Cargando…

Fecal microbiota transplantation: Uses, questions, and ethics

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has rapidly grown in notoriety and popularity worldwide as a treatment for both recurrent and refractory C. difficile infection (CDI), as well as for a myriad of other indications, with varying levels of evidence to justify its use. At present, FMT use in the U...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grigoryan, Zoya, Shen, Michael J., Twardus, Shaina W., Beuttler, Marc M., Chen, Lea Ann, Bateman-House, Alison
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8026161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33834162
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.medmic.2020.100027
_version_ 1783675622994739200
author Grigoryan, Zoya
Shen, Michael J.
Twardus, Shaina W.
Beuttler, Marc M.
Chen, Lea Ann
Bateman-House, Alison
author_facet Grigoryan, Zoya
Shen, Michael J.
Twardus, Shaina W.
Beuttler, Marc M.
Chen, Lea Ann
Bateman-House, Alison
author_sort Grigoryan, Zoya
collection PubMed
description Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has rapidly grown in notoriety and popularity worldwide as a treatment for both recurrent and refractory C. difficile infection (CDI), as well as for a myriad of other indications, with varying levels of evidence to justify its use. At present, FMT use in the U.S. has not received marketing approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), but is permitted under “enforcement discretion” for CDI not responding to standard therapy. Meanwhile, the rising interest in the gut microbiome throughout mainstream media has paved the way for “do-it-yourself” (DIY) adaptations of the procedure. This access and unregulated use, often outside any clinical supervision, has quickly outpaced the medical community’s research and regulatory efforts. While some studies have been able to demonstrate the success of FMT in treating conditions other than CDI—studies on ulcerative colitis have been particularly promising—little is still known about the treatmen’s mechanism of action or long-term side effects. Likewise, screening of donor stool is in its early stages in terms of protocol standardization. In this paper, we explore the regulatory and ethical concerns that arise from the need to balance access to a nascent but promising innovative treatment with the need for research into its efficacy, risk profile, and long-term impact.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8026161
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80261612021-04-07 Fecal microbiota transplantation: Uses, questions, and ethics Grigoryan, Zoya Shen, Michael J. Twardus, Shaina W. Beuttler, Marc M. Chen, Lea Ann Bateman-House, Alison Med Microecol Article Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has rapidly grown in notoriety and popularity worldwide as a treatment for both recurrent and refractory C. difficile infection (CDI), as well as for a myriad of other indications, with varying levels of evidence to justify its use. At present, FMT use in the U.S. has not received marketing approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), but is permitted under “enforcement discretion” for CDI not responding to standard therapy. Meanwhile, the rising interest in the gut microbiome throughout mainstream media has paved the way for “do-it-yourself” (DIY) adaptations of the procedure. This access and unregulated use, often outside any clinical supervision, has quickly outpaced the medical community’s research and regulatory efforts. While some studies have been able to demonstrate the success of FMT in treating conditions other than CDI—studies on ulcerative colitis have been particularly promising—little is still known about the treatmen’s mechanism of action or long-term side effects. Likewise, screening of donor stool is in its early stages in terms of protocol standardization. In this paper, we explore the regulatory and ethical concerns that arise from the need to balance access to a nascent but promising innovative treatment with the need for research into its efficacy, risk profile, and long-term impact. 2020-10-20 2020-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8026161/ /pubmed/33834162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.medmic.2020.100027 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Article
Grigoryan, Zoya
Shen, Michael J.
Twardus, Shaina W.
Beuttler, Marc M.
Chen, Lea Ann
Bateman-House, Alison
Fecal microbiota transplantation: Uses, questions, and ethics
title Fecal microbiota transplantation: Uses, questions, and ethics
title_full Fecal microbiota transplantation: Uses, questions, and ethics
title_fullStr Fecal microbiota transplantation: Uses, questions, and ethics
title_full_unstemmed Fecal microbiota transplantation: Uses, questions, and ethics
title_short Fecal microbiota transplantation: Uses, questions, and ethics
title_sort fecal microbiota transplantation: uses, questions, and ethics
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8026161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33834162
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.medmic.2020.100027
work_keys_str_mv AT grigoryanzoya fecalmicrobiotatransplantationusesquestionsandethics
AT shenmichaelj fecalmicrobiotatransplantationusesquestionsandethics
AT twardusshainaw fecalmicrobiotatransplantationusesquestionsandethics
AT beuttlermarcm fecalmicrobiotatransplantationusesquestionsandethics
AT chenleaann fecalmicrobiotatransplantationusesquestionsandethics
AT batemanhousealison fecalmicrobiotatransplantationusesquestionsandethics