Cargando…
Stakeholder perceptions of current practices and challenges in priority setting for non-communicable disease control in Kenya: a qualitative study
OBJECTIVE: To explore the stakeholders’ perceptions of current practices and challenges in priority setting for non-communicable disease (NCD) control in Kenya. DESIGN: A qualitative study approach conducted within a 1-day stakeholder workshop that followed a deliberative dialogue process. SETTING:...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8023733/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33795302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043641 |
_version_ | 1783675169305264128 |
---|---|
author | Wanjau, Mary Njeri Kivuti-Bitok, Lucy W. Aminde, Leopold Ndemnge Veerman, Lennert |
author_facet | Wanjau, Mary Njeri Kivuti-Bitok, Lucy W. Aminde, Leopold Ndemnge Veerman, Lennert |
author_sort | Wanjau, Mary Njeri |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To explore the stakeholders’ perceptions of current practices and challenges in priority setting for non-communicable disease (NCD) control in Kenya. DESIGN: A qualitative study approach conducted within a 1-day stakeholder workshop that followed a deliberative dialogue process. SETTING: Study was conducted within a 1-day stakeholder workshop that was held in October 2019 in Nairobi, Kenya. PARTICIPANTS: Stakeholders who currently participate in the national level policymaking process for health in Kenya. OUTCOME MEASURE: Priority setting process for NCD control in Kenya. RESULTS: Donor funding was identified as a key factor that informed the priority setting process for NCD control. Misalignment between donors’ priorities and the country’s priorities for NCD control was seen as a hindrance to the process. It was identified that there was minimal utilisation of context-specific evidence from locally conducted research. Additional factors seen to inform the priority setting process included political leadership, government policies and budget allocation for NCDs, stakeholder engagement, media, people’s cultural and religious beliefs. CONCLUSION: There is an urgent need for development aid partners to align their priorities to the specific NCD control priority areas that exist in the countries that they extend aid to. Additionally, context-specific scientific evidence on effective local interventions for NCD control is required to inform areas of priority in Kenya and other low-income and middle-income countries. Further research is needed to develop best practice guidelines and tools for the creation of national-level priority setting frameworks that are responsive to the identified factors that inform the priority setting process for NCD control. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8023733 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80237332021-04-21 Stakeholder perceptions of current practices and challenges in priority setting for non-communicable disease control in Kenya: a qualitative study Wanjau, Mary Njeri Kivuti-Bitok, Lucy W. Aminde, Leopold Ndemnge Veerman, Lennert BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVE: To explore the stakeholders’ perceptions of current practices and challenges in priority setting for non-communicable disease (NCD) control in Kenya. DESIGN: A qualitative study approach conducted within a 1-day stakeholder workshop that followed a deliberative dialogue process. SETTING: Study was conducted within a 1-day stakeholder workshop that was held in October 2019 in Nairobi, Kenya. PARTICIPANTS: Stakeholders who currently participate in the national level policymaking process for health in Kenya. OUTCOME MEASURE: Priority setting process for NCD control in Kenya. RESULTS: Donor funding was identified as a key factor that informed the priority setting process for NCD control. Misalignment between donors’ priorities and the country’s priorities for NCD control was seen as a hindrance to the process. It was identified that there was minimal utilisation of context-specific evidence from locally conducted research. Additional factors seen to inform the priority setting process included political leadership, government policies and budget allocation for NCDs, stakeholder engagement, media, people’s cultural and religious beliefs. CONCLUSION: There is an urgent need for development aid partners to align their priorities to the specific NCD control priority areas that exist in the countries that they extend aid to. Additionally, context-specific scientific evidence on effective local interventions for NCD control is required to inform areas of priority in Kenya and other low-income and middle-income countries. Further research is needed to develop best practice guidelines and tools for the creation of national-level priority setting frameworks that are responsive to the identified factors that inform the priority setting process for NCD control. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8023733/ /pubmed/33795302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043641 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Public Health Wanjau, Mary Njeri Kivuti-Bitok, Lucy W. Aminde, Leopold Ndemnge Veerman, Lennert Stakeholder perceptions of current practices and challenges in priority setting for non-communicable disease control in Kenya: a qualitative study |
title | Stakeholder perceptions of current practices and challenges in priority setting for non-communicable disease control in Kenya: a qualitative study |
title_full | Stakeholder perceptions of current practices and challenges in priority setting for non-communicable disease control in Kenya: a qualitative study |
title_fullStr | Stakeholder perceptions of current practices and challenges in priority setting for non-communicable disease control in Kenya: a qualitative study |
title_full_unstemmed | Stakeholder perceptions of current practices and challenges in priority setting for non-communicable disease control in Kenya: a qualitative study |
title_short | Stakeholder perceptions of current practices and challenges in priority setting for non-communicable disease control in Kenya: a qualitative study |
title_sort | stakeholder perceptions of current practices and challenges in priority setting for non-communicable disease control in kenya: a qualitative study |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8023733/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33795302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043641 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wanjaumarynjeri stakeholderperceptionsofcurrentpracticesandchallengesinprioritysettingfornoncommunicablediseasecontrolinkenyaaqualitativestudy AT kivutibitoklucyw stakeholderperceptionsofcurrentpracticesandchallengesinprioritysettingfornoncommunicablediseasecontrolinkenyaaqualitativestudy AT amindeleopoldndemnge stakeholderperceptionsofcurrentpracticesandchallengesinprioritysettingfornoncommunicablediseasecontrolinkenyaaqualitativestudy AT veermanlennert stakeholderperceptionsofcurrentpracticesandchallengesinprioritysettingfornoncommunicablediseasecontrolinkenyaaqualitativestudy |