Cargando…
Does a surgical helmet provide protection against aerosol transmitted disease?
Background and purpose — The COVID-19 pandemic caused by infection with SARS-CoV-2 has led to a global shortage of personal protective equipment (PPE). Various alternatives to ordinary PPE have been suggested to reduce transmission, which is primarily through droplets and aerosols. For many years or...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8023883/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32573285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2020.1771525 |
_version_ | 1783675193694093312 |
---|---|
author | Temmesfeld, Max Joachim Jakobsen, Rune Bruhn Grant, Peter |
author_facet | Temmesfeld, Max Joachim Jakobsen, Rune Bruhn Grant, Peter |
author_sort | Temmesfeld, Max Joachim |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and purpose — The COVID-19 pandemic caused by infection with SARS-CoV-2 has led to a global shortage of personal protective equipment (PPE). Various alternatives to ordinary PPE have been suggested to reduce transmission, which is primarily through droplets and aerosols. For many years orthopedic surgeons have been using surgical helmets as personal protection against blood-borne pathogens during arthroplasty surgery. We have investigated the possibility of using the Stryker Flyte surgical helmet as a respiratory protective device against airborne- and droplet-transmitted disease, since the helmet shares many features with powered air-purifying respirators. Materials and methods — Using an aerosol particle generator, we determined the filtration capacity of the Stryker Flyte helmet by placing particle counters measuring the concentrations of 0.3, 0.5, and 5 µm particles inside and outside of the helmet. Results — We found that the helmet has insufficient capacity for filtrating aerosol particles, and, for 0.3 µm sized particles, we even recorded an accumulation of particles inside the helmet. Interpretation — We conclude that the Stryker Flyte surgical helmet should not be used as a respiratory protective device when there is a risk for exposure to aerosol containing SARS-CoV-2, the virus causing COVID-19, in accordance with the recommendation from the manufacturer |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8023883 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80238832021-04-22 Does a surgical helmet provide protection against aerosol transmitted disease? Temmesfeld, Max Joachim Jakobsen, Rune Bruhn Grant, Peter Acta Orthop Articles Background and purpose — The COVID-19 pandemic caused by infection with SARS-CoV-2 has led to a global shortage of personal protective equipment (PPE). Various alternatives to ordinary PPE have been suggested to reduce transmission, which is primarily through droplets and aerosols. For many years orthopedic surgeons have been using surgical helmets as personal protection against blood-borne pathogens during arthroplasty surgery. We have investigated the possibility of using the Stryker Flyte surgical helmet as a respiratory protective device against airborne- and droplet-transmitted disease, since the helmet shares many features with powered air-purifying respirators. Materials and methods — Using an aerosol particle generator, we determined the filtration capacity of the Stryker Flyte helmet by placing particle counters measuring the concentrations of 0.3, 0.5, and 5 µm particles inside and outside of the helmet. Results — We found that the helmet has insufficient capacity for filtrating aerosol particles, and, for 0.3 µm sized particles, we even recorded an accumulation of particles inside the helmet. Interpretation — We conclude that the Stryker Flyte surgical helmet should not be used as a respiratory protective device when there is a risk for exposure to aerosol containing SARS-CoV-2, the virus causing COVID-19, in accordance with the recommendation from the manufacturer Taylor & Francis 2020-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8023883/ /pubmed/32573285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2020.1771525 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis on behalf of the Nordic Orthopedic Federation http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Articles Temmesfeld, Max Joachim Jakobsen, Rune Bruhn Grant, Peter Does a surgical helmet provide protection against aerosol transmitted disease? |
title | Does a surgical helmet provide protection against aerosol transmitted disease? |
title_full | Does a surgical helmet provide protection against aerosol transmitted disease? |
title_fullStr | Does a surgical helmet provide protection against aerosol transmitted disease? |
title_full_unstemmed | Does a surgical helmet provide protection against aerosol transmitted disease? |
title_short | Does a surgical helmet provide protection against aerosol transmitted disease? |
title_sort | does a surgical helmet provide protection against aerosol transmitted disease? |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8023883/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32573285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2020.1771525 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT temmesfeldmaxjoachim doesasurgicalhelmetprovideprotectionagainstaerosoltransmitteddisease AT jakobsenrunebruhn doesasurgicalhelmetprovideprotectionagainstaerosoltransmitteddisease AT grantpeter doesasurgicalhelmetprovideprotectionagainstaerosoltransmitteddisease |