Cargando…

Major depressive disorder in detention officers

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with major depressive disorder (MDD) in detention officers. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included all detention officers from the largest prison complex in the state of Bahia, Brazil. A self-reported questionnaire collected sociodemographic, occupatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Santos, Sheila Nascimento, Santos, Kionna Oliveira Bernardes, Carvalho, Fernando Martins, Fernandes, Rita de Cássia Pereira
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8023319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33886950
http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2021055002507
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with major depressive disorder (MDD) in detention officers. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included all detention officers from the largest prison complex in the state of Bahia, Brazil. A self-reported questionnaire collected sociodemographic, occupational and health data. The outcome variable – MDD – was evaluated by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and classified by the cut-off point ≥ 10 method and the algorithm method. The association measure used was the prevalence ratio (PR). Following Cox multivariate regression, the variables were divided into two blocks: sociodemographic characteristics and work, in that order. Only variables with adjusted PR (PR(adj)) ≥ 1.30 were selected to compose the final models. RESULTS: The MDD prevalence by the cut-off point ≥ 10 (simple) and algorithm method in the 401 officers investigated was 18.8% and 9.3%, respectively. MDD prevalence by cut-off point ≥ 10 was higher in female officers (PR(adj) = 2.77), who suffered threat from factions (PR(adj) = 2.05), did not report institutional training for the position (PR(adj) = 1.38), stated that the environment and working conditions interfered in their physical health (PR(adj) = 3.51) and performed stress-generating activities (PR(adj) in increasing gradient). MDD prevalence by the algorithm method was higher in female agents (PR(adj) = 3.45), with tertiary education (PR(adj) = 1.71), who stated that the environment and working conditions interfered in their physical health (PR(adj) = 6.33), suffered threat from factions (PR(adj) = 2.14), did not report institutional training (PR(adj) = 1.50) and have frequent contact with inmates at work (PR(adj) = 1.48). CONCLUSION: The high MDD prevalence in these detention officers was associated with sociodemographic factors and, especially, aspects of their work.