Cargando…

Characteristics, management and outcomes of atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome in kidney transplant patients: a retrospective national study

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplantation (KTx) is a strong trigger for the development of either recurrent or de novo atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome (aHUS). According to previous studies, eculizumab (ECU) is effective for prophylaxis and for treatment of recurrence. METHODS: We evaluated the experie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Portoles, José, Huerta, Ana, Arjona, Emilia, Gavela, Eva, Agüera, Marisa, Jiménez, Carlos, Cavero, Teresa, Marrero, Domingo, Rodríguez de Córdoba, Santiago, Diekmann, Fritz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8023214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33841863
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfaa096
_version_ 1783675087451324416
author Portoles, José
Huerta, Ana
Arjona, Emilia
Gavela, Eva
Agüera, Marisa
Jiménez, Carlos
Cavero, Teresa
Marrero, Domingo
Rodríguez de Córdoba, Santiago
Diekmann, Fritz
author_facet Portoles, José
Huerta, Ana
Arjona, Emilia
Gavela, Eva
Agüera, Marisa
Jiménez, Carlos
Cavero, Teresa
Marrero, Domingo
Rodríguez de Córdoba, Santiago
Diekmann, Fritz
author_sort Portoles, José
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Kidney transplantation (KTx) is a strong trigger for the development of either recurrent or de novo atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome (aHUS). According to previous studies, eculizumab (ECU) is effective for prophylaxis and for treatment of recurrence. METHODS: We evaluated the experiences of Spanish patients with recurrent and de novo aHUS associated with KTx, treated or not treated with ECU. In the de novo group, we classified patients as having early de novo (during the first month) or late de novo aHUS (subsequent onset). RESULTS: We analysed 36 cases of aHUS associated with KTx. All of the 14 patients with pre-KTx diagnosis of aHUS were considered to have high or moderate risk of recurrence. Despite receiving grafts from suboptimal donors, prophylactic ECU was effective for avoiding recurrence. The drug was stopped only in two cases with low–moderate risk of recurrence and was maintained in high-risk patients with no single relapse. There were 22 de novo aHUS cases and 16 belonged to the early de novo group. The median time of onset in the late group was 3.4 years. The early group had a better response to ECU than the late group, probably due to earlier diagnosis and use of the drug. No genetic pathogenic variant was detected in de novo aHUS cases, suggesting a secondary profile of the disease. ECU was stopped in all de novo patients with no relapses. ECU was well tolerated in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: Both groups (pre-aHUS and de novo) presented different clinical profiles, management approaches and outcomes. One should consider aHUS regardless of time after KTx. Genetic studies are crucial to stratify risks of relapse and to determine necessary lengths of treatment. We suggest short ECU treatment for de novo cases without pathogenic mutation and that ECU treatment be considered pre-emptively for patients with moderate or high risk of recurrence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8023214
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80232142021-04-09 Characteristics, management and outcomes of atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome in kidney transplant patients: a retrospective national study Portoles, José Huerta, Ana Arjona, Emilia Gavela, Eva Agüera, Marisa Jiménez, Carlos Cavero, Teresa Marrero, Domingo Rodríguez de Córdoba, Santiago Diekmann, Fritz Clin Kidney J Original Articles BACKGROUND: Kidney transplantation (KTx) is a strong trigger for the development of either recurrent or de novo atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome (aHUS). According to previous studies, eculizumab (ECU) is effective for prophylaxis and for treatment of recurrence. METHODS: We evaluated the experiences of Spanish patients with recurrent and de novo aHUS associated with KTx, treated or not treated with ECU. In the de novo group, we classified patients as having early de novo (during the first month) or late de novo aHUS (subsequent onset). RESULTS: We analysed 36 cases of aHUS associated with KTx. All of the 14 patients with pre-KTx diagnosis of aHUS were considered to have high or moderate risk of recurrence. Despite receiving grafts from suboptimal donors, prophylactic ECU was effective for avoiding recurrence. The drug was stopped only in two cases with low–moderate risk of recurrence and was maintained in high-risk patients with no single relapse. There were 22 de novo aHUS cases and 16 belonged to the early de novo group. The median time of onset in the late group was 3.4 years. The early group had a better response to ECU than the late group, probably due to earlier diagnosis and use of the drug. No genetic pathogenic variant was detected in de novo aHUS cases, suggesting a secondary profile of the disease. ECU was stopped in all de novo patients with no relapses. ECU was well tolerated in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: Both groups (pre-aHUS and de novo) presented different clinical profiles, management approaches and outcomes. One should consider aHUS regardless of time after KTx. Genetic studies are crucial to stratify risks of relapse and to determine necessary lengths of treatment. We suggest short ECU treatment for de novo cases without pathogenic mutation and that ECU treatment be considered pre-emptively for patients with moderate or high risk of recurrence. Oxford University Press 2020-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8023214/ /pubmed/33841863 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfaa096 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Articles
Portoles, José
Huerta, Ana
Arjona, Emilia
Gavela, Eva
Agüera, Marisa
Jiménez, Carlos
Cavero, Teresa
Marrero, Domingo
Rodríguez de Córdoba, Santiago
Diekmann, Fritz
Characteristics, management and outcomes of atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome in kidney transplant patients: a retrospective national study
title Characteristics, management and outcomes of atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome in kidney transplant patients: a retrospective national study
title_full Characteristics, management and outcomes of atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome in kidney transplant patients: a retrospective national study
title_fullStr Characteristics, management and outcomes of atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome in kidney transplant patients: a retrospective national study
title_full_unstemmed Characteristics, management and outcomes of atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome in kidney transplant patients: a retrospective national study
title_short Characteristics, management and outcomes of atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome in kidney transplant patients: a retrospective national study
title_sort characteristics, management and outcomes of atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome in kidney transplant patients: a retrospective national study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8023214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33841863
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfaa096
work_keys_str_mv AT portolesjose characteristicsmanagementandoutcomesofatypicalhaemolyticuraemicsyndromeinkidneytransplantpatientsaretrospectivenationalstudy
AT huertaana characteristicsmanagementandoutcomesofatypicalhaemolyticuraemicsyndromeinkidneytransplantpatientsaretrospectivenationalstudy
AT arjonaemilia characteristicsmanagementandoutcomesofatypicalhaemolyticuraemicsyndromeinkidneytransplantpatientsaretrospectivenationalstudy
AT gavelaeva characteristicsmanagementandoutcomesofatypicalhaemolyticuraemicsyndromeinkidneytransplantpatientsaretrospectivenationalstudy
AT agueramarisa characteristicsmanagementandoutcomesofatypicalhaemolyticuraemicsyndromeinkidneytransplantpatientsaretrospectivenationalstudy
AT jimenezcarlos characteristicsmanagementandoutcomesofatypicalhaemolyticuraemicsyndromeinkidneytransplantpatientsaretrospectivenationalstudy
AT caveroteresa characteristicsmanagementandoutcomesofatypicalhaemolyticuraemicsyndromeinkidneytransplantpatientsaretrospectivenationalstudy
AT marrerodomingo characteristicsmanagementandoutcomesofatypicalhaemolyticuraemicsyndromeinkidneytransplantpatientsaretrospectivenationalstudy
AT rodriguezdecordobasantiago characteristicsmanagementandoutcomesofatypicalhaemolyticuraemicsyndromeinkidneytransplantpatientsaretrospectivenationalstudy
AT diekmannfritz characteristicsmanagementandoutcomesofatypicalhaemolyticuraemicsyndromeinkidneytransplantpatientsaretrospectivenationalstudy
AT characteristicsmanagementandoutcomesofatypicalhaemolyticuraemicsyndromeinkidneytransplantpatientsaretrospectivenationalstudy