Cargando…

Textbook process as a composite quality indicator for in-hospital hip fracture care

SUMMARY: Individual process indicators often do not enable the benchmarking of hospitals and often lack an association with outcomes of care. The composite hip fracture process indicator, textbook process, might be a tool to detect hospital variation and is associated with better outcomes during hos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Voeten, Stijn C., Wouters, Michel W. J. M., Würdemann, Franka S., Krijnen, Pieta, Schipper, Inger B., Hegeman, J. H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer London 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8026419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33829364
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11657-021-00909-6
_version_ 1783675671355064320
author Voeten, Stijn C.
Wouters, Michel W. J. M.
Würdemann, Franka S.
Krijnen, Pieta
Schipper, Inger B.
Hegeman, J. H.
author_facet Voeten, Stijn C.
Wouters, Michel W. J. M.
Würdemann, Franka S.
Krijnen, Pieta
Schipper, Inger B.
Hegeman, J. H.
author_sort Voeten, Stijn C.
collection PubMed
description SUMMARY: Individual process indicators often do not enable the benchmarking of hospitals and often lack an association with outcomes of care. The composite hip fracture process indicator, textbook process, might be a tool to detect hospital variation and is associated with better outcomes during hospital stay. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine hospital variation in quality of hip fracture care using a composite process indicator (textbook process) and to evaluate at patient level whether fulfilment of the textbook process indicator was associated with better outcomes during hospital stay. METHODS: Hip fracture patients aged 70 and older operated in five hospitals between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2018 were included. Textbook process for hip fracture care was defined as follows: (1) assessment of malnutrition (2) surgery within 24 h, (3) orthogeriatric management during admission and (4) operation by an orthopaedic trauma certified surgeon. Hospital variation analysis was done by computing an observed/expected ratio (O/E ratio) for textbook process at hospital level. The expected ratios were derived from a multivariable logistic regression analysis including all relevant case-mix variables. The association between textbook process compliance and in-hospital complications and prolonged hospital stay was determined at patient level in a multivariable logistic regression model, with correction for patient, treatment and hospital characteristics. In-hospital complications were anaemia, delirium, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, in-hospital fall, heart failure, renal insufficiency, pulmonary embolism, wound infection and pressure ulcer. RESULTS: Of the 1371 included patients, 753 (55%) received care according to textbook process. At hospital level, the textbook compliance rates ranged from 38 to 76%. At patient level, textbook process compliance was significantly associated with fewer complications (38% versus 46%) (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.52–0.84), but not with hospital stay (median length of hospital stay was 5 days in both groups) (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.78–1.30). CONCLUSION: The textbook process indicator for hip fracture care might be a tool to detect hospital variation. At patient level, this quality indicator is associated with fewer complications during hospital stay.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8026419
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer London
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80264192021-04-26 Textbook process as a composite quality indicator for in-hospital hip fracture care Voeten, Stijn C. Wouters, Michel W. J. M. Würdemann, Franka S. Krijnen, Pieta Schipper, Inger B. Hegeman, J. H. Arch Osteoporos Original Article SUMMARY: Individual process indicators often do not enable the benchmarking of hospitals and often lack an association with outcomes of care. The composite hip fracture process indicator, textbook process, might be a tool to detect hospital variation and is associated with better outcomes during hospital stay. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine hospital variation in quality of hip fracture care using a composite process indicator (textbook process) and to evaluate at patient level whether fulfilment of the textbook process indicator was associated with better outcomes during hospital stay. METHODS: Hip fracture patients aged 70 and older operated in five hospitals between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2018 were included. Textbook process for hip fracture care was defined as follows: (1) assessment of malnutrition (2) surgery within 24 h, (3) orthogeriatric management during admission and (4) operation by an orthopaedic trauma certified surgeon. Hospital variation analysis was done by computing an observed/expected ratio (O/E ratio) for textbook process at hospital level. The expected ratios were derived from a multivariable logistic regression analysis including all relevant case-mix variables. The association between textbook process compliance and in-hospital complications and prolonged hospital stay was determined at patient level in a multivariable logistic regression model, with correction for patient, treatment and hospital characteristics. In-hospital complications were anaemia, delirium, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, in-hospital fall, heart failure, renal insufficiency, pulmonary embolism, wound infection and pressure ulcer. RESULTS: Of the 1371 included patients, 753 (55%) received care according to textbook process. At hospital level, the textbook compliance rates ranged from 38 to 76%. At patient level, textbook process compliance was significantly associated with fewer complications (38% versus 46%) (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.52–0.84), but not with hospital stay (median length of hospital stay was 5 days in both groups) (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.78–1.30). CONCLUSION: The textbook process indicator for hip fracture care might be a tool to detect hospital variation. At patient level, this quality indicator is associated with fewer complications during hospital stay. Springer London 2021-04-08 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8026419/ /pubmed/33829364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11657-021-00909-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Voeten, Stijn C.
Wouters, Michel W. J. M.
Würdemann, Franka S.
Krijnen, Pieta
Schipper, Inger B.
Hegeman, J. H.
Textbook process as a composite quality indicator for in-hospital hip fracture care
title Textbook process as a composite quality indicator for in-hospital hip fracture care
title_full Textbook process as a composite quality indicator for in-hospital hip fracture care
title_fullStr Textbook process as a composite quality indicator for in-hospital hip fracture care
title_full_unstemmed Textbook process as a composite quality indicator for in-hospital hip fracture care
title_short Textbook process as a composite quality indicator for in-hospital hip fracture care
title_sort textbook process as a composite quality indicator for in-hospital hip fracture care
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8026419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33829364
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11657-021-00909-6
work_keys_str_mv AT voetenstijnc textbookprocessasacompositequalityindicatorforinhospitalhipfracturecare
AT woutersmichelwjm textbookprocessasacompositequalityindicatorforinhospitalhipfracturecare
AT wurdemannfrankas textbookprocessasacompositequalityindicatorforinhospitalhipfracturecare
AT krijnenpieta textbookprocessasacompositequalityindicatorforinhospitalhipfracturecare
AT schipperingerb textbookprocessasacompositequalityindicatorforinhospitalhipfracturecare
AT hegemanjh textbookprocessasacompositequalityindicatorforinhospitalhipfracturecare
AT textbookprocessasacompositequalityindicatorforinhospitalhipfracturecare