Cargando…

Negative density-dependent dispersal in tsetse (Glossina spp): An artefact of inappropriate analysis

Published analysis of genetic material from field-collected tsetse (Glossina spp, primarily from the Palpalis group) has been used to predict that the distance (δ) dispersed per generation increases as effective population densities (D(e)) decrease, displaying negative density-dependent dispersal (N...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hargrove, John W., Van Sickle, John, Vale, Glyn A., Lucas, Eric R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8023489/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33764969
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009026
_version_ 1783675124389511168
author Hargrove, John W.
Van Sickle, John
Vale, Glyn A.
Lucas, Eric R.
author_facet Hargrove, John W.
Van Sickle, John
Vale, Glyn A.
Lucas, Eric R.
author_sort Hargrove, John W.
collection PubMed
description Published analysis of genetic material from field-collected tsetse (Glossina spp, primarily from the Palpalis group) has been used to predict that the distance (δ) dispersed per generation increases as effective population densities (D(e)) decrease, displaying negative density-dependent dispersal (NDDD). Using the published data we show this result is an artefact arising primarily from errors in estimates of S, the area occupied by a subpopulation, and thereby in D(e). The errors arise from the assumption that S can be estimated as the area ([Image: see text] ) regarded as being covered by traps. We use modelling to show that such errors result in anomalously high correlations between [Image: see text] and [Image: see text] and the appearance of NDDD, with a slope of -0.5 for the regressions of log([Image: see text] ) on log([Image: see text] ), even in simulations where we specifically assume density-independent dispersal (DID). A complementary mathematical analysis confirms our findings. Modelling of field results shows, similarly, that the false signal of NDDD can be produced by varying trap deployment patterns. Errors in the estimates of δ in the published analysis were magnified because variation in estimates of S were greater than for all other variables measured, and accounted for the greatest proportion of variation in [Image: see text] . Errors in census population estimates result from an erroneous understanding of the relationship between trap placement and expected tsetse catch, exacerbated through failure to adjust for variations in trapping intensity, trap performance, and in capture probabilities between geographical situations and between tsetse species. Claims of support in the literature for NDDD are spurious. There is no suggested explanation for how NDDD might have evolved. We reject the NDDD hypothesis and caution that the idea should not be allowed to influence policy on tsetse and trypanosomiasis control.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8023489
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80234892021-04-15 Negative density-dependent dispersal in tsetse (Glossina spp): An artefact of inappropriate analysis Hargrove, John W. Van Sickle, John Vale, Glyn A. Lucas, Eric R. PLoS Negl Trop Dis Research Article Published analysis of genetic material from field-collected tsetse (Glossina spp, primarily from the Palpalis group) has been used to predict that the distance (δ) dispersed per generation increases as effective population densities (D(e)) decrease, displaying negative density-dependent dispersal (NDDD). Using the published data we show this result is an artefact arising primarily from errors in estimates of S, the area occupied by a subpopulation, and thereby in D(e). The errors arise from the assumption that S can be estimated as the area ([Image: see text] ) regarded as being covered by traps. We use modelling to show that such errors result in anomalously high correlations between [Image: see text] and [Image: see text] and the appearance of NDDD, with a slope of -0.5 for the regressions of log([Image: see text] ) on log([Image: see text] ), even in simulations where we specifically assume density-independent dispersal (DID). A complementary mathematical analysis confirms our findings. Modelling of field results shows, similarly, that the false signal of NDDD can be produced by varying trap deployment patterns. Errors in the estimates of δ in the published analysis were magnified because variation in estimates of S were greater than for all other variables measured, and accounted for the greatest proportion of variation in [Image: see text] . Errors in census population estimates result from an erroneous understanding of the relationship between trap placement and expected tsetse catch, exacerbated through failure to adjust for variations in trapping intensity, trap performance, and in capture probabilities between geographical situations and between tsetse species. Claims of support in the literature for NDDD are spurious. There is no suggested explanation for how NDDD might have evolved. We reject the NDDD hypothesis and caution that the idea should not be allowed to influence policy on tsetse and trypanosomiasis control. Public Library of Science 2021-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8023489/ /pubmed/33764969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009026 Text en © 2021 Hargrove et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hargrove, John W.
Van Sickle, John
Vale, Glyn A.
Lucas, Eric R.
Negative density-dependent dispersal in tsetse (Glossina spp): An artefact of inappropriate analysis
title Negative density-dependent dispersal in tsetse (Glossina spp): An artefact of inappropriate analysis
title_full Negative density-dependent dispersal in tsetse (Glossina spp): An artefact of inappropriate analysis
title_fullStr Negative density-dependent dispersal in tsetse (Glossina spp): An artefact of inappropriate analysis
title_full_unstemmed Negative density-dependent dispersal in tsetse (Glossina spp): An artefact of inappropriate analysis
title_short Negative density-dependent dispersal in tsetse (Glossina spp): An artefact of inappropriate analysis
title_sort negative density-dependent dispersal in tsetse (glossina spp): an artefact of inappropriate analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8023489/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33764969
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009026
work_keys_str_mv AT hargrovejohnw negativedensitydependentdispersalintsetseglossinasppanartefactofinappropriateanalysis
AT vansicklejohn negativedensitydependentdispersalintsetseglossinasppanartefactofinappropriateanalysis
AT valeglyna negativedensitydependentdispersalintsetseglossinasppanartefactofinappropriateanalysis
AT lucasericr negativedensitydependentdispersalintsetseglossinasppanartefactofinappropriateanalysis