Cargando…
A retrospective study (2007–2015) on brucellosis seropositivity in livestock in South Africa
In South Africa, brucellosis testing and record‐keeping are done by several laboratories, thus it is difficult to access any organized data to assess the status of the disease. This study evaluated the seropositivity for brucellosis using Rose Bengal test and complement fixation test in suspect catt...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8025618/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33091227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/vms3.363 |
_version_ | 1783675531556814848 |
---|---|
author | Kolo, Francis B. Adesiyun, Abiodun A. Fasina, Folorunso O. Potts, Andrew Dogonyaro, Banenat B. Katsande, Charles T. Van Heerden, Henriette |
author_facet | Kolo, Francis B. Adesiyun, Abiodun A. Fasina, Folorunso O. Potts, Andrew Dogonyaro, Banenat B. Katsande, Charles T. Van Heerden, Henriette |
author_sort | Kolo, Francis B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In South Africa, brucellosis testing and record‐keeping are done by several laboratories, thus it is difficult to access any organized data to assess the status of the disease. This study evaluated the seropositivity for brucellosis using Rose Bengal test and complement fixation test in suspect cattle, sheep, goats and pigs sera submitted to Bacterial Serology Laboratory, Agricultural Research Council‐Onderstepoort Veterinary Research (ARC‐OVR) from nine provinces in the country during the period 2007–2015. This retrospective data analysis was conducted to estimate the occurrence of brucellosis in the country from the submitted samples, identify variables that affected seropositivity for brucellosis, investigate existing gaps in data recording and make recommendations on important variables to facilitate better data capture and inferences on brucellosis. Nine years of data were collated and analysed to detect association (seropositivity over time regarding animal species and location). Of the 764,276 animals tested, the distribution of samples was 90.50% (691,539/764,276), 5.19% (39,672/764,276), 3.92% (29,967/764,276) and 0.41% (3,098/764,276) for cattle, sheep, goats and pigs, respectively. The seropositivity for brucellosis by animal species was 6.31% (43,666/691,539, 95% CI: 6.26–6.37), 2.09% (828/39,672, 95% CI: 1.95–2.23), 0.63% (189/29,967, 95% CI: 0.55–0.73) and 0.13% (4/3,098, 95% CI: 0.05–0.33) in cattle, sheep, goats and pigs respectively. The data available did not capture information on the age, sex, breed and other host risk factors that would have been related to seropositivity for brucellosis. The data provide an understanding of the disease occurrence and confirm that brucellosis is enzootic in South Africa. Improved and standardized data collection can be used to pro‐actively drive, monitor, change or formulate policies to mitigate the challenges brought about by brucellosis in the livestock sector in South Africa. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8025618 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80256182021-04-13 A retrospective study (2007–2015) on brucellosis seropositivity in livestock in South Africa Kolo, Francis B. Adesiyun, Abiodun A. Fasina, Folorunso O. Potts, Andrew Dogonyaro, Banenat B. Katsande, Charles T. Van Heerden, Henriette Vet Med Sci Original Articles In South Africa, brucellosis testing and record‐keeping are done by several laboratories, thus it is difficult to access any organized data to assess the status of the disease. This study evaluated the seropositivity for brucellosis using Rose Bengal test and complement fixation test in suspect cattle, sheep, goats and pigs sera submitted to Bacterial Serology Laboratory, Agricultural Research Council‐Onderstepoort Veterinary Research (ARC‐OVR) from nine provinces in the country during the period 2007–2015. This retrospective data analysis was conducted to estimate the occurrence of brucellosis in the country from the submitted samples, identify variables that affected seropositivity for brucellosis, investigate existing gaps in data recording and make recommendations on important variables to facilitate better data capture and inferences on brucellosis. Nine years of data were collated and analysed to detect association (seropositivity over time regarding animal species and location). Of the 764,276 animals tested, the distribution of samples was 90.50% (691,539/764,276), 5.19% (39,672/764,276), 3.92% (29,967/764,276) and 0.41% (3,098/764,276) for cattle, sheep, goats and pigs, respectively. The seropositivity for brucellosis by animal species was 6.31% (43,666/691,539, 95% CI: 6.26–6.37), 2.09% (828/39,672, 95% CI: 1.95–2.23), 0.63% (189/29,967, 95% CI: 0.55–0.73) and 0.13% (4/3,098, 95% CI: 0.05–0.33) in cattle, sheep, goats and pigs respectively. The data available did not capture information on the age, sex, breed and other host risk factors that would have been related to seropositivity for brucellosis. The data provide an understanding of the disease occurrence and confirm that brucellosis is enzootic in South Africa. Improved and standardized data collection can be used to pro‐actively drive, monitor, change or formulate policies to mitigate the challenges brought about by brucellosis in the livestock sector in South Africa. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8025618/ /pubmed/33091227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/vms3.363 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Veterinary Medicine and Science Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Kolo, Francis B. Adesiyun, Abiodun A. Fasina, Folorunso O. Potts, Andrew Dogonyaro, Banenat B. Katsande, Charles T. Van Heerden, Henriette A retrospective study (2007–2015) on brucellosis seropositivity in livestock in South Africa |
title | A retrospective study (2007–2015) on brucellosis seropositivity in livestock in South Africa |
title_full | A retrospective study (2007–2015) on brucellosis seropositivity in livestock in South Africa |
title_fullStr | A retrospective study (2007–2015) on brucellosis seropositivity in livestock in South Africa |
title_full_unstemmed | A retrospective study (2007–2015) on brucellosis seropositivity in livestock in South Africa |
title_short | A retrospective study (2007–2015) on brucellosis seropositivity in livestock in South Africa |
title_sort | retrospective study (2007–2015) on brucellosis seropositivity in livestock in south africa |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8025618/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33091227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/vms3.363 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kolofrancisb aretrospectivestudy20072015onbrucellosisseropositivityinlivestockinsouthafrica AT adesiyunabioduna aretrospectivestudy20072015onbrucellosisseropositivityinlivestockinsouthafrica AT fasinafolorunsoo aretrospectivestudy20072015onbrucellosisseropositivityinlivestockinsouthafrica AT pottsandrew aretrospectivestudy20072015onbrucellosisseropositivityinlivestockinsouthafrica AT dogonyarobanenatb aretrospectivestudy20072015onbrucellosisseropositivityinlivestockinsouthafrica AT katsandecharlest aretrospectivestudy20072015onbrucellosisseropositivityinlivestockinsouthafrica AT vanheerdenhenriette aretrospectivestudy20072015onbrucellosisseropositivityinlivestockinsouthafrica AT kolofrancisb retrospectivestudy20072015onbrucellosisseropositivityinlivestockinsouthafrica AT adesiyunabioduna retrospectivestudy20072015onbrucellosisseropositivityinlivestockinsouthafrica AT fasinafolorunsoo retrospectivestudy20072015onbrucellosisseropositivityinlivestockinsouthafrica AT pottsandrew retrospectivestudy20072015onbrucellosisseropositivityinlivestockinsouthafrica AT dogonyarobanenatb retrospectivestudy20072015onbrucellosisseropositivityinlivestockinsouthafrica AT katsandecharlest retrospectivestudy20072015onbrucellosisseropositivityinlivestockinsouthafrica AT vanheerdenhenriette retrospectivestudy20072015onbrucellosisseropositivityinlivestockinsouthafrica |