Cargando…

A retrospective study (2007–2015) on brucellosis seropositivity in livestock in South Africa

In South Africa, brucellosis testing and record‐keeping are done by several laboratories, thus it is difficult to access any organized data to assess the status of the disease. This study evaluated the seropositivity for brucellosis using Rose Bengal test and complement fixation test in suspect catt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kolo, Francis B., Adesiyun, Abiodun A., Fasina, Folorunso O., Potts, Andrew, Dogonyaro, Banenat B., Katsande, Charles T., Van Heerden, Henriette
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8025618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33091227
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/vms3.363
_version_ 1783675531556814848
author Kolo, Francis B.
Adesiyun, Abiodun A.
Fasina, Folorunso O.
Potts, Andrew
Dogonyaro, Banenat B.
Katsande, Charles T.
Van Heerden, Henriette
author_facet Kolo, Francis B.
Adesiyun, Abiodun A.
Fasina, Folorunso O.
Potts, Andrew
Dogonyaro, Banenat B.
Katsande, Charles T.
Van Heerden, Henriette
author_sort Kolo, Francis B.
collection PubMed
description In South Africa, brucellosis testing and record‐keeping are done by several laboratories, thus it is difficult to access any organized data to assess the status of the disease. This study evaluated the seropositivity for brucellosis using Rose Bengal test and complement fixation test in suspect cattle, sheep, goats and pigs sera submitted to Bacterial Serology Laboratory, Agricultural Research Council‐Onderstepoort Veterinary Research (ARC‐OVR) from nine provinces in the country during the period 2007–2015. This retrospective data analysis was conducted to estimate the occurrence of brucellosis in the country from the submitted samples, identify variables that affected seropositivity for brucellosis, investigate existing gaps in data recording and make recommendations on important variables to facilitate better data capture and inferences on brucellosis. Nine years of data were collated and analysed to detect association (seropositivity over time regarding animal species and location). Of the 764,276 animals tested, the distribution of samples was 90.50% (691,539/764,276), 5.19% (39,672/764,276), 3.92% (29,967/764,276) and 0.41% (3,098/764,276) for cattle, sheep, goats and pigs, respectively. The seropositivity for brucellosis by animal species was 6.31% (43,666/691,539, 95% CI: 6.26–6.37), 2.09% (828/39,672, 95% CI: 1.95–2.23), 0.63% (189/29,967, 95% CI: 0.55–0.73) and 0.13% (4/3,098, 95% CI: 0.05–0.33) in cattle, sheep, goats and pigs respectively. The data available did not capture information on the age, sex, breed and other host risk factors that would have been related to seropositivity for brucellosis. The data provide an understanding of the disease occurrence and confirm that brucellosis is enzootic in South Africa. Improved and standardized data collection can be used to pro‐actively drive, monitor, change or formulate policies to mitigate the challenges brought about by brucellosis in the livestock sector in South Africa.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8025618
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80256182021-04-13 A retrospective study (2007–2015) on brucellosis seropositivity in livestock in South Africa Kolo, Francis B. Adesiyun, Abiodun A. Fasina, Folorunso O. Potts, Andrew Dogonyaro, Banenat B. Katsande, Charles T. Van Heerden, Henriette Vet Med Sci Original Articles In South Africa, brucellosis testing and record‐keeping are done by several laboratories, thus it is difficult to access any organized data to assess the status of the disease. This study evaluated the seropositivity for brucellosis using Rose Bengal test and complement fixation test in suspect cattle, sheep, goats and pigs sera submitted to Bacterial Serology Laboratory, Agricultural Research Council‐Onderstepoort Veterinary Research (ARC‐OVR) from nine provinces in the country during the period 2007–2015. This retrospective data analysis was conducted to estimate the occurrence of brucellosis in the country from the submitted samples, identify variables that affected seropositivity for brucellosis, investigate existing gaps in data recording and make recommendations on important variables to facilitate better data capture and inferences on brucellosis. Nine years of data were collated and analysed to detect association (seropositivity over time regarding animal species and location). Of the 764,276 animals tested, the distribution of samples was 90.50% (691,539/764,276), 5.19% (39,672/764,276), 3.92% (29,967/764,276) and 0.41% (3,098/764,276) for cattle, sheep, goats and pigs, respectively. The seropositivity for brucellosis by animal species was 6.31% (43,666/691,539, 95% CI: 6.26–6.37), 2.09% (828/39,672, 95% CI: 1.95–2.23), 0.63% (189/29,967, 95% CI: 0.55–0.73) and 0.13% (4/3,098, 95% CI: 0.05–0.33) in cattle, sheep, goats and pigs respectively. The data available did not capture information on the age, sex, breed and other host risk factors that would have been related to seropositivity for brucellosis. The data provide an understanding of the disease occurrence and confirm that brucellosis is enzootic in South Africa. Improved and standardized data collection can be used to pro‐actively drive, monitor, change or formulate policies to mitigate the challenges brought about by brucellosis in the livestock sector in South Africa. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8025618/ /pubmed/33091227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/vms3.363 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Veterinary Medicine and Science Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Kolo, Francis B.
Adesiyun, Abiodun A.
Fasina, Folorunso O.
Potts, Andrew
Dogonyaro, Banenat B.
Katsande, Charles T.
Van Heerden, Henriette
A retrospective study (2007–2015) on brucellosis seropositivity in livestock in South Africa
title A retrospective study (2007–2015) on brucellosis seropositivity in livestock in South Africa
title_full A retrospective study (2007–2015) on brucellosis seropositivity in livestock in South Africa
title_fullStr A retrospective study (2007–2015) on brucellosis seropositivity in livestock in South Africa
title_full_unstemmed A retrospective study (2007–2015) on brucellosis seropositivity in livestock in South Africa
title_short A retrospective study (2007–2015) on brucellosis seropositivity in livestock in South Africa
title_sort retrospective study (2007–2015) on brucellosis seropositivity in livestock in south africa
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8025618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33091227
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/vms3.363
work_keys_str_mv AT kolofrancisb aretrospectivestudy20072015onbrucellosisseropositivityinlivestockinsouthafrica
AT adesiyunabioduna aretrospectivestudy20072015onbrucellosisseropositivityinlivestockinsouthafrica
AT fasinafolorunsoo aretrospectivestudy20072015onbrucellosisseropositivityinlivestockinsouthafrica
AT pottsandrew aretrospectivestudy20072015onbrucellosisseropositivityinlivestockinsouthafrica
AT dogonyarobanenatb aretrospectivestudy20072015onbrucellosisseropositivityinlivestockinsouthafrica
AT katsandecharlest aretrospectivestudy20072015onbrucellosisseropositivityinlivestockinsouthafrica
AT vanheerdenhenriette aretrospectivestudy20072015onbrucellosisseropositivityinlivestockinsouthafrica
AT kolofrancisb retrospectivestudy20072015onbrucellosisseropositivityinlivestockinsouthafrica
AT adesiyunabioduna retrospectivestudy20072015onbrucellosisseropositivityinlivestockinsouthafrica
AT fasinafolorunsoo retrospectivestudy20072015onbrucellosisseropositivityinlivestockinsouthafrica
AT pottsandrew retrospectivestudy20072015onbrucellosisseropositivityinlivestockinsouthafrica
AT dogonyarobanenatb retrospectivestudy20072015onbrucellosisseropositivityinlivestockinsouthafrica
AT katsandecharlest retrospectivestudy20072015onbrucellosisseropositivityinlivestockinsouthafrica
AT vanheerdenhenriette retrospectivestudy20072015onbrucellosisseropositivityinlivestockinsouthafrica