Cargando…

Field performance evaluation of the PanBio rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay in an epidemic driven by the B.1.351 variant in the Eastern Cape, South Africa

BACKGROUND: South Africa was the African country with the most recorded cases of SARS-CoV-2 during 2020, experiencing 2 waves of infection. During the first wave, diagnostics were largely based on reverse transcription-linked PCR (RT-PCR). The Abbott PanBio antigen test was deployed during the 2nd w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Akingba, Oluwakemi Laguda, Sprong, Kaitlin, Marais, Gert, Hardie, Diana Ruth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8025602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35262001
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcvp.2021.100013
_version_ 1783675527644577792
author Akingba, Oluwakemi Laguda
Sprong, Kaitlin
Marais, Gert
Hardie, Diana Ruth
author_facet Akingba, Oluwakemi Laguda
Sprong, Kaitlin
Marais, Gert
Hardie, Diana Ruth
author_sort Akingba, Oluwakemi Laguda
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: South Africa was the African country with the most recorded cases of SARS-CoV-2 during 2020, experiencing 2 waves of infection. During the first wave, diagnostics were largely based on reverse transcription-linked PCR (RT-PCR). The Abbott PanBio antigen test was deployed during the 2nd wave which may have been driven by emergence of the B.1.351 variant. At the time of evaluation in mid-November 2020, B.1.351 was the dominant circulating virus in Nelson Mandela Bay, in the Eastern Cape Province. METHODS: Used PanBio antigen swabs (collected from patients with genetically characterised virus) were first validated as suitable for PCR. A prospective study was then undertaken to evaluate assay performance in the field. Testing was conducted at mobile community testing centres on 677 ambulant patients. Used swabs were kept and tested by RT-PCR. RESULTS: During initial validation, used swabs in proprietary lysis buffer were found to be suitable for PCR and secondly, the PB assay reliably detected patients infected with B.1.351. In the field study, of 146 RT-PCR positive individuals, 101 were RTD positive in the clinic. The RTD had a sensitivity of 69.2% (95%CI 61.4, 75.8) and specificity of 99.0% (95%CI 98.8, 99.3). Sensitivity was dependent on the amount of viral RNA in clinical samples, as reflected by the PCR cycle threshold (CT) value. CONCLUSIONS: The assay reliably detected B.1.351 infections in ambulatory ill patients during initial validation and in field testing. In the field, assay sensitivity was >90% in patients with high viral loads who are expected to be most infectious. Negative and positive predictive values were also >90%.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8025602
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80256022021-04-07 Field performance evaluation of the PanBio rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay in an epidemic driven by the B.1.351 variant in the Eastern Cape, South Africa Akingba, Oluwakemi Laguda Sprong, Kaitlin Marais, Gert Hardie, Diana Ruth Journal of Clinical Virology Plus Short Communication BACKGROUND: South Africa was the African country with the most recorded cases of SARS-CoV-2 during 2020, experiencing 2 waves of infection. During the first wave, diagnostics were largely based on reverse transcription-linked PCR (RT-PCR). The Abbott PanBio antigen test was deployed during the 2nd wave which may have been driven by emergence of the B.1.351 variant. At the time of evaluation in mid-November 2020, B.1.351 was the dominant circulating virus in Nelson Mandela Bay, in the Eastern Cape Province. METHODS: Used PanBio antigen swabs (collected from patients with genetically characterised virus) were first validated as suitable for PCR. A prospective study was then undertaken to evaluate assay performance in the field. Testing was conducted at mobile community testing centres on 677 ambulant patients. Used swabs were kept and tested by RT-PCR. RESULTS: During initial validation, used swabs in proprietary lysis buffer were found to be suitable for PCR and secondly, the PB assay reliably detected patients infected with B.1.351. In the field study, of 146 RT-PCR positive individuals, 101 were RTD positive in the clinic. The RTD had a sensitivity of 69.2% (95%CI 61.4, 75.8) and specificity of 99.0% (95%CI 98.8, 99.3). Sensitivity was dependent on the amount of viral RNA in clinical samples, as reflected by the PCR cycle threshold (CT) value. CONCLUSIONS: The assay reliably detected B.1.351 infections in ambulatory ill patients during initial validation and in field testing. In the field, assay sensitivity was >90% in patients with high viral loads who are expected to be most infectious. Negative and positive predictive values were also >90%. The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2021-06 2021-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8025602/ /pubmed/35262001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcvp.2021.100013 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Short Communication
Akingba, Oluwakemi Laguda
Sprong, Kaitlin
Marais, Gert
Hardie, Diana Ruth
Field performance evaluation of the PanBio rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay in an epidemic driven by the B.1.351 variant in the Eastern Cape, South Africa
title Field performance evaluation of the PanBio rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay in an epidemic driven by the B.1.351 variant in the Eastern Cape, South Africa
title_full Field performance evaluation of the PanBio rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay in an epidemic driven by the B.1.351 variant in the Eastern Cape, South Africa
title_fullStr Field performance evaluation of the PanBio rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay in an epidemic driven by the B.1.351 variant in the Eastern Cape, South Africa
title_full_unstemmed Field performance evaluation of the PanBio rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay in an epidemic driven by the B.1.351 variant in the Eastern Cape, South Africa
title_short Field performance evaluation of the PanBio rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay in an epidemic driven by the B.1.351 variant in the Eastern Cape, South Africa
title_sort field performance evaluation of the panbio rapid sars-cov-2 antigen assay in an epidemic driven by the b.1.351 variant in the eastern cape, south africa
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8025602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35262001
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcvp.2021.100013
work_keys_str_mv AT akingbaoluwakemilaguda fieldperformanceevaluationofthepanbiorapidsarscov2antigenassayinanepidemicdrivenbytheb1351variantintheeasterncapesouthafrica
AT sprongkaitlin fieldperformanceevaluationofthepanbiorapidsarscov2antigenassayinanepidemicdrivenbytheb1351variantintheeasterncapesouthafrica
AT maraisgert fieldperformanceevaluationofthepanbiorapidsarscov2antigenassayinanepidemicdrivenbytheb1351variantintheeasterncapesouthafrica
AT hardiedianaruth fieldperformanceevaluationofthepanbiorapidsarscov2antigenassayinanepidemicdrivenbytheb1351variantintheeasterncapesouthafrica