Cargando…

Does a surgical helmet provide protection against aerosol transmitted disease?

Background and purpose — The COVID-19 pandemic caused by infection with SARS-CoV-2 has led to a global shortage of personal protective equipment (PPE). Various alternatives to ordinary PPE have been suggested to reduce transmission, which is primarily through droplets and aerosols. For many years or...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Temmesfeld, Max Joachim, Jakobsen, Rune Bruhn, Grant, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8023883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32573285
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2020.1771525
_version_ 1783675193694093312
author Temmesfeld, Max Joachim
Jakobsen, Rune Bruhn
Grant, Peter
author_facet Temmesfeld, Max Joachim
Jakobsen, Rune Bruhn
Grant, Peter
author_sort Temmesfeld, Max Joachim
collection PubMed
description Background and purpose — The COVID-19 pandemic caused by infection with SARS-CoV-2 has led to a global shortage of personal protective equipment (PPE). Various alternatives to ordinary PPE have been suggested to reduce transmission, which is primarily through droplets and aerosols. For many years orthopedic surgeons have been using surgical helmets as personal protection against blood-borne pathogens during arthroplasty surgery. We have investigated the possibility of using the Stryker Flyte surgical helmet as a respiratory protective device against airborne- and droplet-transmitted disease, since the helmet shares many features with powered air-purifying respirators. Materials and methods — Using an aerosol particle generator, we determined the filtration capacity of the Stryker Flyte helmet by placing particle counters measuring the concentrations of 0.3, 0.5, and 5 µm particles inside and outside of the helmet. Results — We found that the helmet has insufficient capacity for filtrating aerosol particles, and, for 0.3 µm sized particles, we even recorded an accumulation of particles inside the helmet. Interpretation — We conclude that the Stryker Flyte surgical helmet should not be used as a respiratory protective device when there is a risk for exposure to aerosol containing SARS-CoV-2, the virus causing COVID-19, in accordance with the recommendation from the manufacturer
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8023883
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80238832021-04-22 Does a surgical helmet provide protection against aerosol transmitted disease? Temmesfeld, Max Joachim Jakobsen, Rune Bruhn Grant, Peter Acta Orthop Articles Background and purpose — The COVID-19 pandemic caused by infection with SARS-CoV-2 has led to a global shortage of personal protective equipment (PPE). Various alternatives to ordinary PPE have been suggested to reduce transmission, which is primarily through droplets and aerosols. For many years orthopedic surgeons have been using surgical helmets as personal protection against blood-borne pathogens during arthroplasty surgery. We have investigated the possibility of using the Stryker Flyte surgical helmet as a respiratory protective device against airborne- and droplet-transmitted disease, since the helmet shares many features with powered air-purifying respirators. Materials and methods — Using an aerosol particle generator, we determined the filtration capacity of the Stryker Flyte helmet by placing particle counters measuring the concentrations of 0.3, 0.5, and 5 µm particles inside and outside of the helmet. Results — We found that the helmet has insufficient capacity for filtrating aerosol particles, and, for 0.3 µm sized particles, we even recorded an accumulation of particles inside the helmet. Interpretation — We conclude that the Stryker Flyte surgical helmet should not be used as a respiratory protective device when there is a risk for exposure to aerosol containing SARS-CoV-2, the virus causing COVID-19, in accordance with the recommendation from the manufacturer Taylor & Francis 2020-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8023883/ /pubmed/32573285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2020.1771525 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis on behalf of the Nordic Orthopedic Federation http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Articles
Temmesfeld, Max Joachim
Jakobsen, Rune Bruhn
Grant, Peter
Does a surgical helmet provide protection against aerosol transmitted disease?
title Does a surgical helmet provide protection against aerosol transmitted disease?
title_full Does a surgical helmet provide protection against aerosol transmitted disease?
title_fullStr Does a surgical helmet provide protection against aerosol transmitted disease?
title_full_unstemmed Does a surgical helmet provide protection against aerosol transmitted disease?
title_short Does a surgical helmet provide protection against aerosol transmitted disease?
title_sort does a surgical helmet provide protection against aerosol transmitted disease?
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8023883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32573285
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2020.1771525
work_keys_str_mv AT temmesfeldmaxjoachim doesasurgicalhelmetprovideprotectionagainstaerosoltransmitteddisease
AT jakobsenrunebruhn doesasurgicalhelmetprovideprotectionagainstaerosoltransmitteddisease
AT grantpeter doesasurgicalhelmetprovideprotectionagainstaerosoltransmitteddisease