Cargando…
Negative density-dependent dispersal in tsetse (Glossina spp): An artefact of inappropriate analysis
Published analysis of genetic material from field-collected tsetse (Glossina spp, primarily from the Palpalis group) has been used to predict that the distance (δ) dispersed per generation increases as effective population densities (D(e)) decrease, displaying negative density-dependent dispersal (N...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8023489/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33764969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009026 |
_version_ | 1783675124389511168 |
---|---|
author | Hargrove, John W. Van Sickle, John Vale, Glyn A. Lucas, Eric R. |
author_facet | Hargrove, John W. Van Sickle, John Vale, Glyn A. Lucas, Eric R. |
author_sort | Hargrove, John W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Published analysis of genetic material from field-collected tsetse (Glossina spp, primarily from the Palpalis group) has been used to predict that the distance (δ) dispersed per generation increases as effective population densities (D(e)) decrease, displaying negative density-dependent dispersal (NDDD). Using the published data we show this result is an artefact arising primarily from errors in estimates of S, the area occupied by a subpopulation, and thereby in D(e). The errors arise from the assumption that S can be estimated as the area ([Image: see text] ) regarded as being covered by traps. We use modelling to show that such errors result in anomalously high correlations between [Image: see text] and [Image: see text] and the appearance of NDDD, with a slope of -0.5 for the regressions of log([Image: see text] ) on log([Image: see text] ), even in simulations where we specifically assume density-independent dispersal (DID). A complementary mathematical analysis confirms our findings. Modelling of field results shows, similarly, that the false signal of NDDD can be produced by varying trap deployment patterns. Errors in the estimates of δ in the published analysis were magnified because variation in estimates of S were greater than for all other variables measured, and accounted for the greatest proportion of variation in [Image: see text] . Errors in census population estimates result from an erroneous understanding of the relationship between trap placement and expected tsetse catch, exacerbated through failure to adjust for variations in trapping intensity, trap performance, and in capture probabilities between geographical situations and between tsetse species. Claims of support in the literature for NDDD are spurious. There is no suggested explanation for how NDDD might have evolved. We reject the NDDD hypothesis and caution that the idea should not be allowed to influence policy on tsetse and trypanosomiasis control. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8023489 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80234892021-04-15 Negative density-dependent dispersal in tsetse (Glossina spp): An artefact of inappropriate analysis Hargrove, John W. Van Sickle, John Vale, Glyn A. Lucas, Eric R. PLoS Negl Trop Dis Research Article Published analysis of genetic material from field-collected tsetse (Glossina spp, primarily from the Palpalis group) has been used to predict that the distance (δ) dispersed per generation increases as effective population densities (D(e)) decrease, displaying negative density-dependent dispersal (NDDD). Using the published data we show this result is an artefact arising primarily from errors in estimates of S, the area occupied by a subpopulation, and thereby in D(e). The errors arise from the assumption that S can be estimated as the area ([Image: see text] ) regarded as being covered by traps. We use modelling to show that such errors result in anomalously high correlations between [Image: see text] and [Image: see text] and the appearance of NDDD, with a slope of -0.5 for the regressions of log([Image: see text] ) on log([Image: see text] ), even in simulations where we specifically assume density-independent dispersal (DID). A complementary mathematical analysis confirms our findings. Modelling of field results shows, similarly, that the false signal of NDDD can be produced by varying trap deployment patterns. Errors in the estimates of δ in the published analysis were magnified because variation in estimates of S were greater than for all other variables measured, and accounted for the greatest proportion of variation in [Image: see text] . Errors in census population estimates result from an erroneous understanding of the relationship between trap placement and expected tsetse catch, exacerbated through failure to adjust for variations in trapping intensity, trap performance, and in capture probabilities between geographical situations and between tsetse species. Claims of support in the literature for NDDD are spurious. There is no suggested explanation for how NDDD might have evolved. We reject the NDDD hypothesis and caution that the idea should not be allowed to influence policy on tsetse and trypanosomiasis control. Public Library of Science 2021-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8023489/ /pubmed/33764969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009026 Text en © 2021 Hargrove et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hargrove, John W. Van Sickle, John Vale, Glyn A. Lucas, Eric R. Negative density-dependent dispersal in tsetse (Glossina spp): An artefact of inappropriate analysis |
title | Negative density-dependent dispersal in tsetse (Glossina spp): An artefact of inappropriate analysis |
title_full | Negative density-dependent dispersal in tsetse (Glossina spp): An artefact of inappropriate analysis |
title_fullStr | Negative density-dependent dispersal in tsetse (Glossina spp): An artefact of inappropriate analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Negative density-dependent dispersal in tsetse (Glossina spp): An artefact of inappropriate analysis |
title_short | Negative density-dependent dispersal in tsetse (Glossina spp): An artefact of inappropriate analysis |
title_sort | negative density-dependent dispersal in tsetse (glossina spp): an artefact of inappropriate analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8023489/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33764969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009026 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hargrovejohnw negativedensitydependentdispersalintsetseglossinasppanartefactofinappropriateanalysis AT vansicklejohn negativedensitydependentdispersalintsetseglossinasppanartefactofinappropriateanalysis AT valeglyna negativedensitydependentdispersalintsetseglossinasppanartefactofinappropriateanalysis AT lucasericr negativedensitydependentdispersalintsetseglossinasppanartefactofinappropriateanalysis |