Cargando…

Staple-line reinforcement using barbed sutures in 1008 sleeve gastrectomies

PURPOSE: Among various staple-line reinforcement methods applied during sleeve gastrectomy (SG), although data on full-thickness-continuous-suturing (FTCS) is nearly nil, it has been considered as potentially harmful. The safety/efficacy profile of FTCS is assessed. METHODS: All consecutive SGs comp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Özgen, Görkem, Çalıkoğlu, İsmail, Acunaş, Bülent, Yerdel, Mehmet Ali
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8026176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33829311
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-021-02161-5
_version_ 1783675625086648320
author Özgen, Görkem
Çalıkoğlu, İsmail
Acunaş, Bülent
Yerdel, Mehmet Ali
author_facet Özgen, Görkem
Çalıkoğlu, İsmail
Acunaş, Bülent
Yerdel, Mehmet Ali
author_sort Özgen, Görkem
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Among various staple-line reinforcement methods applied during sleeve gastrectomy (SG), although data on full-thickness-continuous-suturing (FTCS) is nearly nil, it has been considered as potentially harmful. The safety/efficacy profile of FTCS is assessed. METHODS: All consecutive SGs completing 3-month follow-up were studied. Data on peri-operative parameters, complications, and follow-up were prospectively recorded. All reinforcements were completed by FTCS utilizing barbed suture. Super-super obese, secondary SGs, SGs performed in patients with prior anti-reflux surgery, and SGs performed with additional concomitant procedures were evaluated as “technically demanding” SGs. Student’s t/chi-square tests were used as appropriate. RESULTS: Between January 2012 and July 2020, 1008 SGs (941 “primary-standard,” 67 “technically demanding”) were performed without mortality/venous event. Single leak occurred in a patient with sleeve obstruction (0.1%). Thirteen bleedings, 4 requiring re-surgery (0.4%), and 17 stenoses (1.7%) were encountered. Four stenoses were treated with gastric bypass (1 emergency), 6 by dilatation(s), and one required parenteral nutrition. Six patients with stenosis chose not to have any treatment. No statistically significant difference was observed in postoperative complications between “primary-standard” and “technically demanding” SGs (p > 0.05). The median follow-up was 44 months. The excess weight loss % at 5th year was 80.1%. Suturing added 28.4 ± 6 minutes to the SG, 3 or fewer sutures were used to complete the reinforcement in > 95%. No mishap/complication occurred related to suturing. CONCLUSION: FTCS produced excellent result in terms of leakage/hemorrhage with an acceptable stenosis rate at a low cost with half-an-hour increase in the operating time. In contrast to previous allegations, no harm attributable to stitching itself occurred. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00423-021-02161-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8026176
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80261762021-04-08 Staple-line reinforcement using barbed sutures in 1008 sleeve gastrectomies Özgen, Görkem Çalıkoğlu, İsmail Acunaş, Bülent Yerdel, Mehmet Ali Langenbecks Arch Surg How-I-Do-It articles PURPOSE: Among various staple-line reinforcement methods applied during sleeve gastrectomy (SG), although data on full-thickness-continuous-suturing (FTCS) is nearly nil, it has been considered as potentially harmful. The safety/efficacy profile of FTCS is assessed. METHODS: All consecutive SGs completing 3-month follow-up were studied. Data on peri-operative parameters, complications, and follow-up were prospectively recorded. All reinforcements were completed by FTCS utilizing barbed suture. Super-super obese, secondary SGs, SGs performed in patients with prior anti-reflux surgery, and SGs performed with additional concomitant procedures were evaluated as “technically demanding” SGs. Student’s t/chi-square tests were used as appropriate. RESULTS: Between January 2012 and July 2020, 1008 SGs (941 “primary-standard,” 67 “technically demanding”) were performed without mortality/venous event. Single leak occurred in a patient with sleeve obstruction (0.1%). Thirteen bleedings, 4 requiring re-surgery (0.4%), and 17 stenoses (1.7%) were encountered. Four stenoses were treated with gastric bypass (1 emergency), 6 by dilatation(s), and one required parenteral nutrition. Six patients with stenosis chose not to have any treatment. No statistically significant difference was observed in postoperative complications between “primary-standard” and “technically demanding” SGs (p > 0.05). The median follow-up was 44 months. The excess weight loss % at 5th year was 80.1%. Suturing added 28.4 ± 6 minutes to the SG, 3 or fewer sutures were used to complete the reinforcement in > 95%. No mishap/complication occurred related to suturing. CONCLUSION: FTCS produced excellent result in terms of leakage/hemorrhage with an acceptable stenosis rate at a low cost with half-an-hour increase in the operating time. In contrast to previous allegations, no harm attributable to stitching itself occurred. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00423-021-02161-5. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-04-07 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8026176/ /pubmed/33829311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-021-02161-5 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle How-I-Do-It articles
Özgen, Görkem
Çalıkoğlu, İsmail
Acunaş, Bülent
Yerdel, Mehmet Ali
Staple-line reinforcement using barbed sutures in 1008 sleeve gastrectomies
title Staple-line reinforcement using barbed sutures in 1008 sleeve gastrectomies
title_full Staple-line reinforcement using barbed sutures in 1008 sleeve gastrectomies
title_fullStr Staple-line reinforcement using barbed sutures in 1008 sleeve gastrectomies
title_full_unstemmed Staple-line reinforcement using barbed sutures in 1008 sleeve gastrectomies
title_short Staple-line reinforcement using barbed sutures in 1008 sleeve gastrectomies
title_sort staple-line reinforcement using barbed sutures in 1008 sleeve gastrectomies
topic How-I-Do-It articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8026176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33829311
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-021-02161-5
work_keys_str_mv AT ozgengorkem staplelinereinforcementusingbarbedsuturesin1008sleevegastrectomies
AT calıkogluismail staplelinereinforcementusingbarbedsuturesin1008sleevegastrectomies
AT acunasbulent staplelinereinforcementusingbarbedsuturesin1008sleevegastrectomies
AT yerdelmehmetali staplelinereinforcementusingbarbedsuturesin1008sleevegastrectomies