Cargando…
Comparison of seven commercial SARS-CoV-2 rapid point-of-care antigen tests: a single-centre laboratory evaluation study
BACKGROUND: Antigen point-of-care tests (AgPOCTs) can accelerate SARS-CoV-2 testing. As some AgPOCTs have become available, interest is growing in their utility and performance. Here we aimed to compare the analytical sensitivity and specificity of seven commercially available AgPOCT devices. METHOD...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Ltd
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8026170/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33846704 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00056-2 |
_version_ | 1783675624151318528 |
---|---|
author | Corman, Victor M Haage, Verena Claudia Bleicker, Tobias Schmidt, Marie Luisa Mühlemann, Barbara Zuchowski, Marta Jo, Wendy K Tscheak, Patricia Möncke-Buchner, Elisabeth Müller, Marcel A Krumbholz, Andi Drexler, Jan Felix Drosten, Christian |
author_facet | Corman, Victor M Haage, Verena Claudia Bleicker, Tobias Schmidt, Marie Luisa Mühlemann, Barbara Zuchowski, Marta Jo, Wendy K Tscheak, Patricia Möncke-Buchner, Elisabeth Müller, Marcel A Krumbholz, Andi Drexler, Jan Felix Drosten, Christian |
author_sort | Corman, Victor M |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Antigen point-of-care tests (AgPOCTs) can accelerate SARS-CoV-2 testing. As some AgPOCTs have become available, interest is growing in their utility and performance. Here we aimed to compare the analytical sensitivity and specificity of seven commercially available AgPOCT devices. METHODS: In a single-centre, laboratory evaluation study, we compared AgPOCT products from seven suppliers: the Abbott Panbio COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test, the RapiGEN BIOCREDIT COVID-19 Ag, the Healgen Coronavirus Ag Rapid Test Cassette (Swab), the Coris BioConcept COVID-19 Ag Respi-Strip, the R-Biopharm RIDA QUICK SARS-CoV-2 Antigen, the nal von minden NADAL COVID-19 Ag Test, and the Roche-SD Biosensor SARS-CoV Rapid Antigen Test. Tests were evaluated on recombinant SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein, cultured endemic and emerging coronaviruses, stored respiratory samples with known SARS-CoV-2 viral loads, stored samples from patients with respiratory pathogens other than SARS-CoV-2, and self-sampled swabs from healthy volunteers. We estimated analytical sensitivity in terms of approximate viral concentrations (quantified by real-time RT-PCR) that yielded positive AgPOCT results, and specificity in terms of propensity to generate false-positive results. FINDINGS: In 138 clinical samples with quantified SARS-CoV-2 viral load, the 95% limit of detection (concentration at which 95% of test results were positive) in six of seven AgPOCT products ranged between 2·07 × 10(6) and 2·86 × 10(7) copies per swab, with an outlier (RapiGEN) at 1·57 × 10(10) copies per swab. The assays showed no cross-reactivity towards cell culture or tissue culture supernatants containing any of the four endemic human coronaviruses (HCoV‑229E, HCoV‑NL63, HCoV‑OC43, or HCoV‑HKU1) or MERS-CoV, with the exception of the Healgen assay in one repeat test on HCoV-HKU1 supernatant. SARS-CoV was cross-detected by all assays. Cumulative specificities among stored clinical samples with non-SARS-CoV-2 infections (n=100) and self-samples from healthy volunteers (n=35; cumulative sample n=135) ranged between 98·5% (95% CI 94·2–99·7) and 100·0% (97·2–100·0) in five products, with two outliers at 94·8% (89·2–97·7; R-Biopharm) and 88·9% (82·1–93·4; Healgen). False-positive results did not appear to be associated with any specific respiratory pathogen. INTERPRETATION: The sensitivity range of most AgPOCTs overlaps with SARS-CoV-2 viral loads typically observed in the first week of symptoms, which marks the infectious period in most patients. The AgPOCTs with limit of detections that approximate virus concentrations at which patients are infectious might enable shortcuts in decision making in various areas of health care and public health. FUNDING: EU's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme, German Ministry of Research, German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy, German Ministry of Health, and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8026170 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80261702021-04-08 Comparison of seven commercial SARS-CoV-2 rapid point-of-care antigen tests: a single-centre laboratory evaluation study Corman, Victor M Haage, Verena Claudia Bleicker, Tobias Schmidt, Marie Luisa Mühlemann, Barbara Zuchowski, Marta Jo, Wendy K Tscheak, Patricia Möncke-Buchner, Elisabeth Müller, Marcel A Krumbholz, Andi Drexler, Jan Felix Drosten, Christian Lancet Microbe Articles BACKGROUND: Antigen point-of-care tests (AgPOCTs) can accelerate SARS-CoV-2 testing. As some AgPOCTs have become available, interest is growing in their utility and performance. Here we aimed to compare the analytical sensitivity and specificity of seven commercially available AgPOCT devices. METHODS: In a single-centre, laboratory evaluation study, we compared AgPOCT products from seven suppliers: the Abbott Panbio COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test, the RapiGEN BIOCREDIT COVID-19 Ag, the Healgen Coronavirus Ag Rapid Test Cassette (Swab), the Coris BioConcept COVID-19 Ag Respi-Strip, the R-Biopharm RIDA QUICK SARS-CoV-2 Antigen, the nal von minden NADAL COVID-19 Ag Test, and the Roche-SD Biosensor SARS-CoV Rapid Antigen Test. Tests were evaluated on recombinant SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein, cultured endemic and emerging coronaviruses, stored respiratory samples with known SARS-CoV-2 viral loads, stored samples from patients with respiratory pathogens other than SARS-CoV-2, and self-sampled swabs from healthy volunteers. We estimated analytical sensitivity in terms of approximate viral concentrations (quantified by real-time RT-PCR) that yielded positive AgPOCT results, and specificity in terms of propensity to generate false-positive results. FINDINGS: In 138 clinical samples with quantified SARS-CoV-2 viral load, the 95% limit of detection (concentration at which 95% of test results were positive) in six of seven AgPOCT products ranged between 2·07 × 10(6) and 2·86 × 10(7) copies per swab, with an outlier (RapiGEN) at 1·57 × 10(10) copies per swab. The assays showed no cross-reactivity towards cell culture or tissue culture supernatants containing any of the four endemic human coronaviruses (HCoV‑229E, HCoV‑NL63, HCoV‑OC43, or HCoV‑HKU1) or MERS-CoV, with the exception of the Healgen assay in one repeat test on HCoV-HKU1 supernatant. SARS-CoV was cross-detected by all assays. Cumulative specificities among stored clinical samples with non-SARS-CoV-2 infections (n=100) and self-samples from healthy volunteers (n=35; cumulative sample n=135) ranged between 98·5% (95% CI 94·2–99·7) and 100·0% (97·2–100·0) in five products, with two outliers at 94·8% (89·2–97·7; R-Biopharm) and 88·9% (82·1–93·4; Healgen). False-positive results did not appear to be associated with any specific respiratory pathogen. INTERPRETATION: The sensitivity range of most AgPOCTs overlaps with SARS-CoV-2 viral loads typically observed in the first week of symptoms, which marks the infectious period in most patients. The AgPOCTs with limit of detections that approximate virus concentrations at which patients are infectious might enable shortcuts in decision making in various areas of health care and public health. FUNDING: EU's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme, German Ministry of Research, German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy, German Ministry of Health, and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Elsevier Ltd 2021-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8026170/ /pubmed/33846704 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00056-2 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Articles Corman, Victor M Haage, Verena Claudia Bleicker, Tobias Schmidt, Marie Luisa Mühlemann, Barbara Zuchowski, Marta Jo, Wendy K Tscheak, Patricia Möncke-Buchner, Elisabeth Müller, Marcel A Krumbholz, Andi Drexler, Jan Felix Drosten, Christian Comparison of seven commercial SARS-CoV-2 rapid point-of-care antigen tests: a single-centre laboratory evaluation study |
title | Comparison of seven commercial SARS-CoV-2 rapid point-of-care antigen tests: a single-centre laboratory evaluation study |
title_full | Comparison of seven commercial SARS-CoV-2 rapid point-of-care antigen tests: a single-centre laboratory evaluation study |
title_fullStr | Comparison of seven commercial SARS-CoV-2 rapid point-of-care antigen tests: a single-centre laboratory evaluation study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of seven commercial SARS-CoV-2 rapid point-of-care antigen tests: a single-centre laboratory evaluation study |
title_short | Comparison of seven commercial SARS-CoV-2 rapid point-of-care antigen tests: a single-centre laboratory evaluation study |
title_sort | comparison of seven commercial sars-cov-2 rapid point-of-care antigen tests: a single-centre laboratory evaluation study |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8026170/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33846704 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00056-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cormanvictorm comparisonofsevencommercialsarscov2rapidpointofcareantigentestsasinglecentrelaboratoryevaluationstudy AT haageverenaclaudia comparisonofsevencommercialsarscov2rapidpointofcareantigentestsasinglecentrelaboratoryevaluationstudy AT bleickertobias comparisonofsevencommercialsarscov2rapidpointofcareantigentestsasinglecentrelaboratoryevaluationstudy AT schmidtmarieluisa comparisonofsevencommercialsarscov2rapidpointofcareantigentestsasinglecentrelaboratoryevaluationstudy AT muhlemannbarbara comparisonofsevencommercialsarscov2rapidpointofcareantigentestsasinglecentrelaboratoryevaluationstudy AT zuchowskimarta comparisonofsevencommercialsarscov2rapidpointofcareantigentestsasinglecentrelaboratoryevaluationstudy AT jowendyk comparisonofsevencommercialsarscov2rapidpointofcareantigentestsasinglecentrelaboratoryevaluationstudy AT tscheakpatricia comparisonofsevencommercialsarscov2rapidpointofcareantigentestsasinglecentrelaboratoryevaluationstudy AT monckebuchnerelisabeth comparisonofsevencommercialsarscov2rapidpointofcareantigentestsasinglecentrelaboratoryevaluationstudy AT mullermarcela comparisonofsevencommercialsarscov2rapidpointofcareantigentestsasinglecentrelaboratoryevaluationstudy AT krumbholzandi comparisonofsevencommercialsarscov2rapidpointofcareantigentestsasinglecentrelaboratoryevaluationstudy AT drexlerjanfelix comparisonofsevencommercialsarscov2rapidpointofcareantigentestsasinglecentrelaboratoryevaluationstudy AT drostenchristian comparisonofsevencommercialsarscov2rapidpointofcareantigentestsasinglecentrelaboratoryevaluationstudy |