Cargando…

Use of aminoglycoside antibiotics in equine clinical practice; a questionnaire‐based study of current use

Veterinary use of the aminoglycoside antibiotics is under increasing scrutiny. This questionnaire‐based study aimed to document the use of aminoglycosides with a particular focus on gentamicin. An online questionnaire was delivered to generalist equine veterinary surgeons and specialists in internal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Redpath, Adam, Hallowell, Gayle D., Bowen, Ian Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8025607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33099884
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/vms3.382
_version_ 1783675528569421824
author Redpath, Adam
Hallowell, Gayle D.
Bowen, Ian Mark
author_facet Redpath, Adam
Hallowell, Gayle D.
Bowen, Ian Mark
author_sort Redpath, Adam
collection PubMed
description Veterinary use of the aminoglycoside antibiotics is under increasing scrutiny. This questionnaire‐based study aimed to document the use of aminoglycosides with a particular focus on gentamicin. An online questionnaire was delivered to generalist equine veterinary surgeons and specialists in internal medicine to determine the perceived importance, frequency of use and routes of administration of the aminoglycoside antibiotics. A series of hypothetical scenarios were also evaluated regarding gentamicin. Data were compared to evaluate the impact of the level of specialisation on prescribing practices for different antibiotics using Chi‐squared and Fischer's exact tests. Data were analysed from 111 responses. Gentamicin was commonly used empirically without culture and susceptibility testing. Generalists were more likely to use gentamicin only after susceptibility testing than specialists in a variety of clinical presentations including respiratory diseases, septic peritonitis, acute febrile diarrhoea, cellulitis and contaminated limb wounds (p < 0.01). Intravenous administration of gentamicin was most common, although inhaled and regional administration of gentamicin and amikacin were also described. Amikacin was most commonly used by intra‐articular administration. Gentamicin was more likely to be used in high‐risk procedures or contaminated surgeries (86% and 74%, respectively) compared with clean surgery (32%; p < 0.0001). Gentamicin was often used perioperatively in horses undergoing exploratory celiotomy and more commonly used in horses undergoing an enterotomy (90%) than without and enterotomy (79%; p = 0.04). Most respondents (86%) used gentamicin at a dose of 6.6 mg/kg in adults, with few changing their dosing strategies based on the presence of sepsis, although higher doses were more reported in foals (7–15 mg/kg) irrespective of the presence of sepsis. Aminoglycosides are widely used in equine practice and use outside current EU marketing authorisations is common. Stewardship of the aminoglycoside antibiotics could be enhanced in both generalists and specialists through the more frequent use of susceptibility testing, regional administration and dose adjustment, especially in foals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8025607
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80256072021-04-13 Use of aminoglycoside antibiotics in equine clinical practice; a questionnaire‐based study of current use Redpath, Adam Hallowell, Gayle D. Bowen, Ian Mark Vet Med Sci Original Articles Veterinary use of the aminoglycoside antibiotics is under increasing scrutiny. This questionnaire‐based study aimed to document the use of aminoglycosides with a particular focus on gentamicin. An online questionnaire was delivered to generalist equine veterinary surgeons and specialists in internal medicine to determine the perceived importance, frequency of use and routes of administration of the aminoglycoside antibiotics. A series of hypothetical scenarios were also evaluated regarding gentamicin. Data were compared to evaluate the impact of the level of specialisation on prescribing practices for different antibiotics using Chi‐squared and Fischer's exact tests. Data were analysed from 111 responses. Gentamicin was commonly used empirically without culture and susceptibility testing. Generalists were more likely to use gentamicin only after susceptibility testing than specialists in a variety of clinical presentations including respiratory diseases, septic peritonitis, acute febrile diarrhoea, cellulitis and contaminated limb wounds (p < 0.01). Intravenous administration of gentamicin was most common, although inhaled and regional administration of gentamicin and amikacin were also described. Amikacin was most commonly used by intra‐articular administration. Gentamicin was more likely to be used in high‐risk procedures or contaminated surgeries (86% and 74%, respectively) compared with clean surgery (32%; p < 0.0001). Gentamicin was often used perioperatively in horses undergoing exploratory celiotomy and more commonly used in horses undergoing an enterotomy (90%) than without and enterotomy (79%; p = 0.04). Most respondents (86%) used gentamicin at a dose of 6.6 mg/kg in adults, with few changing their dosing strategies based on the presence of sepsis, although higher doses were more reported in foals (7–15 mg/kg) irrespective of the presence of sepsis. Aminoglycosides are widely used in equine practice and use outside current EU marketing authorisations is common. Stewardship of the aminoglycoside antibiotics could be enhanced in both generalists and specialists through the more frequent use of susceptibility testing, regional administration and dose adjustment, especially in foals. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8025607/ /pubmed/33099884 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/vms3.382 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Veterinary Medicine and Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Redpath, Adam
Hallowell, Gayle D.
Bowen, Ian Mark
Use of aminoglycoside antibiotics in equine clinical practice; a questionnaire‐based study of current use
title Use of aminoglycoside antibiotics in equine clinical practice; a questionnaire‐based study of current use
title_full Use of aminoglycoside antibiotics in equine clinical practice; a questionnaire‐based study of current use
title_fullStr Use of aminoglycoside antibiotics in equine clinical practice; a questionnaire‐based study of current use
title_full_unstemmed Use of aminoglycoside antibiotics in equine clinical practice; a questionnaire‐based study of current use
title_short Use of aminoglycoside antibiotics in equine clinical practice; a questionnaire‐based study of current use
title_sort use of aminoglycoside antibiotics in equine clinical practice; a questionnaire‐based study of current use
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8025607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33099884
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/vms3.382
work_keys_str_mv AT redpathadam useofaminoglycosideantibioticsinequineclinicalpracticeaquestionnairebasedstudyofcurrentuse
AT hallowellgayled useofaminoglycosideantibioticsinequineclinicalpracticeaquestionnairebasedstudyofcurrentuse
AT bowenianmark useofaminoglycosideantibioticsinequineclinicalpracticeaquestionnairebasedstudyofcurrentuse