Cargando…

Comparison of seven commercial SARS-CoV-2 rapid point-of-care antigen tests: a single-centre laboratory evaluation study

BACKGROUND: Antigen point-of-care tests (AgPOCTs) can accelerate SARS-CoV-2 testing. As some AgPOCTs have become available, interest is growing in their utility and performance. Here we aimed to compare the analytical sensitivity and specificity of seven commercially available AgPOCT devices. METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Corman, Victor M, Haage, Verena Claudia, Bleicker, Tobias, Schmidt, Marie Luisa, Mühlemann, Barbara, Zuchowski, Marta, Jo, Wendy K, Tscheak, Patricia, Möncke-Buchner, Elisabeth, Müller, Marcel A, Krumbholz, Andi, Drexler, Jan Felix, Drosten, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Ltd 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8026170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33846704
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00056-2
_version_ 1783675624151318528
author Corman, Victor M
Haage, Verena Claudia
Bleicker, Tobias
Schmidt, Marie Luisa
Mühlemann, Barbara
Zuchowski, Marta
Jo, Wendy K
Tscheak, Patricia
Möncke-Buchner, Elisabeth
Müller, Marcel A
Krumbholz, Andi
Drexler, Jan Felix
Drosten, Christian
author_facet Corman, Victor M
Haage, Verena Claudia
Bleicker, Tobias
Schmidt, Marie Luisa
Mühlemann, Barbara
Zuchowski, Marta
Jo, Wendy K
Tscheak, Patricia
Möncke-Buchner, Elisabeth
Müller, Marcel A
Krumbholz, Andi
Drexler, Jan Felix
Drosten, Christian
author_sort Corman, Victor M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Antigen point-of-care tests (AgPOCTs) can accelerate SARS-CoV-2 testing. As some AgPOCTs have become available, interest is growing in their utility and performance. Here we aimed to compare the analytical sensitivity and specificity of seven commercially available AgPOCT devices. METHODS: In a single-centre, laboratory evaluation study, we compared AgPOCT products from seven suppliers: the Abbott Panbio COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test, the RapiGEN BIOCREDIT COVID-19 Ag, the Healgen Coronavirus Ag Rapid Test Cassette (Swab), the Coris BioConcept COVID-19 Ag Respi-Strip, the R-Biopharm RIDA QUICK SARS-CoV-2 Antigen, the nal von minden NADAL COVID-19 Ag Test, and the Roche-SD Biosensor SARS-CoV Rapid Antigen Test. Tests were evaluated on recombinant SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein, cultured endemic and emerging coronaviruses, stored respiratory samples with known SARS-CoV-2 viral loads, stored samples from patients with respiratory pathogens other than SARS-CoV-2, and self-sampled swabs from healthy volunteers. We estimated analytical sensitivity in terms of approximate viral concentrations (quantified by real-time RT-PCR) that yielded positive AgPOCT results, and specificity in terms of propensity to generate false-positive results. FINDINGS: In 138 clinical samples with quantified SARS-CoV-2 viral load, the 95% limit of detection (concentration at which 95% of test results were positive) in six of seven AgPOCT products ranged between 2·07 × 10(6) and 2·86 × 10(7) copies per swab, with an outlier (RapiGEN) at 1·57 × 10(10) copies per swab. The assays showed no cross-reactivity towards cell culture or tissue culture supernatants containing any of the four endemic human coronaviruses (HCoV‑229E, HCoV‑NL63, HCoV‑OC43, or HCoV‑HKU1) or MERS-CoV, with the exception of the Healgen assay in one repeat test on HCoV-HKU1 supernatant. SARS-CoV was cross-detected by all assays. Cumulative specificities among stored clinical samples with non-SARS-CoV-2 infections (n=100) and self-samples from healthy volunteers (n=35; cumulative sample n=135) ranged between 98·5% (95% CI 94·2–99·7) and 100·0% (97·2–100·0) in five products, with two outliers at 94·8% (89·2–97·7; R-Biopharm) and 88·9% (82·1–93·4; Healgen). False-positive results did not appear to be associated with any specific respiratory pathogen. INTERPRETATION: The sensitivity range of most AgPOCTs overlaps with SARS-CoV-2 viral loads typically observed in the first week of symptoms, which marks the infectious period in most patients. The AgPOCTs with limit of detections that approximate virus concentrations at which patients are infectious might enable shortcuts in decision making in various areas of health care and public health. FUNDING: EU's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme, German Ministry of Research, German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy, German Ministry of Health, and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8026170
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80261702021-04-08 Comparison of seven commercial SARS-CoV-2 rapid point-of-care antigen tests: a single-centre laboratory evaluation study Corman, Victor M Haage, Verena Claudia Bleicker, Tobias Schmidt, Marie Luisa Mühlemann, Barbara Zuchowski, Marta Jo, Wendy K Tscheak, Patricia Möncke-Buchner, Elisabeth Müller, Marcel A Krumbholz, Andi Drexler, Jan Felix Drosten, Christian Lancet Microbe Articles BACKGROUND: Antigen point-of-care tests (AgPOCTs) can accelerate SARS-CoV-2 testing. As some AgPOCTs have become available, interest is growing in their utility and performance. Here we aimed to compare the analytical sensitivity and specificity of seven commercially available AgPOCT devices. METHODS: In a single-centre, laboratory evaluation study, we compared AgPOCT products from seven suppliers: the Abbott Panbio COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test, the RapiGEN BIOCREDIT COVID-19 Ag, the Healgen Coronavirus Ag Rapid Test Cassette (Swab), the Coris BioConcept COVID-19 Ag Respi-Strip, the R-Biopharm RIDA QUICK SARS-CoV-2 Antigen, the nal von minden NADAL COVID-19 Ag Test, and the Roche-SD Biosensor SARS-CoV Rapid Antigen Test. Tests were evaluated on recombinant SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein, cultured endemic and emerging coronaviruses, stored respiratory samples with known SARS-CoV-2 viral loads, stored samples from patients with respiratory pathogens other than SARS-CoV-2, and self-sampled swabs from healthy volunteers. We estimated analytical sensitivity in terms of approximate viral concentrations (quantified by real-time RT-PCR) that yielded positive AgPOCT results, and specificity in terms of propensity to generate false-positive results. FINDINGS: In 138 clinical samples with quantified SARS-CoV-2 viral load, the 95% limit of detection (concentration at which 95% of test results were positive) in six of seven AgPOCT products ranged between 2·07 × 10(6) and 2·86 × 10(7) copies per swab, with an outlier (RapiGEN) at 1·57 × 10(10) copies per swab. The assays showed no cross-reactivity towards cell culture or tissue culture supernatants containing any of the four endemic human coronaviruses (HCoV‑229E, HCoV‑NL63, HCoV‑OC43, or HCoV‑HKU1) or MERS-CoV, with the exception of the Healgen assay in one repeat test on HCoV-HKU1 supernatant. SARS-CoV was cross-detected by all assays. Cumulative specificities among stored clinical samples with non-SARS-CoV-2 infections (n=100) and self-samples from healthy volunteers (n=35; cumulative sample n=135) ranged between 98·5% (95% CI 94·2–99·7) and 100·0% (97·2–100·0) in five products, with two outliers at 94·8% (89·2–97·7; R-Biopharm) and 88·9% (82·1–93·4; Healgen). False-positive results did not appear to be associated with any specific respiratory pathogen. INTERPRETATION: The sensitivity range of most AgPOCTs overlaps with SARS-CoV-2 viral loads typically observed in the first week of symptoms, which marks the infectious period in most patients. The AgPOCTs with limit of detections that approximate virus concentrations at which patients are infectious might enable shortcuts in decision making in various areas of health care and public health. FUNDING: EU's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme, German Ministry of Research, German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy, German Ministry of Health, and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Elsevier Ltd 2021-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8026170/ /pubmed/33846704 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00056-2 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Articles
Corman, Victor M
Haage, Verena Claudia
Bleicker, Tobias
Schmidt, Marie Luisa
Mühlemann, Barbara
Zuchowski, Marta
Jo, Wendy K
Tscheak, Patricia
Möncke-Buchner, Elisabeth
Müller, Marcel A
Krumbholz, Andi
Drexler, Jan Felix
Drosten, Christian
Comparison of seven commercial SARS-CoV-2 rapid point-of-care antigen tests: a single-centre laboratory evaluation study
title Comparison of seven commercial SARS-CoV-2 rapid point-of-care antigen tests: a single-centre laboratory evaluation study
title_full Comparison of seven commercial SARS-CoV-2 rapid point-of-care antigen tests: a single-centre laboratory evaluation study
title_fullStr Comparison of seven commercial SARS-CoV-2 rapid point-of-care antigen tests: a single-centre laboratory evaluation study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of seven commercial SARS-CoV-2 rapid point-of-care antigen tests: a single-centre laboratory evaluation study
title_short Comparison of seven commercial SARS-CoV-2 rapid point-of-care antigen tests: a single-centre laboratory evaluation study
title_sort comparison of seven commercial sars-cov-2 rapid point-of-care antigen tests: a single-centre laboratory evaluation study
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8026170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33846704
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00056-2
work_keys_str_mv AT cormanvictorm comparisonofsevencommercialsarscov2rapidpointofcareantigentestsasinglecentrelaboratoryevaluationstudy
AT haageverenaclaudia comparisonofsevencommercialsarscov2rapidpointofcareantigentestsasinglecentrelaboratoryevaluationstudy
AT bleickertobias comparisonofsevencommercialsarscov2rapidpointofcareantigentestsasinglecentrelaboratoryevaluationstudy
AT schmidtmarieluisa comparisonofsevencommercialsarscov2rapidpointofcareantigentestsasinglecentrelaboratoryevaluationstudy
AT muhlemannbarbara comparisonofsevencommercialsarscov2rapidpointofcareantigentestsasinglecentrelaboratoryevaluationstudy
AT zuchowskimarta comparisonofsevencommercialsarscov2rapidpointofcareantigentestsasinglecentrelaboratoryevaluationstudy
AT jowendyk comparisonofsevencommercialsarscov2rapidpointofcareantigentestsasinglecentrelaboratoryevaluationstudy
AT tscheakpatricia comparisonofsevencommercialsarscov2rapidpointofcareantigentestsasinglecentrelaboratoryevaluationstudy
AT monckebuchnerelisabeth comparisonofsevencommercialsarscov2rapidpointofcareantigentestsasinglecentrelaboratoryevaluationstudy
AT mullermarcela comparisonofsevencommercialsarscov2rapidpointofcareantigentestsasinglecentrelaboratoryevaluationstudy
AT krumbholzandi comparisonofsevencommercialsarscov2rapidpointofcareantigentestsasinglecentrelaboratoryevaluationstudy
AT drexlerjanfelix comparisonofsevencommercialsarscov2rapidpointofcareantigentestsasinglecentrelaboratoryevaluationstudy
AT drostenchristian comparisonofsevencommercialsarscov2rapidpointofcareantigentestsasinglecentrelaboratoryevaluationstudy