Cargando…

Tibial lengthening using a retrograde magnetically driven intramedullary lengthening device in 10 patients with preexisting ankle and hindfoot fusion

Background and purpose — Motorized intramedullary lengthening nails (ILNs) have been developed as an alternative to external fixators for long bone lengthening. The antegrade approach represents the standard method for tibial ILN insertion. In patients with preexisting ankle and hindfoot fusion a re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vogt, Bjoern, Roedl, Robert, Gosheger, Georg, Toporowski, Gregor, Laufer, Andrea, Theil, Christoph, Broeking, Jan Niklas, Frommer, Adrien
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8023964/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32835564
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2020.1807222
_version_ 1783675212957483008
author Vogt, Bjoern
Roedl, Robert
Gosheger, Georg
Toporowski, Gregor
Laufer, Andrea
Theil, Christoph
Broeking, Jan Niklas
Frommer, Adrien
author_facet Vogt, Bjoern
Roedl, Robert
Gosheger, Georg
Toporowski, Gregor
Laufer, Andrea
Theil, Christoph
Broeking, Jan Niklas
Frommer, Adrien
author_sort Vogt, Bjoern
collection PubMed
description Background and purpose — Motorized intramedullary lengthening nails (ILNs) have been developed as an alternative to external fixators for long bone lengthening. The antegrade approach represents the standard method for tibial ILN insertion. In patients with preexisting ankle and hindfoot fusion a retrograde approach provides an alternative technique that has not been evaluated so far. We report the outcome of this method in 10 patients. Patients and methods — This retrospective study included 10 patients (mean age 18 years [13–25]) with preexisting ankle and hindfoot fusion who underwent tibial lengthening with a retrograde ILN (PRECICE). The mean leg length discrepancy (LLD) was 58 mm (36–80). The underlying conditions were congenital (n = 9) and post tumor resection (n = 1). The main outcome measures were: ILN reliability, distraction achieved, distraction index (DIX), time to bone healing, consolidation index (CIX), complications, and functional results. Results — All patients achieved the goal of lengthening (mean 48 mm [26–80]). Average DIX was 0.6 mm/day (0.5–0.7) and mean CIX was 44 days/cm (26–60). Delayed consolidation occurred in 2 patients and healed after ILN dynamization or nail exchange with grafting. Toe contractures in 2 other patients were resolved with physiotherapy or tenotomy. Until last follow-up (mean 18 months [12–30]) no true complications were encountered, knee motion remained unaffected, and full osseous consolidation occurred in all patients. Interpretation — In patients with LLD and preexisting ankle and hindfoot fusion distal tibial lengthening using a retrograde ILN is a reliable alternative to the standard approach with equivalent bone healing potential and low complication rates leaving the knee unaffected.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8023964
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80239642021-04-22 Tibial lengthening using a retrograde magnetically driven intramedullary lengthening device in 10 patients with preexisting ankle and hindfoot fusion Vogt, Bjoern Roedl, Robert Gosheger, Georg Toporowski, Gregor Laufer, Andrea Theil, Christoph Broeking, Jan Niklas Frommer, Adrien Acta Orthop Research Article Background and purpose — Motorized intramedullary lengthening nails (ILNs) have been developed as an alternative to external fixators for long bone lengthening. The antegrade approach represents the standard method for tibial ILN insertion. In patients with preexisting ankle and hindfoot fusion a retrograde approach provides an alternative technique that has not been evaluated so far. We report the outcome of this method in 10 patients. Patients and methods — This retrospective study included 10 patients (mean age 18 years [13–25]) with preexisting ankle and hindfoot fusion who underwent tibial lengthening with a retrograde ILN (PRECICE). The mean leg length discrepancy (LLD) was 58 mm (36–80). The underlying conditions were congenital (n = 9) and post tumor resection (n = 1). The main outcome measures were: ILN reliability, distraction achieved, distraction index (DIX), time to bone healing, consolidation index (CIX), complications, and functional results. Results — All patients achieved the goal of lengthening (mean 48 mm [26–80]). Average DIX was 0.6 mm/day (0.5–0.7) and mean CIX was 44 days/cm (26–60). Delayed consolidation occurred in 2 patients and healed after ILN dynamization or nail exchange with grafting. Toe contractures in 2 other patients were resolved with physiotherapy or tenotomy. Until last follow-up (mean 18 months [12–30]) no true complications were encountered, knee motion remained unaffected, and full osseous consolidation occurred in all patients. Interpretation — In patients with LLD and preexisting ankle and hindfoot fusion distal tibial lengthening using a retrograde ILN is a reliable alternative to the standard approach with equivalent bone healing potential and low complication rates leaving the knee unaffected. Taylor & Francis 2020-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8023964/ /pubmed/32835564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2020.1807222 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis on behalf of the Nordic Orthopedic Federation. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vogt, Bjoern
Roedl, Robert
Gosheger, Georg
Toporowski, Gregor
Laufer, Andrea
Theil, Christoph
Broeking, Jan Niklas
Frommer, Adrien
Tibial lengthening using a retrograde magnetically driven intramedullary lengthening device in 10 patients with preexisting ankle and hindfoot fusion
title Tibial lengthening using a retrograde magnetically driven intramedullary lengthening device in 10 patients with preexisting ankle and hindfoot fusion
title_full Tibial lengthening using a retrograde magnetically driven intramedullary lengthening device in 10 patients with preexisting ankle and hindfoot fusion
title_fullStr Tibial lengthening using a retrograde magnetically driven intramedullary lengthening device in 10 patients with preexisting ankle and hindfoot fusion
title_full_unstemmed Tibial lengthening using a retrograde magnetically driven intramedullary lengthening device in 10 patients with preexisting ankle and hindfoot fusion
title_short Tibial lengthening using a retrograde magnetically driven intramedullary lengthening device in 10 patients with preexisting ankle and hindfoot fusion
title_sort tibial lengthening using a retrograde magnetically driven intramedullary lengthening device in 10 patients with preexisting ankle and hindfoot fusion
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8023964/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32835564
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2020.1807222
work_keys_str_mv AT vogtbjoern tibiallengtheningusingaretrogrademagneticallydrivenintramedullarylengtheningdevicein10patientswithpreexistingankleandhindfootfusion
AT roedlrobert tibiallengtheningusingaretrogrademagneticallydrivenintramedullarylengtheningdevicein10patientswithpreexistingankleandhindfootfusion
AT goshegergeorg tibiallengtheningusingaretrogrademagneticallydrivenintramedullarylengtheningdevicein10patientswithpreexistingankleandhindfootfusion
AT toporowskigregor tibiallengtheningusingaretrogrademagneticallydrivenintramedullarylengtheningdevicein10patientswithpreexistingankleandhindfootfusion
AT lauferandrea tibiallengtheningusingaretrogrademagneticallydrivenintramedullarylengtheningdevicein10patientswithpreexistingankleandhindfootfusion
AT theilchristoph tibiallengtheningusingaretrogrademagneticallydrivenintramedullarylengtheningdevicein10patientswithpreexistingankleandhindfootfusion
AT broekingjanniklas tibiallengtheningusingaretrogrademagneticallydrivenintramedullarylengtheningdevicein10patientswithpreexistingankleandhindfootfusion
AT frommeradrien tibiallengtheningusingaretrogrademagneticallydrivenintramedullarylengtheningdevicein10patientswithpreexistingankleandhindfootfusion