Cargando…

Response to comments to “Open versus percutaneous tracheostomy in COVID-19: a multicentre comparison and recommendationfor future resource utilisation”

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rovira, Aleix, Tricklebank, Stephen, Surda, Pavol, Whebell, Stephen, Zhang, Joe, Takhar, Arun, Yeung, Elizabeth, Fan, Kathleen, Ahmed, Imran, Hopkins, Phillip, Dawson, Deborah, Ball, Jonathan, Kumar, Ram, Khaliq, Waqas, Simo, Ricard, Arora, Asit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8026387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33830366
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-06775-9
_version_ 1783675663297806336
author Rovira, Aleix
Tricklebank, Stephen
Surda, Pavol
Whebell, Stephen
Zhang, Joe
Takhar, Arun
Yeung, Elizabeth
Fan, Kathleen
Ahmed, Imran
Hopkins, Phillip
Dawson, Deborah
Ball, Jonathan
Kumar, Ram
Khaliq, Waqas
Simo, Ricard
Arora, Asit
author_facet Rovira, Aleix
Tricklebank, Stephen
Surda, Pavol
Whebell, Stephen
Zhang, Joe
Takhar, Arun
Yeung, Elizabeth
Fan, Kathleen
Ahmed, Imran
Hopkins, Phillip
Dawson, Deborah
Ball, Jonathan
Kumar, Ram
Khaliq, Waqas
Simo, Ricard
Arora, Asit
author_sort Rovira, Aleix
collection PubMed
description
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8026387
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80263872021-04-08 Response to comments to “Open versus percutaneous tracheostomy in COVID-19: a multicentre comparison and recommendationfor future resource utilisation” Rovira, Aleix Tricklebank, Stephen Surda, Pavol Whebell, Stephen Zhang, Joe Takhar, Arun Yeung, Elizabeth Fan, Kathleen Ahmed, Imran Hopkins, Phillip Dawson, Deborah Ball, Jonathan Kumar, Ram Khaliq, Waqas Simo, Ricard Arora, Asit Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Letter to the Editor Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-04-08 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8026387/ /pubmed/33830366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-06775-9 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Letter to the Editor
Rovira, Aleix
Tricklebank, Stephen
Surda, Pavol
Whebell, Stephen
Zhang, Joe
Takhar, Arun
Yeung, Elizabeth
Fan, Kathleen
Ahmed, Imran
Hopkins, Phillip
Dawson, Deborah
Ball, Jonathan
Kumar, Ram
Khaliq, Waqas
Simo, Ricard
Arora, Asit
Response to comments to “Open versus percutaneous tracheostomy in COVID-19: a multicentre comparison and recommendationfor future resource utilisation”
title Response to comments to “Open versus percutaneous tracheostomy in COVID-19: a multicentre comparison and recommendationfor future resource utilisation”
title_full Response to comments to “Open versus percutaneous tracheostomy in COVID-19: a multicentre comparison and recommendationfor future resource utilisation”
title_fullStr Response to comments to “Open versus percutaneous tracheostomy in COVID-19: a multicentre comparison and recommendationfor future resource utilisation”
title_full_unstemmed Response to comments to “Open versus percutaneous tracheostomy in COVID-19: a multicentre comparison and recommendationfor future resource utilisation”
title_short Response to comments to “Open versus percutaneous tracheostomy in COVID-19: a multicentre comparison and recommendationfor future resource utilisation”
title_sort response to comments to “open versus percutaneous tracheostomy in covid-19: a multicentre comparison and recommendationfor future resource utilisation”
topic Letter to the Editor
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8026387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33830366
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-06775-9
work_keys_str_mv AT roviraaleix responsetocommentstoopenversuspercutaneoustracheostomyincovid19amulticentrecomparisonandrecommendationforfutureresourceutilisation
AT tricklebankstephen responsetocommentstoopenversuspercutaneoustracheostomyincovid19amulticentrecomparisonandrecommendationforfutureresourceutilisation
AT surdapavol responsetocommentstoopenversuspercutaneoustracheostomyincovid19amulticentrecomparisonandrecommendationforfutureresourceutilisation
AT whebellstephen responsetocommentstoopenversuspercutaneoustracheostomyincovid19amulticentrecomparisonandrecommendationforfutureresourceutilisation
AT zhangjoe responsetocommentstoopenversuspercutaneoustracheostomyincovid19amulticentrecomparisonandrecommendationforfutureresourceutilisation
AT takhararun responsetocommentstoopenversuspercutaneoustracheostomyincovid19amulticentrecomparisonandrecommendationforfutureresourceutilisation
AT yeungelizabeth responsetocommentstoopenversuspercutaneoustracheostomyincovid19amulticentrecomparisonandrecommendationforfutureresourceutilisation
AT fankathleen responsetocommentstoopenversuspercutaneoustracheostomyincovid19amulticentrecomparisonandrecommendationforfutureresourceutilisation
AT ahmedimran responsetocommentstoopenversuspercutaneoustracheostomyincovid19amulticentrecomparisonandrecommendationforfutureresourceutilisation
AT hopkinsphillip responsetocommentstoopenversuspercutaneoustracheostomyincovid19amulticentrecomparisonandrecommendationforfutureresourceutilisation
AT dawsondeborah responsetocommentstoopenversuspercutaneoustracheostomyincovid19amulticentrecomparisonandrecommendationforfutureresourceutilisation
AT balljonathan responsetocommentstoopenversuspercutaneoustracheostomyincovid19amulticentrecomparisonandrecommendationforfutureresourceutilisation
AT kumarram responsetocommentstoopenversuspercutaneoustracheostomyincovid19amulticentrecomparisonandrecommendationforfutureresourceutilisation
AT khaliqwaqas responsetocommentstoopenversuspercutaneoustracheostomyincovid19amulticentrecomparisonandrecommendationforfutureresourceutilisation
AT simoricard responsetocommentstoopenversuspercutaneoustracheostomyincovid19amulticentrecomparisonandrecommendationforfutureresourceutilisation
AT aroraasit responsetocommentstoopenversuspercutaneoustracheostomyincovid19amulticentrecomparisonandrecommendationforfutureresourceutilisation