Cargando…

Sinus Node Dysfunction due to Occlusion of the Sinus Node Artery during Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

BACKGROUND: Sinus node artery occlusion (SNO) is a rare complication of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We analyze both the short- and long-term consequences of SNO. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 1379 consecutive PCI's involving RCA and Cx arteries performed in our heart instit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koren, Ofir, Antonelli, Dante, Khamaise, Ranya, Ehrenberg, Scott, Rozner, Ehud, Turgeman, Yoav
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8024099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33859544
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8810484
_version_ 1783675241762914304
author Koren, Ofir
Antonelli, Dante
Khamaise, Ranya
Ehrenberg, Scott
Rozner, Ehud
Turgeman, Yoav
author_facet Koren, Ofir
Antonelli, Dante
Khamaise, Ranya
Ehrenberg, Scott
Rozner, Ehud
Turgeman, Yoav
author_sort Koren, Ofir
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sinus node artery occlusion (SNO) is a rare complication of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We analyze both the short- and long-term consequences of SNO. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 1379 consecutive PCI's involving RCA and Cx arteries performed in our heart institute from 2016 to 2019. Median follow-up was 44 ± 5 months. RESULTS: Among the 4844 PCIs performed during the study period, 284 involved the RCA and the circumflex's proximal segment. Periprocedural SNO was estimated by angiography observed in 15 patients (5.3%), all originated from RCA. The majority of SNO occurred during urgent and primary PCIs following acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Sinus node dysfunction (SND) appeared in 12 (80%) of patients. Four (26.6%) patients had sinus bradycardia, which resolved spontaneously, and 8 (53.3%) patients had sinus arrest with an escaped nodal rhythm, which mostly responded to medical treatment during the first 24 hours. There was no association between PCI technique and outcome. Three patients (20%) required urgent temporary ventricular pacing. One patient had permanent pacemaker implantation. Pacemaker interrogation during follow-up revealed a recovery of the sinus node function after one month. CONCLUSION: SNO is rare and seen mostly during angioplasty to the proximal segment of the RCA during ACS. The risk of developing sinus node dysfunction following SNO is high. SND usually appears during the first 24 h of PCI. The majority of SND patients responded to medical treatment, and only in rare cases were permanent pacemakers required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8024099
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80240992021-04-14 Sinus Node Dysfunction due to Occlusion of the Sinus Node Artery during Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Koren, Ofir Antonelli, Dante Khamaise, Ranya Ehrenberg, Scott Rozner, Ehud Turgeman, Yoav J Interv Cardiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Sinus node artery occlusion (SNO) is a rare complication of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We analyze both the short- and long-term consequences of SNO. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 1379 consecutive PCI's involving RCA and Cx arteries performed in our heart institute from 2016 to 2019. Median follow-up was 44 ± 5 months. RESULTS: Among the 4844 PCIs performed during the study period, 284 involved the RCA and the circumflex's proximal segment. Periprocedural SNO was estimated by angiography observed in 15 patients (5.3%), all originated from RCA. The majority of SNO occurred during urgent and primary PCIs following acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Sinus node dysfunction (SND) appeared in 12 (80%) of patients. Four (26.6%) patients had sinus bradycardia, which resolved spontaneously, and 8 (53.3%) patients had sinus arrest with an escaped nodal rhythm, which mostly responded to medical treatment during the first 24 hours. There was no association between PCI technique and outcome. Three patients (20%) required urgent temporary ventricular pacing. One patient had permanent pacemaker implantation. Pacemaker interrogation during follow-up revealed a recovery of the sinus node function after one month. CONCLUSION: SNO is rare and seen mostly during angioplasty to the proximal segment of the RCA during ACS. The risk of developing sinus node dysfunction following SNO is high. SND usually appears during the first 24 h of PCI. The majority of SND patients responded to medical treatment, and only in rare cases were permanent pacemakers required. Hindawi 2021-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8024099/ /pubmed/33859544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8810484 Text en Copyright © 2021 Ofir Koren et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Koren, Ofir
Antonelli, Dante
Khamaise, Ranya
Ehrenberg, Scott
Rozner, Ehud
Turgeman, Yoav
Sinus Node Dysfunction due to Occlusion of the Sinus Node Artery during Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title Sinus Node Dysfunction due to Occlusion of the Sinus Node Artery during Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title_full Sinus Node Dysfunction due to Occlusion of the Sinus Node Artery during Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title_fullStr Sinus Node Dysfunction due to Occlusion of the Sinus Node Artery during Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title_full_unstemmed Sinus Node Dysfunction due to Occlusion of the Sinus Node Artery during Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title_short Sinus Node Dysfunction due to Occlusion of the Sinus Node Artery during Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title_sort sinus node dysfunction due to occlusion of the sinus node artery during percutaneous coronary intervention
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8024099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33859544
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8810484
work_keys_str_mv AT korenofir sinusnodedysfunctionduetoocclusionofthesinusnodearteryduringpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT antonellidante sinusnodedysfunctionduetoocclusionofthesinusnodearteryduringpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT khamaiseranya sinusnodedysfunctionduetoocclusionofthesinusnodearteryduringpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT ehrenbergscott sinusnodedysfunctionduetoocclusionofthesinusnodearteryduringpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT roznerehud sinusnodedysfunctionduetoocclusionofthesinusnodearteryduringpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT turgemanyoav sinusnodedysfunctionduetoocclusionofthesinusnodearteryduringpercutaneouscoronaryintervention