Cargando…

Flow diverting devices in acute ruptured blood blister aneurysms: a three centric retrospective study

BACKGROUND: Blood blister aneurysms (BBAs) are a rare tiny subset of intracranial aneurysms, located at the nonbranching site of an artery, representing a therapeutic challenge from both surgical and endovascular approach. Flow-diverting efficacy, by preserving flow through the parent artery, was ap...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Incandela, Francesca, Craparo, Giuseppe, Abrignani, Sergio, Tessitore, Agostino, Pitrone, Antonio, Caranci, Ferdinando, Arrichiello, Antonio, Paolucci, Aldo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mattioli 1885 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8023071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33245069
http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v91i10-S.10261
_version_ 1783675055688908800
author Incandela, Francesca
Craparo, Giuseppe
Abrignani, Sergio
Tessitore, Agostino
Pitrone, Antonio
Caranci, Ferdinando
Arrichiello, Antonio
Paolucci, Aldo
author_facet Incandela, Francesca
Craparo, Giuseppe
Abrignani, Sergio
Tessitore, Agostino
Pitrone, Antonio
Caranci, Ferdinando
Arrichiello, Antonio
Paolucci, Aldo
author_sort Incandela, Francesca
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Blood blister aneurysms (BBAs) are a rare tiny subset of intracranial aneurysms, located at the nonbranching site of an artery, representing a therapeutic challenge from both surgical and endovascular approach. Flow-diverting efficacy, by preserving flow through the parent artery, was approved for its use in unruptured cerebral aneurysms, but no consensus was reached on its use for BBAs ruptured in the acute setting. We report a multicenter experience of use of flow diversion in acute setting of ruptured BBA, to analyze the safety and efficacy of these devices. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 6 consecutive intracranial BBAs treated with flow diverter devices (FDD) between 2018 and 2020 at 3 italian institutions. Materials, therapy used, complications, clinical and radiographic outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS: We used different FDD, in all cases immediate change in contrast opacification at the end of the procedure was reported. Intraprocedural IIb/IIIa inhibitor agent was the major antiplatelet protocol administered. Any complications occurred. All patients showed complete BBA obliteration at 3 months follow-up. 5/6 patients achieved good clinical outcome (0–2 mRS) at 3 months, all of which were presented with low grade SAH (Hunt Hess I–III) and a lower Fisher grade. CONCLUSION: Our data support this endovascular technique as a safe and effective therapeutic modality for this pathology in the acute setting. (www.actabiomedica.it).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8023071
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Mattioli 1885
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80230712021-04-07 Flow diverting devices in acute ruptured blood blister aneurysms: a three centric retrospective study Incandela, Francesca Craparo, Giuseppe Abrignani, Sergio Tessitore, Agostino Pitrone, Antonio Caranci, Ferdinando Arrichiello, Antonio Paolucci, Aldo Acta Biomed Original Article BACKGROUND: Blood blister aneurysms (BBAs) are a rare tiny subset of intracranial aneurysms, located at the nonbranching site of an artery, representing a therapeutic challenge from both surgical and endovascular approach. Flow-diverting efficacy, by preserving flow through the parent artery, was approved for its use in unruptured cerebral aneurysms, but no consensus was reached on its use for BBAs ruptured in the acute setting. We report a multicenter experience of use of flow diversion in acute setting of ruptured BBA, to analyze the safety and efficacy of these devices. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 6 consecutive intracranial BBAs treated with flow diverter devices (FDD) between 2018 and 2020 at 3 italian institutions. Materials, therapy used, complications, clinical and radiographic outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS: We used different FDD, in all cases immediate change in contrast opacification at the end of the procedure was reported. Intraprocedural IIb/IIIa inhibitor agent was the major antiplatelet protocol administered. Any complications occurred. All patients showed complete BBA obliteration at 3 months follow-up. 5/6 patients achieved good clinical outcome (0–2 mRS) at 3 months, all of which were presented with low grade SAH (Hunt Hess I–III) and a lower Fisher grade. CONCLUSION: Our data support this endovascular technique as a safe and effective therapeutic modality for this pathology in the acute setting. (www.actabiomedica.it). Mattioli 1885 2020 2020-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8023071/ /pubmed/33245069 http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v91i10-S.10261 Text en Copyright: © 2020 ACTA BIO MEDICA SOCIETY OF MEDICINE AND NATURAL SCIENCES OF PARMA http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
spellingShingle Original Article
Incandela, Francesca
Craparo, Giuseppe
Abrignani, Sergio
Tessitore, Agostino
Pitrone, Antonio
Caranci, Ferdinando
Arrichiello, Antonio
Paolucci, Aldo
Flow diverting devices in acute ruptured blood blister aneurysms: a three centric retrospective study
title Flow diverting devices in acute ruptured blood blister aneurysms: a three centric retrospective study
title_full Flow diverting devices in acute ruptured blood blister aneurysms: a three centric retrospective study
title_fullStr Flow diverting devices in acute ruptured blood blister aneurysms: a three centric retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Flow diverting devices in acute ruptured blood blister aneurysms: a three centric retrospective study
title_short Flow diverting devices in acute ruptured blood blister aneurysms: a three centric retrospective study
title_sort flow diverting devices in acute ruptured blood blister aneurysms: a three centric retrospective study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8023071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33245069
http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v91i10-S.10261
work_keys_str_mv AT incandelafrancesca flowdivertingdevicesinacuterupturedbloodblisteraneurysmsathreecentricretrospectivestudy
AT craparogiuseppe flowdivertingdevicesinacuterupturedbloodblisteraneurysmsathreecentricretrospectivestudy
AT abrignanisergio flowdivertingdevicesinacuterupturedbloodblisteraneurysmsathreecentricretrospectivestudy
AT tessitoreagostino flowdivertingdevicesinacuterupturedbloodblisteraneurysmsathreecentricretrospectivestudy
AT pitroneantonio flowdivertingdevicesinacuterupturedbloodblisteraneurysmsathreecentricretrospectivestudy
AT caranciferdinando flowdivertingdevicesinacuterupturedbloodblisteraneurysmsathreecentricretrospectivestudy
AT arrichielloantonio flowdivertingdevicesinacuterupturedbloodblisteraneurysmsathreecentricretrospectivestudy
AT paoluccialdo flowdivertingdevicesinacuterupturedbloodblisteraneurysmsathreecentricretrospectivestudy