84.4% and 72.6% in the MRI-negative and MRI-positive groups (p = 0.035). In the 79 patients with PI-RADS ≤ 2, tumor length in biopsy cores was identified as a significant predictor of pathologic Gleason score (OR = 11.336, p = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: Among the patients with favorable intermediate risk prostate cancer with a biopsy Gleason score 6, preoperative MRI was capable of predicting significant pathologic Gleason score upgrading and biochemical recurrence. Especially, the patients with PI-RADS ≤ 2 and low biopsy tumor length could be a potential candidate to active surveillance.