Cargando…

ATP–Magnesium Coordination: Protein Structure-Based Force Field Evaluation and Corrections

[Image: see text] In the numerous molecular recognition and catalytic processes across biochemistry involving adenosine triphosphate (ATP), the common bioactive form is its magnesium chelate, ATP·Mg(2+). In aqueous solution, two chelation geometries predominate, distinguished by bidentate and triden...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buelens, Floris P., Leonov, Hadas, de Groot, Bert L., Grubmüller, Helmut
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2021
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8023659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33616388
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.0c01205
_version_ 1783675154980667392
author Buelens, Floris P.
Leonov, Hadas
de Groot, Bert L.
Grubmüller, Helmut
author_facet Buelens, Floris P.
Leonov, Hadas
de Groot, Bert L.
Grubmüller, Helmut
author_sort Buelens, Floris P.
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] In the numerous molecular recognition and catalytic processes across biochemistry involving adenosine triphosphate (ATP), the common bioactive form is its magnesium chelate, ATP·Mg(2+). In aqueous solution, two chelation geometries predominate, distinguished by bidentate and tridentate Mg(2+)–phosphate coordination. These are approximately isoenergetic but separated by a high energy barrier. Force field-based atomistic simulation studies of this complex require an accurate representation of its structure and energetics. Here we focused on the energetics of ATP·Mg(2+) coordination. Applying an enhanced sampling scheme to circumvent prohibitively slow sampling of transitions between coordination modes, we observed striking contradictions between Amber and CHARMM force field descriptions, most prominently in opposing predictions of the favored coordination mode. Through further configurational free energy calculations, conducted against a diverse set of ATP·Mg(2+)–protein complex structures to supplement otherwise limited experimental data, we quantified systematic biases for each force field. The force field calculations were strongly predictive of experimentally observed coordination modes, enabling additive corrections to the coordination free energy that deliver close agreement with experiment. We reassessed the applicability of the thus corrected force field descriptions of ATP·Mg(2+) for biomolecular simulation and observed that, while the CHARMM parameters display an erroneous preference for overextended triphosphate configurations that will affect many common biomolecular simulation applications involving ATP, the force field energy landscapes broadly agree with experimental measurements of solution geometry and the distribution of ATP·Mg(2+) structures found in the Protein Data Bank. Our force field evaluation and correction approach, based on maximizing consistency with the large and heterogeneous collection of structural information encoded in the PDB, should be broadly applicable to many other systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8023659
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80236592021-04-07 ATP–Magnesium Coordination: Protein Structure-Based Force Field Evaluation and Corrections Buelens, Floris P. Leonov, Hadas de Groot, Bert L. Grubmüller, Helmut J Chem Theory Comput [Image: see text] In the numerous molecular recognition and catalytic processes across biochemistry involving adenosine triphosphate (ATP), the common bioactive form is its magnesium chelate, ATP·Mg(2+). In aqueous solution, two chelation geometries predominate, distinguished by bidentate and tridentate Mg(2+)–phosphate coordination. These are approximately isoenergetic but separated by a high energy barrier. Force field-based atomistic simulation studies of this complex require an accurate representation of its structure and energetics. Here we focused on the energetics of ATP·Mg(2+) coordination. Applying an enhanced sampling scheme to circumvent prohibitively slow sampling of transitions between coordination modes, we observed striking contradictions between Amber and CHARMM force field descriptions, most prominently in opposing predictions of the favored coordination mode. Through further configurational free energy calculations, conducted against a diverse set of ATP·Mg(2+)–protein complex structures to supplement otherwise limited experimental data, we quantified systematic biases for each force field. The force field calculations were strongly predictive of experimentally observed coordination modes, enabling additive corrections to the coordination free energy that deliver close agreement with experiment. We reassessed the applicability of the thus corrected force field descriptions of ATP·Mg(2+) for biomolecular simulation and observed that, while the CHARMM parameters display an erroneous preference for overextended triphosphate configurations that will affect many common biomolecular simulation applications involving ATP, the force field energy landscapes broadly agree with experimental measurements of solution geometry and the distribution of ATP·Mg(2+) structures found in the Protein Data Bank. Our force field evaluation and correction approach, based on maximizing consistency with the large and heterogeneous collection of structural information encoded in the PDB, should be broadly applicable to many other systems. American Chemical Society 2021-02-22 2021-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8023659/ /pubmed/33616388 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.0c01205 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Buelens, Floris P.
Leonov, Hadas
de Groot, Bert L.
Grubmüller, Helmut
ATP–Magnesium Coordination: Protein Structure-Based Force Field Evaluation and Corrections
title ATP–Magnesium Coordination: Protein Structure-Based Force Field Evaluation and Corrections
title_full ATP–Magnesium Coordination: Protein Structure-Based Force Field Evaluation and Corrections
title_fullStr ATP–Magnesium Coordination: Protein Structure-Based Force Field Evaluation and Corrections
title_full_unstemmed ATP–Magnesium Coordination: Protein Structure-Based Force Field Evaluation and Corrections
title_short ATP–Magnesium Coordination: Protein Structure-Based Force Field Evaluation and Corrections
title_sort atp–magnesium coordination: protein structure-based force field evaluation and corrections
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8023659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33616388
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.0c01205
work_keys_str_mv AT buelensflorisp atpmagnesiumcoordinationproteinstructurebasedforcefieldevaluationandcorrections
AT leonovhadas atpmagnesiumcoordinationproteinstructurebasedforcefieldevaluationandcorrections
AT degrootbertl atpmagnesiumcoordinationproteinstructurebasedforcefieldevaluationandcorrections
AT grubmullerhelmut atpmagnesiumcoordinationproteinstructurebasedforcefieldevaluationandcorrections