Cargando…
Fecal microbiota transplantation: Uses, questions, and ethics
Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has rapidly grown in notoriety and popularity worldwide as a treatment for both recurrent and refractory C. difficile infection (CDI), as well as for a myriad of other indications, with varying levels of evidence to justify its use. At present, FMT use in the U...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8026161/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33834162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.medmic.2020.100027 |
_version_ | 1783675622994739200 |
---|---|
author | Grigoryan, Zoya Shen, Michael J. Twardus, Shaina W. Beuttler, Marc M. Chen, Lea Ann Bateman-House, Alison |
author_facet | Grigoryan, Zoya Shen, Michael J. Twardus, Shaina W. Beuttler, Marc M. Chen, Lea Ann Bateman-House, Alison |
author_sort | Grigoryan, Zoya |
collection | PubMed |
description | Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has rapidly grown in notoriety and popularity worldwide as a treatment for both recurrent and refractory C. difficile infection (CDI), as well as for a myriad of other indications, with varying levels of evidence to justify its use. At present, FMT use in the U.S. has not received marketing approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), but is permitted under “enforcement discretion” for CDI not responding to standard therapy. Meanwhile, the rising interest in the gut microbiome throughout mainstream media has paved the way for “do-it-yourself” (DIY) adaptations of the procedure. This access and unregulated use, often outside any clinical supervision, has quickly outpaced the medical community’s research and regulatory efforts. While some studies have been able to demonstrate the success of FMT in treating conditions other than CDI—studies on ulcerative colitis have been particularly promising—little is still known about the treatmen’s mechanism of action or long-term side effects. Likewise, screening of donor stool is in its early stages in terms of protocol standardization. In this paper, we explore the regulatory and ethical concerns that arise from the need to balance access to a nascent but promising innovative treatment with the need for research into its efficacy, risk profile, and long-term impact. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8026161 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80261612021-04-07 Fecal microbiota transplantation: Uses, questions, and ethics Grigoryan, Zoya Shen, Michael J. Twardus, Shaina W. Beuttler, Marc M. Chen, Lea Ann Bateman-House, Alison Med Microecol Article Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has rapidly grown in notoriety and popularity worldwide as a treatment for both recurrent and refractory C. difficile infection (CDI), as well as for a myriad of other indications, with varying levels of evidence to justify its use. At present, FMT use in the U.S. has not received marketing approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), but is permitted under “enforcement discretion” for CDI not responding to standard therapy. Meanwhile, the rising interest in the gut microbiome throughout mainstream media has paved the way for “do-it-yourself” (DIY) adaptations of the procedure. This access and unregulated use, often outside any clinical supervision, has quickly outpaced the medical community’s research and regulatory efforts. While some studies have been able to demonstrate the success of FMT in treating conditions other than CDI—studies on ulcerative colitis have been particularly promising—little is still known about the treatmen’s mechanism of action or long-term side effects. Likewise, screening of donor stool is in its early stages in terms of protocol standardization. In this paper, we explore the regulatory and ethical concerns that arise from the need to balance access to a nascent but promising innovative treatment with the need for research into its efficacy, risk profile, and long-term impact. 2020-10-20 2020-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8026161/ /pubmed/33834162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.medmic.2020.100027 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Article Grigoryan, Zoya Shen, Michael J. Twardus, Shaina W. Beuttler, Marc M. Chen, Lea Ann Bateman-House, Alison Fecal microbiota transplantation: Uses, questions, and ethics |
title | Fecal microbiota transplantation: Uses, questions, and ethics |
title_full | Fecal microbiota transplantation: Uses, questions, and ethics |
title_fullStr | Fecal microbiota transplantation: Uses, questions, and ethics |
title_full_unstemmed | Fecal microbiota transplantation: Uses, questions, and ethics |
title_short | Fecal microbiota transplantation: Uses, questions, and ethics |
title_sort | fecal microbiota transplantation: uses, questions, and ethics |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8026161/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33834162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.medmic.2020.100027 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grigoryanzoya fecalmicrobiotatransplantationusesquestionsandethics AT shenmichaelj fecalmicrobiotatransplantationusesquestionsandethics AT twardusshainaw fecalmicrobiotatransplantationusesquestionsandethics AT beuttlermarcm fecalmicrobiotatransplantationusesquestionsandethics AT chenleaann fecalmicrobiotatransplantationusesquestionsandethics AT batemanhousealison fecalmicrobiotatransplantationusesquestionsandethics |