Cargando…

The “Great Debate” at Immunotherapy Bridge 2020, December 3rd, 2020

As part of the 2020 Immunotherapy Bridge virtual congress (December 2nd–3rd, Italy), the Great Debate session featured counterpoint views from leading experts on three clinical questions in immunotherapy today. The first of these was whether antitumoral vaccination is still a treatment option. The s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ascierto, Paolo A., Brody, Joshua, Butterfield, Lisa H., Finn, Olivera J., Goldberg, John, Perrone, Francesco, Sullivan, Ryan J., Fox, Bernard A., Hwu, Patrick, Puzanov, Igor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8025454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33827609
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-021-02811-8
_version_ 1783675498298081280
author Ascierto, Paolo A.
Brody, Joshua
Butterfield, Lisa H.
Finn, Olivera J.
Goldberg, John
Perrone, Francesco
Sullivan, Ryan J.
Fox, Bernard A.
Hwu, Patrick
Puzanov, Igor
author_facet Ascierto, Paolo A.
Brody, Joshua
Butterfield, Lisa H.
Finn, Olivera J.
Goldberg, John
Perrone, Francesco
Sullivan, Ryan J.
Fox, Bernard A.
Hwu, Patrick
Puzanov, Igor
author_sort Ascierto, Paolo A.
collection PubMed
description As part of the 2020 Immunotherapy Bridge virtual congress (December 2nd–3rd, Italy), the Great Debate session featured counterpoint views from leading experts on three clinical questions in immunotherapy today. The first of these was whether antitumoral vaccination is still a treatment option. The second topic debated whether anti-programmed death (PD)-1/PD-ligand (L)1 blockade should be the backbone for immunotherapy combination. Finally, the use of innovative study designs and surrogate endpoints was considered from both an academic and industry perspective. For each topic, two experts presented the argument and counter-argument in support of two different points of view. As with previous Bridge congresses, the debates were assigned by meeting Chairs and positions taken by experts during the debates may not have necessarily reflected their respective personal view. The views summarised in this article are based on available evidence but may reflect personal interpretation of these data, clinical experience and subjective opinion of the speaker.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8025454
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80254542021-04-07 The “Great Debate” at Immunotherapy Bridge 2020, December 3rd, 2020 Ascierto, Paolo A. Brody, Joshua Butterfield, Lisa H. Finn, Olivera J. Goldberg, John Perrone, Francesco Sullivan, Ryan J. Fox, Bernard A. Hwu, Patrick Puzanov, Igor J Transl Med Meeting Report As part of the 2020 Immunotherapy Bridge virtual congress (December 2nd–3rd, Italy), the Great Debate session featured counterpoint views from leading experts on three clinical questions in immunotherapy today. The first of these was whether antitumoral vaccination is still a treatment option. The second topic debated whether anti-programmed death (PD)-1/PD-ligand (L)1 blockade should be the backbone for immunotherapy combination. Finally, the use of innovative study designs and surrogate endpoints was considered from both an academic and industry perspective. For each topic, two experts presented the argument and counter-argument in support of two different points of view. As with previous Bridge congresses, the debates were assigned by meeting Chairs and positions taken by experts during the debates may not have necessarily reflected their respective personal view. The views summarised in this article are based on available evidence but may reflect personal interpretation of these data, clinical experience and subjective opinion of the speaker. BioMed Central 2021-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8025454/ /pubmed/33827609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-021-02811-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Meeting Report
Ascierto, Paolo A.
Brody, Joshua
Butterfield, Lisa H.
Finn, Olivera J.
Goldberg, John
Perrone, Francesco
Sullivan, Ryan J.
Fox, Bernard A.
Hwu, Patrick
Puzanov, Igor
The “Great Debate” at Immunotherapy Bridge 2020, December 3rd, 2020
title The “Great Debate” at Immunotherapy Bridge 2020, December 3rd, 2020
title_full The “Great Debate” at Immunotherapy Bridge 2020, December 3rd, 2020
title_fullStr The “Great Debate” at Immunotherapy Bridge 2020, December 3rd, 2020
title_full_unstemmed The “Great Debate” at Immunotherapy Bridge 2020, December 3rd, 2020
title_short The “Great Debate” at Immunotherapy Bridge 2020, December 3rd, 2020
title_sort “great debate” at immunotherapy bridge 2020, december 3rd, 2020
topic Meeting Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8025454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33827609
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-021-02811-8
work_keys_str_mv AT asciertopaoloa thegreatdebateatimmunotherapybridge2020december3rd2020
AT brodyjoshua thegreatdebateatimmunotherapybridge2020december3rd2020
AT butterfieldlisah thegreatdebateatimmunotherapybridge2020december3rd2020
AT finnoliveraj thegreatdebateatimmunotherapybridge2020december3rd2020
AT goldbergjohn thegreatdebateatimmunotherapybridge2020december3rd2020
AT perronefrancesco thegreatdebateatimmunotherapybridge2020december3rd2020
AT sullivanryanj thegreatdebateatimmunotherapybridge2020december3rd2020
AT foxbernarda thegreatdebateatimmunotherapybridge2020december3rd2020
AT hwupatrick thegreatdebateatimmunotherapybridge2020december3rd2020
AT puzanovigor thegreatdebateatimmunotherapybridge2020december3rd2020
AT asciertopaoloa greatdebateatimmunotherapybridge2020december3rd2020
AT brodyjoshua greatdebateatimmunotherapybridge2020december3rd2020
AT butterfieldlisah greatdebateatimmunotherapybridge2020december3rd2020
AT finnoliveraj greatdebateatimmunotherapybridge2020december3rd2020
AT goldbergjohn greatdebateatimmunotherapybridge2020december3rd2020
AT perronefrancesco greatdebateatimmunotherapybridge2020december3rd2020
AT sullivanryanj greatdebateatimmunotherapybridge2020december3rd2020
AT foxbernarda greatdebateatimmunotherapybridge2020december3rd2020
AT hwupatrick greatdebateatimmunotherapybridge2020december3rd2020
AT puzanovigor greatdebateatimmunotherapybridge2020december3rd2020